Hi Troy,
does this security update also inlcude the patches for AMD Phenom II X6 CPUs
to ensure the full performance of the 6-cores CPU with activated power
management?
Here is a link to a german article on heise-online dealing with that problem:
Hi Troy,
does this security update also inlcude the patches for AMD
Phenom II X6 CPUs
to ensure the full performance of the 6-cores CPU with
activated power management?
Here is a link to a german article on heise-online dealing
with that problem:
My early testing of kernel-xen 2.6.18-164.6.1 on 3 machines (dom0 and
domU) shows no problems thus far.
Steve
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
This has escalated overnight. Luckily I only have one last test, which I
believe the kernel will pass. So test now, because this is kernel
Hello,
The new security update for SL5 has been built and is currently being
tested. This has an important security fix. But it is also the first
kernel since Update 4 that we plan on pushing out, and as such, we are
being cautious.
We plan on pushing this kernel out on Monday, November 9,
Hi Klaus,
On Oct 20, 2009, at 23:44, Klaus Steinberger wrote:
Did you have success on Xen Servers with the 164.2.1 kernel ?
Yes, 100% so far.
I did see it crashing with xend starting up. Not sure if it's
something special with my system.
No problems here. Statistics is still limited
Hi Stephan and Troy,
On Oct 2, 2009, at 18:39, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Klaus and Stephan,
Two problems I see with the kernel for 5.3.z
1 - Can't find it publically yet
I did found it now. Somebody probably missed to pack it onto the usual places.
Here it is:
Hi Troy,
On Oct 2, 2009, at 18:39, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Klaus and Stephan,
Two problems I see with the kernel for 5.3.z
1 - Can't find it publically yet
sadly, that hasn't changed, so it's not actually an option. I stopped
checking for it, and we're rolling out -164.2.1 - so far to some
Hi Troy,
did you notice, that there is probably also a errata kernel for 5.3
Sincerly,
Klaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen,
soeben erreichte uns nachfolgendes RedHat Security Advisory. Wir geben
diese Informationen unveraendert an Sie weiter.
Hi Klaus,
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:04 +0200, Klaus Steinberger wrote:
Hi Troy,
did you notice, that there is probably also a errata kernel for 5.3
yes, I think that's the one we really want. Alas, I couldn't find the
SRPM in a public place yet.
Cheers,
Stephan
Sincerly,
Klaus
I have tried this on several test machines yesterday and 6 production
machines today and it is working fine thus far.
(Xen kernel, 32 and 64 bit, plus regular kernel on my laptop, 64 bit).
Steve
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
The new security update for SL5 has been built and
On Aug 25, 2009, at 17:41, Steven Timm wrote:
I have tried this on several test machines yesterday and 6 production
machines today and it is working fine thus far.
(Xen kernel, 32 and 64 bit, plus regular kernel on my laptop, 64 bit).
The same here. We have these running on dozens of systems
Hello,
The new security update for SL5 has been built and is currently being
tested.
I plan on releasing this kernel tomorrow. But I also know that alot of
people want/need it as soon a possible, so I have put it into the
general testing area so people can install it if they want.
It is
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
With Update 3, RedHat released a new kernel. This new kernel is also a
security and bug fix kernel. I'm just a little hesitant to push it out yet
because we've often had problems with new update kernels. So I'm
Hi Troy,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
[...]
NOTE: I haven't gotten XFS (the file system) to compile yet for it.
Removing the now conflicting definitions from the xfs header seems correct
to me. Something
Stephan Wiesand wrote:
Hi Troy,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
[...]
NOTE: I haven't gotten XFS (the file system) to compile yet for it.
Removing the now conflicting definitions from the xfs header seems
Hi Troy,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Stephan Wiesand wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
I now have the newer ecryptfs-utils (and ecryptfs-utils-devel) in the
testing area.
There's a similar issue with cpuspeed. The new conflict doesn't work
because they missed that
Hello,
With Update 3, RedHat released a new kernel. This new kernel is also a
security and bug fix kernel. I'm just a little hesitant to push it out yet
because we've often had problems with new update kernels. So I'm putting it in
the testing area and asking you all to give it a try.
It's
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
With Update 3, RedHat released a new kernel. This new kernel is also a
security and bug fix kernel. I'm just a little hesitant to push it out yet
because we've often had problems with new update kernels. So I'm putting it
in the testing area
18 matches
Mail list logo
