Chris Wysopal cwyso...@veracode.com wrote:
In certain cases like aircraft where the economic pain of failure
is high you get DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and
Equipment Certification. For that type of software you might see the
purchase of highly reliable libraries
Since the Power that Be let me post my plea for job help, I figured
I'd let y'all know the outcome.
Long story short, I have accepted a position at Comcast, in the
National Engineering and Technical Operations group, in Herndon VA
(possibly moving to Reston VA soonish), starting in probably a
Andreas Saurwein Franci Gonçalves saurw...@gmail.com wrote
(rearranged into correct order):
2009/10/13 Bobby Miller b.g.mil...@gmail.com
The obvious difference is parts. In manufacturing, things are assembled
from well-known, well-specified, tested parts. Hmmm
Thats the idea of
Goertzel, Karen [USA]goertzel_ka...@bah.com wrote:
If determination of functional correctness were extended from must
operate as specified under expected conditions to must operate as
specified under all conditions, functional correctness would necessarily
require security, safety, fault
ljknews ljkn...@mac.com wrote:
At 12:47 PM -0500 5/7/09, Brad Andrews wrote:
Quoting ljknews ljkn...@mac.com:
At 5:49 PM -0500 5/6/09, Brad Andrews wrote:
Try a few of the PC-Lint bugs, if you ever wrote C/C++ code.
They can be really hard to figure out,
And yet people keep choosing those
Paco Hope p...@cigital.com wrote:
just as overly-simplistic as
someone who disparages all credentials equally.
On that note... my company (BAE Systems) has been pushing for people
to become CISSPs, because in turn the main client (US gov) has been
pushing for contractors to have a bunch of
Jeremy Epstein jeremy.j.epst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the creation of LAMN, the Legion Against Meaningless
certificatioNs. If you don't have a CISSP, CISM, MCSE, or EIEIO - and
you're proud of it - this group is for you.
Heh. I'm going to be giving a speech today in which
