Errand of mercy :-).
Jeremy.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:10:39PM +0100, Franta Hanzlik wrote:
Help !
Norton Commander and Volkov Commander badly shows directory content on
network
drives - in adition to really existing files in directory displays also
items
from parent directory. When I use refresh command, number of
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 09:36:36AM -0700, Samuel C Martinez wrote:
Samba Team,
We are trying to determine if the Samba version 2.2.8 will allow for NTLM
V2 authentication. Could you please update me on what version of Samba
allow for NTLM V2. Thank you in advance.
You really need Samba
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:18:26PM -0500, Paul E Exter wrote:
It seems to be working with 2.something?
Paul E. Exter
IT Specialist
Office of the Chief Technology Officer
U.S. Geological Survey
(410) 238 - 4234 Work
(410) 375 - 0120 Cell
I doubt you have it turned on on the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:53:44PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
Hi,
Ok. I am hooting my own trumpet it seems, but why not - just once!
http://www.open-mag.com/9085339824.shtml
Ok John, it's after midnight at my parents house.
(they're both in bed).
Will you find *AND KILL* the person
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:30:19PM -0500, Justin Baugh wrote:
3.0.2pre1 does indeed fix the Kerberos Unknown key table type problem,
but winbind nss support under FreeBSD is broken. I filed a bug (#948)
along with a simple patch which fixes the problem. Basically:
winbind_nss_freebsd.c
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:33:59PM +, Michael Keightley wrote:
It is fixed in 3.0.2pre1. Also changing to security = domain and running
net join in 3.0.1 fixed it. I've attached the log file anyway for
security = server with 3.0.1.
Do you recommend using security = domain rather than
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:48:19PM -0500, Mitch Crane wrote:
If you are mounting a share from your XP machine then yes, it's a known
problem. Though I don't recall anyone from the samba team actually
acknowledging it, I have the problem and I have seen several other reports
of this problem.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:57:09PM -0500, James Finnall wrote:
Hello List,
Can anyone please help explain how Samba handles long
filename conversion to DOS 8.3 tilde format?
Now to my knowledge these 8.3 tilde filenames do not exist
anywhere on the server. At least I unable to locate
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:29:01AM -0500, James Finnall wrote:
Thank you for your response and confirmation of the method used
to create the 8.3 names. But I am not sure what I can add to the
my original post regarding the application. The Windows app
requests an old style 8.3 filename and
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:55:15AM -0500, Mitch Crane wrote:
That's why I added that no one from the samba team had acknowledged it--I
wasn't sure you guys were aware of it, just that some people were. I only
joined the samba list about 2 weeks ago (mainly in search of a solution for
this
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:08:52AM -0500, Mitch Crane wrote:
I see. I can also reproduce the symptoms, btw, with:
smbclient //some-server/some-share -U user%pass -c 'dir foo/*' | wc -l
Though I see the missing entries less frequently (which is why I originally
thought smbclient was ok).
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:57:04PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 19:57, Marcin Snakowski wrote:
Hi
On my Samba 3.0.1 w/ldapsam if clients (W9x) attempts to change
their passwords, and it fails (because of too short password, for example)
they receive message about
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:55:27PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:40:00PM -0800, Eric Roseme wrote:
Attached is a 500KB read-only .doc file with a Samba and Terminal Server
whitepaper. I have tried to hit every known issue and all available
workarounds. If anyone
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:51:26PM -0600, Eric Brueggmann wrote:
[2004/01/26 16:30:48, 0] lib/util.c:smb_xmalloc(2055)
smb_xmalloc() failed to allocate 3221213488 bytes
[2004/01/26 16:30:48, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1400)
PANIC: smb_xmalloc: malloc fail.
[2004/01/26 16:30:48, 0]
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:25:39AM +0100, Per Kjetil Grotnes wrote:
Ok, I have had a preview of the document. The Terminal Server issues
are as far as I can see all covered except one. This issue is related
to a Solaris 32 bit application limitation. I do not know if HP-UX got
this
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:15:26PM -0500, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
They are saying there is a cleartext step in pam_winbind that does not
exist when using local passwords. They are also saying that windows
servers are secure when autthenticaing against the PDC, but linux
servers are not.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:50:01PM -0500, Chris Kordish wrote:
Hi There,
Do any of the latest versions of Samba
interoperate with WinFS found in Microsoft future OS
called Longhorn ?
Thanks
Chris Kordish
Staff Engineer - Sun Microsystems
Competitive Strategy Group - CTO Office
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:34:17AM +0100, Jerome Borsboom wrote:
We are running samba-3.0.2rc1 under linux-2.4.24 with nss-ldap-
215. Sometimes the smbd children spawned by the main smbd
process are killed by a SIGPIPE. A quick look in the samba
source shows that SIGPIPE should be blocked
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
Hi all,
We are considering moving our VSS database from a Win2K server to a samba server.
All clients are Win2K clients.
I used the VSS tool testlock.exe to make sure the native lock mode can be used.
The test was successful, and
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:13:55PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
Well, actually all oplocks where turned off in my smb.conf.
I tried to checkin and checkout some files with few users, but no SMBlocks.
Using samba-2.2.8a (I forgot to mention)
No lockingX calls ? There are several possible locking
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:24:08PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:23, Kevin Morland wrote:
Hello,
I am having a little problem, with Samba 2.2.5. I have a few users
that have Japanese file formats. Once they copy them over to the samba
server, they lose
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Dexter Filmore wrote:
Samba will not modify the contents of the file, however Samba 2.2 has
very poor support for anything other than ASCII in filenames. Samba 3.0
introduced real support for unicode filenames.
Been there, doesn't work. Put
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:02:30AM -0800, Kevin Morland wrote:
How would you set the code page correctly, to do both languages?
In Samba 2.2 set :
client code page = 932
(for Japanese SJIS) and then set character set to the encoding
used on the Japanese UNIX system and also look at the coding
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:26:01PM -0600, Thomas Hannan wrote:
Hello,
I have a question to tack on to this one --
How would I go about compiling Samba such that it either didn't pass
locking requests (for file shares, not TDB's) to fcntl() and just
handled these locks internally for the
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:22:31PM +0100, Collen wrote:
Well got a problem i gues...
i got even more error's in my log files..
some about schannel processing error, or no route to host or get peer
name...
still everything looks to be working fine.. (got no complaints from
the users)
but
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:12:16PM -0600, Thomas Hannan wrote:
This is exactly the case -- I want it to NOT pass down a 64 bit lock to
fcntl but it does. I unfortunately have no alternative but to re-export
an NFS mount (v3 on linux), and have tried to make it fail the configure
test for 64
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:28:14PM +0100, Tarjei Huse wrote:
Feb 2 19:11:50 grisen smbd[26068]: [2004/02/02 19:11:50, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1408)
Feb 2 19:11:50 grisen smbd[26068]: BACKTRACE: 17 stack frames:
Feb 2 19:11:50 grisen smbd[26068]:#0
/usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x1ab)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:24:09AM +0100, Collen wrote:
Ehh, i know this might be a stupid question.. but
how do i set/do this MALLOC_CHECK_=2 thing..
(is there some howto??)
export MALLOC_CHECK_=2
if you're using bash - then run smbd.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:14:31AM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote:
Let me be more specific of what I am trying to do.
I am the engineer at Sun that wrote the cluster agent for
Samba, a standard HA agent.
This works as a dream and is deployed on several clusters
around the world.
Now, I
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:35:11PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
Our computers in our office ceased being able to print to a shared cups
printer today. Could not find the cause. Seems the smbd processes are
dying. Below is the stack trace produced by gdb bt full.
The Samba 'panic action'
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Collen wrote:
i did the export MALLOC_CHECH_=2 thing.
the i a stop and start of the init.d script of samba..
but no extra debug info in the log's or as an file..
sugestions ??
Try valgrind next - this is what I use to track down
memory problems.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:37:30PM +0100, Collen wrote:
I figured out what the problem of the panic action is.
it in the codepages..
i had a users personal directory coppied directly from a samba 2.2.x
server
and now all the file names with eg. û,î,É ect.. gave an error.
samba 3 paniced
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:29:16AM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
Nope. In fact, I do suspect bad ram. I don't know why it would be
consistant though. I would think that bad ram would effect more than
just samba's printing. And you'd think reacreating the process
(different location in memory)
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:22:24AM -0500, Luis Alberto Reyes R. wrote:
we have installed a samba server 3.02rc2 in a redhat linux 9, the first 3
days works fine, but today is not possible to initialize the nmbd command,
it says that exists the following error (all other logs are ok, the samba
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:31:22PM -0500, Jason Mader wrote:
Samba 3.0.2 and earlier on Irix 6.5 haven't been detecting libiconv,
even when using the --with-libiconv directive.
I found it best to configure libiconv as,
./configure --prefix=/opt --libdir=/opt/lib32
because /opt/lib32 is
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:25:25AM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote:
The things that tricked me was that I read the docs
for Samba 3 regarding locks.
And it says in the third paragraph in section 14.2
Samba 2.2 and above implements record locking completely independent
of the underlying
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 07:46:11AM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote:
Yes, your are wright. But Samba will not
do a byte ranged lock using fcntl() on the file
when lock range is below 2^31 as stated in the docs.
No, you've got it wrong (I *wrote* the mapping code). Samba checks
a lock request
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:39:01AM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote:
Well, you should know.
But if Samba is doing byte ranged lock using fcntl, then
I don't understand why my tests failed.
The first test I did was:
I simulated a NFS client and did byte range lock on a file,
a document in
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:11:48PM +0100, Thomas Bork wrote:
Hallo Jeremy,
You're confusing share modes with byte range locks. Read up on share
modes - smbstatus doesn't report byte range locks, only share modes.
Until you understand the difference we're not really communicating :-).
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:29:47AM +0100, Steffen Kauka wrote:
You did suggest to try Samba 3 - I did it. My test environment consists of a
PC (Pentium 4 2.4 GHz CPU and 512 MB RAM), a SUN Blade 100 (500 MHz CPU, 256
MB RAM) and between both a switched network at a speed of 100 MBit/s. The
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 02:11:07PM +0100, Patrik Gustavsson wrote:
Let me the try to communicate in a different way.
The only thing I want to know if byte range locks
or file share reservation are propagated to or from UNIX.
That is:
a) When a external program is doing a byte range
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:46:01PM -0500, Jim Davee wrote:
1. Files that end in . (a dot) are producing short-name displays on
Windows such as filen~12 instead of filename.. When we remove the dot
as the last character of the file name, the Windows display works properly
and shows the long
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:19:32PM +0100, Christopher Odenbach wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just installed and tested 3.0.2 for debian from backports.org. After some
time I got an internal error:
Can you reproduce this at will ? If so, can you try running
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:44:57PM -0800, Mani, Greg SPAWAR wrote:
We have a network of PCs running XP and servers running Win 2k and Win 2003.
User Account management is done with Active Directory (AD). We want to add some Sun
Solaris computers to this network. One of the network
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:59:55AM -0800, Thomas wrote:
(samba 3.0.2a via RPM, ADS, SuSE 9)
Every day Windbind stops responding, although the
process is active.
When this happens, getent passwd returns just local
users, and wbinfo -u returns Error looking up domain
users
If i 'reload'
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:02:04PM +0100, Simone Lazzaris wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I've got a serious problem with my samba installation (samba
3.0.2.a, compiled from sources).
The problem seems to occour when printing a file on a printer connected
~ to
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:28:27AM +0100, TeeCee wrote:
Hi!
I want to list users from smbpasswd (stored in /etc/samba). I chmoded the
file from 600 to 644, to ba able to read it with PHP. After a while somehow
it changed back to 600, so it was fully unreadable again :(
How can I set
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:10:09AM +0100, TeeCee wrote:
I may have known the security reasons, but the password is not in plain text,
The password hash is equivalent to plain text in smb.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:50:47AM +0100, Thomas Mikl wrote:
Hi!
I have the following config:
RedHat ES 3
Samba 3.0.2a with OpenLDAP 2.0.27
Everything works fine having Samba setup as a PDC. But when trying to
join a (brand new) NetApp F810 to the domain I get an error: Could not
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:40:34AM -0800, Crosland, Jerel wrote:
But is there some way to compile en_US support into Samba? In my google research it
seems that RH uses en_US.UTF-8 and the instructions were to simply remove the .UTF-8
to get it to work. I don't want to have to train my admins
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:33AM -0800, Linux Lover wrote:
I apologize up front for re-posting this, but I need
to find a solution to this problem. I have been having
hard time to believe that there isn't one person among
the SMB gurus that doesn't know how a W2K client
connects to an SMB
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:52:09PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote:
Starting three days ago I have found over 4,000 of these error messages in
my messages log.
Mar 5 15:49:48 fs3 smbd[13785]: alloc_sub_basic: NULL source string!
This should not happen
Nothing has been changed on the samba
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:33:28PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote:
Could you tell me or point me to an article that says how to implement that?
I didn't find anything on a search that specifically said how to do it.
Ah, I meant doing a source code change I can send you a brief
patch for that if
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:49:01PM -0600, Jeff Umbach wrote:
Unfortunately that is not possible on this server, it is a live server that
a restaraunt's point of sale system is running on, so I can't just go
recompiling the samba.
Is it reproducible on a non-live server we can do experiments on
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 01:21:28PM +0200, Peter Piechutzki wrote:
Hello,
thx for the quick response.
You are certainly right about the oplocks and we had both levels
turned off for testing with the same results.
After extensive testing and analyzing the sourcecode of openfile() we
are
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 06:40:14PM +0200, jo / ak wrote:
After running several days in the same configuration, my 3.0.6
nmbd crashed with the above error (see log below). Maybe there
is a connection to this message some seconds before:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:49:22PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks. When using Dreamweaver MX 2004 on a Win2k machine talking to
a Samba machine I have a strange problem.
For every key stroke or mouse event within the Dreamweaver window I see
a flurry of SMB packets
Mostly
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:33:49AM -0400, Jason McCormick wrote:
Tony Breeds wrote:
I was told to experiment with the following settings
use sendfile = no
large readwrite = no
max xmit = 16644
For me the sendfile option was the correct answer.
'use sendfile = no' appears to be the
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:55:17PM -0400, Elijah Savage wrote:
Just for others to know.
I am not sure why this has made m errors go away in my log files and
also fixed my speed issue when copying from the samba server to my
clients but it did.
I added this
server signing = auto
To
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
it's be useful fix in the upstream too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135832
I think this is already fixed in the SVN code.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 03:26:19PM -0700, ODC wrote:
I'm running Debian woody with all stable packages w/e to samba which is
from the backports collection.
Basically 3.0.5 works, 3.0.6 and 3.0.7 do not.
By not working, I mean connecting from a windows workstation results in
a login and
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:38:57PM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
Still gathering data on this one, but it's easy to reproduce the case
insensitive collision.
AIX 5.2 Samba 3.0.7.
in unix create two dirs on a user's [homes] share:
CISS-102
ciss-102
put files from windows (I used
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 03:28:57PM -0500, Brian White wrote:
I've installed Samba 3.0.7 (stock Debian package), but I'm having some
wierd problems with name mangling. The relevant lines in smb.conf are:
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
mangled names = yes
mangle
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:04:44PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
Configuration Overview:
OS: Fedora Core 2
Samba:3.0.7-2 (as distributed) configured as a PDC using ldap for
authentication info
LDAP: openldap 2.1.29
Ever since we upgraded to Samba 3 we've been
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:40:07PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
The ldap client libraries are from openldap-2.1.29.
I would use strace to find out who is resetting that signal
handler. It isn't smbd.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:30:58AM -0800, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
I am trying to build 3.0.8 Release on OS X Server 10.3.6 as the latest
version of samba installed with the 10.3.6 update (3.0.5) has broken
our backup strategy which has a Windows server backing up SAMBA/SMB
volumes ( this
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:56:41AM -0800, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Clearly SAMBA needs plenty of patches to compile on OS X , these are
noted at
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.3.6/samba-59/patches/
Perhaps these could be rolled into the SAMBA distribution at one point?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:16:28AM -0800, Michael Bartosh wrote:
That would be very nice.
Not with these patches it wouldn't :-).
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:03:21PM -0900, Christopher Swingley wrote:
Greetings!
I've got a samba server that's serving Windows and Mac clients. I want
to restrict the [homes] share such that users can *only* connect to
their own home directory, and not make read-only connections to other
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Tilo Lutz wrote:
So back to my first question:
Why doesn't kde run with a homedir mounted via cifs?
This is something we're explicitly working to support. Can you log
any bugs found with the samba.org bugzilla please. We really want
both KDE GNome
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:22:27AM -0600, Paul Gienger wrote:
Well I told myself I wasn't coming back to this (off topic) 'why NFS is
bad' discussion, but since I kindof started it...
My point was simply that you're doing a conversion back to the original
format through a potential lossy
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:15PM -0800, Tom Dickson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We had 3.0.2a which worked fine. If you tried to open a file that the
ACLs wouldn't let you, you'd get access denied. We had follow
symlinks=no in smb.conf
Now with 3.0.8, and no
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:40:19AM +0100, Tilo Lutz wrote:
Hi
We use the exact same setup as you. We found NFS too insecure for our
tastes aswell.
Here are our experiences with it:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2004-November/000477.html
( http://tinyurl.com/55ofl )
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:11:26PM +0100, Tilo Lutz wrote:
If you're pointing it at a Samba server then get a debug level 10 log
with timestamps so you can tell what is going on on the wire.
It might be easier for test purposes to set up a loopback mount onto
the same machine to
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:15PM -0800, Tom Dickson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We had 3.0.2a which worked fine. If you tried to open a file that the
ACLs wouldn't let you, you'd get access denied. We had follow
symlinks=no in smb.conf
Now with 3.0.8, and no
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:41:57PM +0100, Thomas Bork wrote:
Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version
that production Samba servers should be running for all
current bug-fixes. There have been several important issues
fixes since the
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:25:08AM -0600, Paul Espinosa wrote:
Over the last week I've upgraded one of my samba servers to FC3. I ran into
some problems joining XP machines to the domain. Tracing back the problem
I've found that FC3 has changed the behavior of the useradd/adduser script.
It
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:38:57PM +0100, evilninja wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after upgrading to samba 3.0.8 (debian/unstable, i386) i too encounter
similar problems as reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/095567.html
upon
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:26:36PM -0800, John Stile wrote:
I installed samba-3.0.9-1 on RedHat-AS3, configured it as a member
server, and joined the domain. wbinfo -u and -g work. When I brows to
the samba share from Windows XP client, I see the shares, and my home
directory is listed, but
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:56:58PM -0700, Mike Lee wrote:
Hello all,
I have a Fedora 2 server running as a file server. Security = DOMAIN and
using winbindd successfully (so I think). Also the shared partitions are
formated using XFS so acls should be good to go. However, whenever I
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 05:05:54AM -0800, John Stile wrote:
Is there an rpm available for RedHat AS?
I got it working but only after some bad practices.
My verbose notes follow:
Well done ! Thanks for posting these to the list, I'm sure
others will find them useful (and you went through a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:23:23AM -0500, William R. Knox wrote:
OK, I've now downgraded back to an older, formerly working version of
Samba (3.0.2a), and the same behavior is still happening (i.e. after
rejoining the domain, it works for 15 minutes and then stops with a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:04:06PM +0100, Bård Kalbakk wrote:
Hi
I'm having major problems setting up Samba 3.0.9 with kerberos
authentication. I have also tried with 3.0.8(from Debian SID) with same
result.
smb.conf[1] has 'security = ads' , and 'use kerberos keytab = yes'.
I have set up
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 04:31:44PM -0500, William R. Knox wrote:
One final note - though I hadn't had it before, during the course of some
testing, I put in a second domain controller that did have the 1c entries,
and that didn't help the situation, i.e. only the first wins server
parameter
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:47:08PM -, ALLEN, David wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone any ideas what is causing my smbd processes to crash? The files
being accessed via samba are on an NFS mounted directory. In the samba log
file I am getting the following errors:
[2004/12/03 16:31:33, 0]
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:29:29PM -0800, Tom Skeren wrote:
I'm about ready to smash my head through a wall...I could use a few answers.
1. When using security = ads, and completing net ads join, it was my
understanding that samba authenticated username/pword against ads, and
local posix
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:08:56PM -0600, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Apologies if this is a FAQ.
Kind of.
We are saddled with some directories full of production image files that
number in the hundreds of thousands to the millions. (Yes, I know this
is bad.) They reside on a couple of Win 2003
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:04:05PM -0800, Tom Skeren wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
It was an smb.conf issue. Authentication against ADS is now
functioning. Now it's time to wrestle with ACLs. Thanks for the help.
Thanks for the update. I'm suprised though. What was the smb.conf
problem
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:37:23PM -0600, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Obviously such a special case would make the code ugly...but I might try
patching it just for my own testing to see if it makes any difference.
Any pointers you can offer?
That's exactly the case I was intending to add :-). I'm
Luke Leighton (lkcl) has brought up his arguments about control
of Samba before. In October 2000 they resulted in the creation
of a new Samba code branch, samba-tng, which Luke and others who
agreed with his direction were free to do with as they will.
Samba-tng still exists, and we in the Samba
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:45:21AM +1100, Steve Simeonidis wrote:
Regardless of what is going on this is not right in my opinion.
So we're going to ban Luke from posting to the Samba Lists for three months
There must be another way to work things out.
Well we have tried other ways and they
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:25:28PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Does anyone have any code for inspecting Samba TDB files from Mono or
just in C#? Is the format of the TDB file documented somewhere?
Only in the source code I'm afraid. The tdb C code would convert to
Java or C# quite
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:17:29AM -0600, David Schlenk wrote:
Today's security patch doesn't work if you also want to use the
printing patch for 3.0.9 mentioned recently on this list.
Build error:
Linking bin/smbd
printing/printing.o(.text+0x2d4b): In function `print_queue_update':
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:57:54PM -0500, William Jojo wrote:
I have a fix for the sendfile.c code for HP-UX - length not properly
specified prior to call.
I've also added code to support the AIX send_file() function and
configure.in code to check for AIX specific send_file API and sets
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:09:59PM -0500, Victor Moran wrote:
Hello List,
I've searched the internet and I haven't been able to figure this out.
I hope someone here can point me in the right direction.
I have a MacOSX 10.3 machine and a WinXP machine that are being used to
produce large
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:19:38AM -0500, John Ward wrote:
Gentlemen,
I have noticed (!) an unbelievable drop in performance with
Windows xp pro sp2 systems, compared to sp1. The performance
I have noticed is 122 seconds to write 65,000 indexed records
to a dBase type file under sp2 and
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:06:47PM -0500, William Jojo wrote:
Why in smbd/reply.c does send_file_readX only use sendfile if write cache
size is 0?
Because it would be difficult to serve the read partially
out of write cache, and partially from the disk. So rather
than work out that
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:51:05AM -0500, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
My users are very very happy, and my boss is extremely pleased with the
price-point and the performance. I just wanted to let you guys hear of a
Samba success story. I will be happy to offer any advice for what I have
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:00:07PM +0100, Samba list wrote:
Hi,
I need advise by someone with knowledge about the inner workings of
MS Installer to explain the behavioural difference between using a
Samba share and a native Windows share.
I'm trying to install a (commercial) package on
1 - 100 of 7602 matches
Mail list logo
