Crap ... how did this happen? *facepalm* Ok lets re roll. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Jeffrey Palmer <jeffrey.t.pal...@gmail.com>wrote:
> There were many changes in 2.538 that weren't in 2.537_02 (see attached > diff). Was this intentional? I'm concerned that these might be > responsible for the test failures. Should we revert to the previous > release (plus the documentation fixes) and slowly add these changes in new > dev releases or should we just work on fixing the new problems? > > Jeff > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Kartik Thakore > <thakore.kar...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> And we have some fails! >> >> SDL-2.538: >> - MSWin32-x64-multi-thread / 5.14.2: >> - FAIL >> >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/26ee8b64-6bf6-1014-ad3c-44931eecb6a3 >> >> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.15.8: >> - FAIL >> >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/5bd4ba90-a46b-11e1-a210-b03bf4b14d39 >> >> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.15.9: >> - FAIL >> >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a5aaaff4-a46a-11e1-8dfd-c832f4b14d39 >> > > > >
