Brian M Hoy wrote:
Summary
The second point happens, because the PC will _occasionally_ use a
different DC to authenticate against (it's secure channel partner in MS
parlance). If it just so happens to change its machine account password
with this SCP, then the machine's domain membership is
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:56:19AM +0800, David wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your kindly reply.
So, you mean I should add a guest account
to my unix system? Such as: pcguest?
You probably already have one. It is called 'guest'
or 'nobody' in Linux distributions.
Commonly, leaving 'guest account'
Help, please
I have a several WinXP (w/o any SP, Russian) in Samba domain. Trouble: WinXP cann't
load roaming profile.
Workaround: add current user to local group Administrators.
Working fine.
Yesterday several WinXP SP1 Eng was installed.
Trouble: WinXP cann't load roaming profile.
Check the sPNMappings attribute: looks like the Windows 2000 KDC maps a
number of things to HOST:
dn: cn=Directory Service,cn=Windows NT,cn=Services,cn=Configuration,dc=xad-0,d
c=padl,dc=com
sPNMappings: host=alerter,appmgmt,cisvc,clipsrv,browser,dhcp,dnscache,replicat
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote:
Check the sPNMappings attribute: looks like the Windows 2000 KDC maps a
number of things to HOST:
dn: cn=Directory Service,cn=Windows NT,cn=Services,cn=Configuration,dc=xad-0,d
c=padl,dc=com
sPNMappings:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 01:24, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
witch samba version are you using?
2.2.7a
BTW: there are no files attached to your mail...
They were attached, I will attach them again
metze
-
Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 01:24, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
BTW: there are no files attached to your mail...
They were attached, I will attach them again
Nope. None again. But looking in the headers:
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
The mailing list
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 10:37, Illtud Daniel wrote:
Nope. None again. But looking in the headers:
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1
The mailing list stripped the attachments (as it should, IMHO!).
Can't you send diff patches for the changes you made?
The diff for pdb_ldap.c is:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13 Feb 2003, Daniel T. Gynn wrote:
Hi all. I have been implementing a Windows Domain using Samba and LDAP
and noticed that when validating a workstation, Samba would only check
the /etc/passwd file and not LDAP. I changed the pdb_ldap.c and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Feb 2003, Brian M Hoy wrote:
If you believe the MS document, then the Samba BDC should pass the
machine account password change request to the PDC. That would be nice!
If you are using read-only replicas for Samba BDCs then the password
what do the following values in local.h do with respect to a single smbd
or are they absolute limits? please explain...
#define MAX_DIRECTORY_HANDLES 2048
#define MAX_OPEN_DIRECTORIES 256
#define MAX_OPEN_PIPES 2048
Thank you!
Bill
Hello Hal,
thanks for coding this patch, unfortunately it doesn't work for me.
Checking the generated network packets with ethereal shows that the
NT_NOTIFY packet I receive on the Windwows side
is invalid. The packet (frame size as shown in ethereal) is much too
short, it's size is 93 bytes,
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:30, Nik Conwell wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 23:32, Nik Conwell wrote:
Anybody seeing a scenario like this?
net ads join adds our machine entry to AD just fine.
The machine entry object in the AD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, my feelings on Samba in the kernel are the following.
1). We need to be able to de-multiplex incoming SMB's at the kernel
level to get over the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Shirish Kalele wrote:
In init_unistr2, the string length for the UNISTR2 structure seems to
be set equal to the number of bytes occupied by the string when
encoded in the Unix charset (i.e. the value returned by strlen()).
Thanks for clearing that up.
I took a look at the log for the file and saw that tridge expected the
'len' argument to init_unistr2() to be the character length, not the byte
length of the string. So it appears the callers will have to be fixed, not
the function as I thought.
Would be good to
Hi Tim,
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2003 21:52 schrieb Tim Potter:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 08:28:55PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hello Hal,
thanks for coding this patch, unfortunately it doesn't work for me.
Checking the generated network packets with ethereal shows that the
NT_NOTIFY
When I run OPLOCK2 smbtorture test against a CIFS server, I don't see smbtorture
responding
to oplock break request from CIFS server, any idea about this problem?
Sri
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
When I run OPLOCK2 smbtorture test against a CIFS server, I don't see smbtorture
responding
to oplock break request from CIFS server, any idea about this problem?
So, are you observing this on the wire?
Which version of smbtorture are you using?
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 02:22, Vincent Sanders wrote:
Hi I have recently had cause to cross compile samba 2.2.7a from x86 to
arm uclibc linux. During the make i have come across a problem with
the int32 macro definition in /include/includes.h (line 459) the check
works out everything to do with
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
actually it looks quite good :-)
That's good to hear!
Attached is a capture from two W2K machines talking to each other.
Packet No. 19 shows the NT NOTIFY response packet.
This capture was made using the Windows version of
Hi,
In libsmb/clispnego.c, in spnego_gen_krb5_wrap, there is the following
piece of code:
asn1_push_tag(data, ASN1_APPLICATION(0));
asn1_write_OID(data, OID_KERBEROS5);
asn1_write_BOOLEAN(data, 0);
asn1_write(data, ticket.data, ticket.length);
22 matches
Mail list logo
