* Brian Kroth had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 12:14:43 -0600]:
Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com 2009-12-22 10:42:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
ima...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the
current
Oh, and also, the number of text-attribute-changes in the
caption/hardstaus has also been increased to 256.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=screen.git;a=commitdiff;h=e6a28cf8bfdac15faa6c267bf476ddcaddf48d67;hp=f33e5cdecb7bf3b6ae8e4a5c0ca394dd5a06a416
Cheers,
Sadrul
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:29:47PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/screen/
screen-4.0.2-maxstr.patch
It looks like MAXSTR has been increased to 512. It can still be increased
more, of course. Is there a bug-report somewhere that requested
* Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [20 Dec 2009, 21:18:04 -0600]:
[snip]
33increase_max_winmsg_renditions.dpatch
I think 256 is a bit too excessive. I am going to increase it to 128
instead, which I honestly think should be more than enough.
Hmm, what's the actual cost? Some memory?
* Miroslav Lichvar had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 10:35:00 +0100]:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:19:00PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
non-trivial amount
To Dustin/Sadrul:
So long as we're considering some changes, can I petition to have the
default MAXWIN increased from 40 to 99 (or higher)?
We have a screenrc for our ssh bastion host that sets up 40 ssh
sessions by default and we always end up recompiling screen to support
this.
Thanks,
Brian
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Brian Kroth bpkr...@gmail.com wrote:
So long as we're considering some changes, can I petition to have the
default MAXWIN increased from 40 to 99 (or higher)?
We have a screenrc for our ssh bastion host that sets up 40 ssh
sessions by default and we always end
* Miroslav Lichvar had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 10:35:00 +0100]:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:19:00PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
non-trivial amount
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
thinking if this list is the best place to reach the packagers.
Cheers,
Sadrul
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
ima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
thinking if this
* Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [09 Dec 2009, 10:37:17 -0800]:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
ima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I
11 matches
Mail list logo
