-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, my feelings on Samba in the kernel are the following.
1). We need to be able to de-multiplex incoming SMB's at the kernel
level to get over the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:41:35AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to start a discussion on the following:
Implementing some SMB functions in the Kernel, within a Samba base,
or,
Bending and twisting Samba out of shape.
There are a number of reasons for wanting to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:41:35AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
The return from the syscall would be a complete SMB, possibly with the
NetBIOS header in a separate buffer, and maybe more.
The entire NBT layer could be placed into the kernel. I would see,
perhaps, LMB, DMB, and NBNS
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, my feelings on Samba in the kernel are the following.
1). We need to be able to de-multiplex incoming SMB's at the kernel
level to get over the W2K Terminal Server problem.
OK, I am not familiar with this problem. Can you say more please.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Steven French wrote:
jra wrote
Ok, my feelings on Samba in the kernel are the following.
1). We need to be able to de-multiplex incoming SMB's at the kernel
level to get over the W2K Terminal Server problem.
2). A utf8 case-insensitive filesystem (massive performance
