Carlos Prados [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a suggestion: for distributting clean tar.gz
source packages with only system-independent files
(f.i. without generated makefiles, dependencies and
configurations that are created on you machine), you
should run:
$ make distcheck
This
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:32:47AM +0200 Esben Haabendal Soerensen
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes, something is wrong with the top-level Makefile.in in
pcsc-lite-0.9.1. But there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the
Makefile.am (although it needs some cleanup). If I run the ./reconf
From src/Makefile.am:
libpcsclite_core_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:2:0 -lfl -ldl
libpcsclite_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:1:0
How much thought have been put into the above library versioning ?
A good description of what the numbers mean can be found in the
Versioning section of the libtool
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:25:57PM +0200 Esben Haabendal Soerensen
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From src/Makefile.am:
libpcsclite_core_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:2:0 -lfl -ldl
libpcsclite_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:1:0
How much thought have been put into the above library versioning ?
Hi Matthias,
I'm preparing RPMs for SuSE Linux, and I run ./reconf, too,
because I got some problems with the original distributed files.
(we are using automake 1.4 and autoconf 2.13, too).
Wird die MUSCLE Software+Treiber in der nächste Version
von SuSE Linux dabie sein?
--
Mit
Hello,
Esben has provided a patch to look at for pcsc-lite-0.9.1 for
autoconf/automake. It was too large (4000 chars) so it bounced to me.
It can be viewed at:
http://www.linuxnet.com/middleware/files/patch-pcsc.txt
Thanks to everyone for their help.
Dave
Hi,
I see the package finally includes autoconf/automake
stuff. I congratulate for it :-)
Just a suggestion: for distributting clean tar.gz
source packages with only system-independent files
(f.i. without generated makefiles, dependencies and
configurations that are created on you machine),
Hi,
I see that the middleware software section only lists the pcsc-lite version
0.4.0, does that mean that
the resource manager is now included in the pcsc-lite distribution?
What and where is pcsc-full?
Thanx
David Corcoran wrote:
Hello,
I released some new software on the site.
This is correct. The resource manager is now included with pcsc-lite. I
removed pcsc-full because it was very large and hard to maintain and I
didn't write it in a modular fashion so it could be broken apart depending
on what features were wanted. Lite compiles in about 10 seconds compared
to
