Troy Dawson wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Takashi Ichihara wrote:
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is the wrong /etc/issue an oversight in
the upgrade, or does it indicate
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Takashi Ichihara wrote:
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is the wrong
Takashi Ichihara wrote:
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is the wrong /etc/issue an oversight in
the
John Summerfield wrote:
Takashi Ichihara wrote:
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is the wrong
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
snip
I'm looking into this.
The original RHEL5 x86_64 had both perl.i386 and perl.x86_64. I know we had
left the perl.i386 in SL 5.2 because of this upgrade problem.
But with Update 3, there were several packages that changed arch, so I really
need to
Jon Peatfield wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
snip
I'm looking into this.
The original RHEL5 x86_64 had both perl.i386 and perl.x86_64. I know we had
left the perl.i386 in SL 5.2 because of this upgrade problem.
But with Update 3, there were several packages that changed arch,
