Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-08 Thread Peter Tomlinson
On 7 June 2001 Carlos Prados wrote Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question Hi, It seems, therefore, that changing the value of Di in the ATR does not change the value of the wwt, but changing the value of Fi does. Is this what the writers of 7816-3:1997 meant? I don't think so

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-07 Thread Carlos Prados
Hi, Thanks Peter for your great explanation. 7816-3:1997 section 8.2 on work waiting time: wwt = 960 * WI * (Fi / f) This is exactly what I get doning variable substitution and symplification in the formula that comes in ISO 7816-3: 1992. [snip] It seems, therefore, that changing the

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-02 Thread Jim Rees
I'm not sure how to calculate this value when etu = 1/9600 s (default value when there is no PTS): My interpretation of 7816-3 is that it should be a) wwt = 960 * WI * F / 3571200 But I could be wrong. In particular, Cyberflex almost always requires a longer wwt, and I usually set my

Re: MUSCLE Work Waiting Time question

2001-06-02 Thread Peter Tomlinson
Carlos, Use the current (1997) edition of 7816-3, not the obsolete (1989) edition. Its still not easy to do the calculations, so readers of this note should check it over carefully. 7816-3:1997 section 8.2 on work waiting time: wwt = 960 * WI * (Fi / f) f = card clock frequency - let us