Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:55 PM, m. allan noah wrote: > Well, I got over my fear of clicking on 'raw sewage' and looked at a Ha! That's a tribute to my BBS days, many many years ago. Dating myself here! > couple of your images. I agree that this is a bug, the swdeskew

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Matt Garman wrote: > Hi Allan, > > Thank you for taking the time to provide some feedback and look into this! > > More commentary inline below: > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:06 PM, m. allan noah wrote: >> In general,

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

Hi Allan, Thank you for taking the time to provide some feedback and look into this! More commentary inline below: On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:06 PM, m. allan noah wrote: > In general, if you are using swdeskew, it is probably better to scan > at full width, and use the

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

Matt- I wrote both the sane-fujitsu backend, and the sanei_magic library that it uses to provide the deskew/crop, etc functions. I'll try to answer your questions as best I can. BTW, sorry I did not reply sooner- I have been traveling, and wanted to write something a bit longer than I could stand

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

> is it necessary to always specify the paper size and scan area for every > single document? I'm not sure on this question, but for semi-auto cropping, you'll likely need to perform something to the similar, for which I (obviously) haven't yet mastered: # Acquire scanned image $ scanimage

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

Hi Roger, thank you for your thoughts! More comments below... On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Roger wrote: > In my experience, the Windows or proprietary solutions usually utilize > significant software processing after the original data is acquired from the > scan. I had

Re: [sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:02:59PM -0500, Matt Garman wrote: >TL;DR: for those of you who have migrated your document scanning >workflow from Windows to a Sane platform (e.g. Linux), what >settings/tools have you found to maintain or improve quality of >scanned documents (relative to Windows)? >

[sane-devel] Scan quality enhancements/processing (vs Windows with Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500)

TL;DR: for those of you who have migrated your document scanning workflow from Windows to a Sane platform (e.g. Linux), what settings/tools have you found to maintain or improve quality of scanned documents (relative to Windows)? Long version: I have a Fujitsu ScanScan s1500 document scanner,