On Jun 22, 2017, at 00:07 , WILLIAM J LUTTER wrote:
> Recently there has been the "stack-clash" exploit that impacts several OS
> including linux
>
> (CVE-2017-1000364). Unfortunately, I maintain several old SL5 PCs. For
> instance, one of them is 5.7 with a 2.6.18-419 kernel.
Which until
Not trustworthy ones
On Jun 21, 2017 6:08 PM, "WILLIAM J LUTTER" wrote:
> Recently there has been the "stack-clash" exploit that impacts several OS
> including linux
>
> (CVE-2017-1000364). Unfortunately, I maintain several old SL5 PCs. For
> instance, one of them is 5.7
Recently there has been the "stack-clash" exploit that impacts several OS
including linux
(CVE-2017-1000364). Unfortunately, I maintain several old SL5 PCs. For
instance, one of them is 5.7 with a 2.6.18-419 kernel.
I suppose that kernels for SL/Centos/Redhat kernels that would be
This particular email was sent to the errata list, but the reply-to
header is set to the users lists...
On 06/21/2017 02:47 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Aha.
Thanks for that. How many mailing lists do we need???
I got confused (not difficult at my age) as the response came on the User list.
Aha.
Thanks for that. How many mailing lists do we need???
I got confused (not difficult at my age) as the response came on the User list.
Anyway, I echo the response. The team always seems to be on top of security
issues.
Thank you (and the community) for being so friendly and helpful.
Cheers
I think that mail came from the
scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov list, so you might
have been removed from that list for some reason, but not from the users
list for example.
--
Hans Kristian Rosbach
Servebolt.com / Raske Sider
On 06/21/2017 12:41 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi. Is