> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 06:10:36AM +0100, Gjermund ??? Gusland Thorsen wrote:
>This sounds like a dream come true. Can you please enlighten the other printer
>manufacturers?
One of the main reasons I have not purchased any of their Plustek film
scanners.
--
Roger
Hi,
I am the software PM from Plustek Inc. We are a major scanner manufacturer
in Taiwan. We meet many linux driver support requests from our customers.
Linux has many distributions and versions and also sane too, we need put
many RD resources to porting our driver to many version now. It's
On 01/11/16 21:11, Richard Ryniker wrote:
...
What happens when Plustek builds a new scanner? Who will want to go
through new Plustek code and do this again, when they have other things
to do?
A better alternative is to have Plustek adapt their code to SANE. Surely
...
Would be good to
>Isn't requiring anything beyond the point 1 a teensy bit over-reaching?
Regarding binary stuff, no. If some blob of firmware must be delivered
to the scanner, this firmware must be made available under terms that
allow it to be copied and used by anyone who wishes to have SANE operate
with a
Hi Klaus & Michael,
I haven't been using my scanner (Reflecta Crystalscan 7200) for quite some
time, but when I recently installed Ubuntu 16.04, I decided to check whether
the backend available from https://github.com/kkaempf/sane-backends works. I'm
afraid it does not.
With the available
On 01/11/16 14:37, m. allan noah wrote:
Jenson- The SANE project certainly could accept your code for
inclusion into our repository, if a few conditions are met. Namely:
1. The code must be completely open and suitable for use with our
license. No binary or precompiled code, other than possible
Jenson- The SANE project certainly could accept your code for
inclusion into our repository, if a few conditions are met. Namely:
1. The code must be completely open and suitable for use with our
license. No binary or precompiled code, other than possible firmware
uploads.
2. The code must use
