-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        [NPHC] Americans Are Closing the Book on Reading, Study Finds



Bad news for all the authors among you....


<http://chronicle.com/>http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/11/742n.htm

Monday, November 19, 2007

*Americans Are Closing the Book on Reading, Study Finds*

By JENNIFER HOWARD

Americans aren't just reading fewer books, but are reading less and less 
of everything, in any medium. That's the doleful conclusion of "To Read 
or Not to Read," a _report_ <http://www.arts.gov/pub/pubLit.php> 
scheduled for release today by the National Endowment for the Arts.

Subtitled "A Question of National Consequence," the report piles on the 
bad news delivered by "Reading at Risk," the NEA's 2004 warning about 
the nation's rapidly declining literacy (/_The Chronicle,_/ 
<http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i45/45a00101.htm> July 16, 2004).

"The story the data tell is simple, consistent, and alarming," writes 
Dana Gioia. the NEA's chairman, in the new report's preface. 
Elementary-school children have posted some gains in literacy, but 
"there is a general decline in reading among teenage and adult Americans."

"Most alarming," he continues, "both reading ability and the habit of 
regular reading have greatly declined among college graduates."

Unlike the 2004 study, "To Read or Not to Read" examined not just 
literary reading but all kinds of reading, including online. And it 
tapped a far wider range of sources, notably statistics from the 
Department of Education and the Department of Labor, as well as academic 
and corporate studies.

None of it adds up to good news for the written word. Just how 
reading-averse have Americans become? In 2006, the study found, 
15-to-24-year-olds spent just seven minutes on voluntary reading on 
weekdays� 10 minutes on Saturdays and Sundays. They found time to 
watch two to two-and-a-half hours of television daily.

Older and presumably wiser� or at least more bookish� 
generations didn't do much better. In 2006 people ages 35 to 44 devoted 
only 12 minutes a day to reading. Even the best-read group, Americans 65 
and older, logged less than an hour each weekday and just over an hour 
on weekends.

"This study shows that reading is endangered at the moment in the United 
States, especially among younger Americans," Mr. Gioia said during a 
telephone news conference announcing the report.

*Drop in Proficiency*

When Americans do manage to read something, whether it's a book or a 
blog, more and more of us can't do it well. The proportion of 12th 
graders reading at or above the proficient level fell significantly from 
1992 to 2005, from 40 percent� hardly a robust number to begin 
with� to 35 percent. Meanwhile, during roughly the same period, 
the share of college graduates who could reliably find their way through 
a piece of prose declined by 23 percent. If you think your master's or 
doctorate renders you immune to the national decline, think again: Even 
Americans who have studied at the graduate level saw their reading 
skills atrophy: 51 percent were rated proficient readers in 1992, but 
only 41 percent made that grade in 2003.

Aside from making authors, publishers, and librarians weep, what do 
those dismal numbers mean for the nation? "These negative trends have 
more than literary importance," Mr. Gioia writes in the preface. "As 
this report makes clear, the declines have demonstrable social, 
economic, cultural, and civic implications."

The report confirms that poor readers tend to make poor students, who 
become poorly paid workers. Twenty percent of American workers don't 
read at the level required by their jobs. In 2003, 58 percent of 
proficient readers earned at least $850 a week; only 13 percent of 
below-basic readers did.

That reality hasn't been lost on employers, 38 percent of whom say 
high-school graduates don't measure up when it comes to reading 
comprehension. And those employers are shelling out large 

amounts� an estimated $3.1-billion among corporations, for 
instance� for remedial training.

*A 'Distracted' Society*

The study does not dwell on what's to blame, but it makes ominous 
references to multitasking and to "the omnipresence of electronic media."

"You become distracted as a society," said Mr. Gioia in the news 
conference. "I don't think, in a country that publishes 100,000 books a 
year, the problem is that people can't find something they want to read."

Absorbing one negative statistic after another, one wonders why the NEA 
didn't name the report "Requiem for Reading." Mr. Gioia understands the 
cumulative disheartening effect. "It's easy to read the data as a 
negative story, and the trends are almost consistently down," he told 
reporters.

But he refused to give in to despair: "Is this a cultural apocalypse? No."

He made a game attempt to find a silver lining, observing that the 
report highlights "the crucial importance that reading has on individual 
lives and community lives and collectively on the national life." 
Reading, he said, "really seems to be a transformational behavior that 
changes your life's course."

The numbers show that good readers make better citizens. They volunteer 
more. They go to art museums more. And, defying stereotype, they even 
exercise and play sports more.

"'To Read or Not to Read' is not an elegy for the death of print culture 
but a call to action, that this nation is losing an invaluable human 
resource that it cannot afford to lose," Mr. Gioia said.

Like its 2004 predecessor, however, "To Read or Not to Read" calls for a 
national debate about the crisis but does not offer strategies or solutions.

"The conversation is more important than the dictates of a small 
cultural agency," Mr. Gioia responded when asked why the NEA had been 
reluctant to dispense advice. "I'm not a cockeyed optimist, but I do 
believe that if the United States believes that something is important, 
it can make it happen."

The chairman added, "If Oprah Winfrey can get Leo Tolstoy's/ Anna 
Karenina/ on the best-seller list, anything is possible in this country






Community email addresses:
Post message: SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subscribe Digest Mode: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SciFiNoir_Lit/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SciFiNoir_Lit/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SciFiNoir_Lit/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to