Re: [sane-devel] option threshold without effect for fujitsu backend since 1.0.24-1

2016-10-08 Thread m. allan noah
I have just committed a fix in e4aed53a1e46b9d46a76f814d414ef8d2c2276e3. If you are able, I would appreciate if you could test it. allan On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:19 PM, m. allan noah wrote: > It looks like commit 96628ed13f411298ee0681e7515745fdf85d1309 is the > culprit.

Re: [sane-devel] option threshold without effect for fujitsu backend since 1.0.24-1

2016-10-05 Thread m. allan noah
It looks like commit 96628ed13f411298ee0681e7515745fdf85d1309 is the culprit. This change enabled the image processing functions by default, but that seems to have disabled the threshold algorithm in the scanner. I will look for an alternative implementation. allan On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:49

Re: [sane-devel] option threshold without effect for fujitsu backend since 1.0.24-1

2016-10-04 Thread m. allan noah
Mickael, thank you for the report. I thought I had fixed this problem previously, but I am apparently wrong. I will investigate. allan On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, PELUARD Mickael wrote: > Hello, > > > > we used Fujitsu scanner (fi-5110 /