I have just committed a fix in
e4aed53a1e46b9d46a76f814d414ef8d2c2276e3. If you are able, I would
appreciate if you could test it.
allan
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:19 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> It looks like commit 96628ed13f411298ee0681e7515745fdf85d1309 is the
> culprit.
It looks like commit 96628ed13f411298ee0681e7515745fdf85d1309 is the
culprit. This change enabled the image processing functions by
default, but that seems to have disabled the threshold algorithm in
the scanner. I will look for an alternative implementation.
allan
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:49
Mickael, thank you for the report. I thought I had fixed this problem
previously, but I am apparently wrong. I will investigate.
allan
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, PELUARD Mickael
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> we used Fujitsu scanner (fi-5110 /