On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:57:20PM -0700, David Corcoran wrote:
Hello,
You can't use pcsc-lite-0.9.1 for remote use of the resource manager. I
wanted to create the core package as local only. I'm working on an RPC
like service that sits atop the local service which will export the PC/SC
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:57:20PM -0700, David Corcoran wrote:
Hello,
You can't use pcsc-lite-0.9.1 for remote use of the resource manager. I
wanted to create the core package as local only. I'm working on an RPC
like service that sits
For accessing remote computers (which the original query was about)
something like ssh or secure telnet using smart card based keys
for authentication would be more appropriate.
Of course what you really want is for the session to be secure all the way
to the card, not just to the
Hi,
I think the PCSC is good enough if it enables access
to the local smartcard to local proceses, and
verifies that the user has UNIX permission to use the
smartcard reader (for instance if /tmp/.pcsctx anc
/tmp/.pcscrx are accessibe to the user).
For remote authentication, a client/server
Definitely. The interface exported must be a subset of the
available functionality or else someone could write a worm which does a
Verify Key function incorrectly and blocks cards where services are
available. A signature function must be carefully exported and
authenticated to so it does not
