Re: Catch All Mail Account

2001-10-03 Thread Mike Chambers
Have you tried putting something like @domain.com:user-here, into your aliases file and running newaliases? Something to that affect could possibly work. I've never tried it myself but I've seen discussions on it on different mailing lists. Mike - Original Message - From: Gregory

Any comment on these CD burners?

2001-10-03 Thread Giovanni Rizzardi
It is 6 months I'm using HP 9150i without any problem. Regards, Giovanni. -- * Ing. Giovanni Rizzardi Italy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the

Re: Poweroff with redhat vs. generic kernels

2001-10-03 Thread star
Did you try to type poweroff or you can even make a item in the KDE-K-bar? This works fine, without questions, whether I really want to shutdown. Steffen I am having a problem and was wondering if someone could shed some light on it for me. Can anyone explain to me why my machine will only

NIC/driver combos rated?

2001-10-03 Thread David Richardson
Has anyone done research or comparisons that would gauge performance of 10/100 Ethernet NICs and their recent drivers for RH7.1 systems? I've a suspicion that my LinkSYS LNE100TX isn't performing well, even with module options to force full-duplex and linkspeed. thanks in advance for links

Re: Re:Re SMTP not accepting my outgoing mail In-Reply-To=3BA91D80.2E59DD4A@gmx.de

2001-10-03 Thread Josep M.
Hello. add in /etc/mail/access these line 10.255.6.235 RELAY and later execute in /etc/mail directory makemap hash access.db access then restart sendmail...it´s all! If not,put your sendmail config file here and we will see:) Josep. Begin of Quote Selvi : I have done as u written.

Re: Slow FTP Connection?

2001-10-03 Thread Josep M.
Hello. Do you have your IP and machine name in both networks in your /etc/hosts file? Josep Begin of Quote Svavar Örn Eysteinsson : Hello. I'm having a strange problem with my ftp server, not a problem maby a bug. My FTP server is running the latest Kernel 2.4.10 and ProFTPD in Xinetd mode.

Re: NIC/driver combos rated?

2001-10-03 Thread Steve Snyder
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 11:16 am, David Richardson wrote: Has anyone done research or comparisons that would gauge performance of 10/100 Ethernet NICs and their recent drivers for RH7.1 systems? I've a suspicion that my LinkSYS LNE100TX isn't performing well, even with module options to

Specify memory in printer?

2001-10-03 Thread Steve Snyder
Is there a way and/or reason to inform lpd of the amount of installed memory in my LaserJet printer? In other operating systems (Win9x and OS/2, in my experience) the LaserJet drivers allow you to specify the amount of installed RAM. Presumably this is to acheive better performance in

[Solved] could not find Red Hat Linux CDROM

2001-10-03 Thread Francisco Neira
Hi, After several failed attemps to install Seawolf (7.1) I tried with Cartman (6.1) and succeeded! Seems that my burned ISO image of Seawolf is wrong :-( What I can't understand is how I installed Seawolf on other PCs notebooks using the same CDs :-? Thanks a lot everybody for your help!

blocking morpheus server

2001-10-03 Thread Jochen Kächelin
How can I tell my firewall (iptables) not to allow the win98 workstations to connect with the morpheus servers in order to download mp3?? -- WA-P, Jochen Kächelin Programmierung - Beratung - Hosting Tel. 07161 - 92 95 94 / Fax 07161 - 92 95 98 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Charles Curley
Memo to Red Hat Engineering: The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that I have given up trying to understand it. Please simplify it to that we mere mortal paying customers (you know, the folks who pay your salary) can understand and use it. Or document it, however

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Charles Curley wrote: Memo to Red Hat Engineering: The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that I have given up trying to understand it. Please simplify it to that we mere mortal paying customers (you know, the folks who pay your salary) can

Max number of processes

2001-10-03 Thread Matthias Saou
Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble on some loaded web servers. Having recompiled apache after raising it's upper possible limit of processes, once it reaches a bit more than 400 processes, my shell goes berzerk, forks are impossible... a real mess. I suppose there must be a kernel parameter that

Re: Max number of processes

2001-10-03 Thread Matthias Saou
Once upon a time, Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble on some loaded web servers. Having recompiled apache after raising it's upper possible limit of processes, once it reaches a bit more than 400 processes, my shell goes berzerk, forks are

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:57:10PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: CC == Charles Curley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: CC The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that CC I have given up trying to understand it. You could at least tell them what on Earth you mean

Re: Max number of processes

2001-10-03 Thread Christopher Keller
On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 11:19, Matthias Saou wrote: Once upon a time, Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble on some loaded web servers. Having recompiled apache after raising it's upper possible limit of processes, once it reaches a bit more than 400

RE: Tuning RedHat Kernel

2001-10-03 Thread Jesse Noller
I'd personally be interested in tuning for speed increases with the disk i/o , tcp stack, and basic webserver functionality. Jesse Noller Linux Fiend Macromedia Server Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian: God help us; we're in the hands of engineers. -Jurassic Park

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Charles Curley wrote: Probably so. Is there any documentation as to how the stuff is supposed to work? I am familar with the Sys V init scripts in /etc/rc.d and the run levels. But what the heck goes on with the stuff in /etc/sysconfig? Those are conifguration files used

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Jean Francois Martinez
Charles Curley a écrit : Memo to Red Hat Engineering: The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that I have given up trying to understand it. Please simplify it to that we mere mortal paying customers (you know, the folks who pay your salary) can understand and use

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Jean Francois Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Charles Curley a écrit : Memo to Red Hat Engineering: The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that I have given up trying to understand it. Please simplify it to that we mere mortal paying customers (you know,

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Jean Francois Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am a mortal and I consider that initilization trivial: Bt (basketball buzzer) Mortals don't use the word trivial... :-) ___ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: saint needs perl

2001-10-03 Thread Rick Forrister
Paul Dawson wrote: Hello, I am trying to install saint and it says: error: failed dependencies: /bin/perl is needed by saint-3.3.4-1 but then I do a rpm -qa |grep perl and get groff-perl-1.16.1-7 perl-5.6.0-12 mod_perl-1.24_01-2 perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-4 so I know perl

RE: saint needs perl

2001-10-03 Thread Taylor, ForrestX
Hello, I am trying to install saint and it says: error: failed dependencies: /bin/perl is needed by saint-3.3.4-1 but then I do a rpm -qa |grep perl and get groff-perl-1.16.1-7 perl-5.6.0-12 mod_perl-1.24_01-2 perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-4 so I know perl is installed.

Re: saint needs perl

2001-10-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
On 2001-10-03, Paul Dawson wrote: I am trying to install saint and it says: error: failed dependencies: /bin/perl is needed by saint-3.3.4-1 but then I do a rpm -qa |grep perl and get groff-perl-1.16.1-7 perl-5.6.0-12 mod_perl-1.24_01-2 perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-4 so I know perl is

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread J. Dow
Charles Curley a écrit : Memo to Red Hat Engineering: The initialization code has gotten so complicated and so confusing that I have given up trying to understand it. Please simplify it to that we mere mortal paying customers (you know, the folks who pay your salary) can understand and

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread J. Dow
From: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] In my setup there are 592 lines in the scripts in /etc/init.d that begin with a `#' many of these are Author or script names or other non-explanatory comments. Not sure how many, but a rough guess might be around 139 And so far I have not found an

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:29:27PM -0400, Erik Troan wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: One thing that would help would be to heavily comment all init scripts. Maybe this isn't done because they change frequently or maybe it is just assumed that any one paging thru them will

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Charles Curley
Erik, I should add to the comments I just fired off that they are not intended as an attack, on you personally, or anyone else. The are the result of a very frustrating day. Much of that frustration, alas, was due to a lack of documentation. On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:29:27PM -0400, Erik Troan

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread J. Dow
From: Erik Troan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frankly, someone who hasn't seen more then .bat files shouldn't be changing those files. Reading them, with the aid of a decent book on shell programming, shouldn't be that hard. 1) Sometimes ya gotta. 2) Whatinell IS ja_JP.eucJP. (OK, I can make a clever

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
J. Dow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: runlevels it executes /etc/rc.d/rc with runelevel as an argument. This will scan the /etc/rc.d/rc.newlevel directory looking for entries obeginning with K and execute them by giving thrm stop as an argument. Not quite. It won't restart the

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, J. Dow wrote: 2) Whatinell IS ja_JP.eucJP. (OK, I can make a clever guess that it is one of the Japanese language formats.) So a brief one line explanation If it is Japanese we frobnitz the freebleblaster to get better grommiting would be REALLY nice. It saves on

Re: NIC/driver combos rated?

2001-10-03 Thread Jack Bowling
** Reply to message from David Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:16:26 -0400 Has anyone done research or comparisons that would gauge performance of 10/100 Ethernet NICs and their recent drivers for RH7.1 systems? I've a suspicion that my LinkSYS LNE100TX isn't performing

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Christopher Keller
On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 14:29, Erik Troan wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: It's not done because we're understaffed, and just haven't had time. We agree that it should be done, fwiw. Eric, This may open up another can of worms, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a procedure for

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On 3 Oct 2001, Christopher Keller wrote: This may open up another can of worms, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a procedure for people to submit documention changes back to redhat? Usually I ream the developers for shipping a shoddy product, but since linux is much more of a communal

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Erik Troan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: One thing that would help would be to heavily comment all init scripts. Maybe this isn't done because they change frequently or maybe it is just assumed that any one paging thru them will be able to follow the

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
CK == Christopher Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: CK Is there a procedure for people to submit documention changes back to CK redhat? Open a bug/enhancement request in bugzilla and attach a patch? That way it gets associated with a particular package, gets sent to the proper developer(s)

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread J. Dow
From: Erik Troan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) Whatinell IS ja_JP.eucJP. (OK, I can make a clever guess that it is one of the Japanese language formats.) So a brief one line explanation If it is Japanese we frobnitz the freebleblaster to get better grommiting would be REALLY nice. It

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Chris Kloiber
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, J. Dow wrote: From: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] In my setup there are 592 lines in the scripts in /etc/init.d that begin with a `#' many of these are Author or script names or other non-explanatory comments. Not sure how many, but a rough guess might be around

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: Since it is so basic one should have no trouble explaining what is happening there. You may find you need to know what $NOLOCALE refers to. OOOPs .. no referernce to it anywhere in this script accept in this if clause. Now what condition might

Re: Memo to Red Hat Engineering

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Chris Kloiber wrote: Do you mean this stuff?: # chkconfig: 345 56 50 These are default values for chkconfig. If I understand it properly this means (in this case) this script is on by default at runlevels 3, 4, and 5 Starting order is 56

Re: As a member of the peanut gallery...

2001-10-03 Thread Erik Troan
On 3 Oct 2001, Brian Gonzales wrote: Hmmpf, Microsquish never sent me a hat... Would you really want one? With that ugly logo on it? Ick. Erik --- |Who is John Galt? - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand

Re: (OT?) XFree86 -config

2001-10-03 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Maxim Belous wrote: Sorry for probable offtopic, but I hope it won't take much time to answer my question, if someone has a necessary experience. I've just upgraded XFree86 4.0.3 (standard for Seawolf distro) to XFree 4.1.0 taken in binaries from its home site. It works

Re: configure unsupported video card in X?

2001-10-03 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anybody tell me how to make an unsupported video card work in X window? Well... an unsupported video card, is just that - unsupported. Short of buying a new card, is there anything else I can do? Yep, obtain the technical specifications for the

RE: Max number of processes

2001-10-03 Thread Jai Shinde
Hi, Below are the some points which U can try out. 1. vi /proc/sys/fs/file-max :-- Increase this parameter by calcuating RAM. I mean if U have 128 MB RAM, as for every 256 it takes 4mb. so for 128/4=32, which again 256*32=8192 2. echo 32768 61000 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range. where

Re: Minimum 32 MB RAM

2001-10-03 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Jason Montleon wrote: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:45:42 -0400 From: Jason Montleon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Minimum 32 MB RAM Is there anyway to override the minimum 32 MB

Re: Micron Netframe LV2000

2001-10-03 Thread Craig White
No takers? Craig White wrote: MBD001094-00 Motherboard Model: Intel R440LX Form Factor:ATX specification v.2.0 Expansion Slots:(5) Five total slots; (4) Four PCI slots ; (1) One Shared PCI/ISA Chipset:Intel 440LX Chipset Intel 82443LX PAC, Intel

Excel 97 and Word 972000 replacement

2001-10-03 Thread Andrew Smith
Well, I'm sure someone else has already done this. If not - then I'll do it and post a follow up here in the future. Anyone worked out for certain what Linux free products can handle Execl 97 files correctly (and fully)? Also the same for Word 97 and Word 2000 I want to remove my last

RE: Excel 97 and Word 972000 replacement

2001-10-03 Thread Green, Aaron
This may be a stupid answer, but have you tried Star Office by Sun Microsystems? I just say that b/c I automaticly think everyone in Linux knows about it. -- From: Andrew Smith[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001

Re: Excel 97 and Word 972000 replacement

2001-10-03 Thread Bill Hartwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 03 October 2001 23:41, Andrew Smith wrote: Well, I'm sure someone else has already done this. If not - then I'll do it and post a follow up here in the future. Anyone worked out for certain what Linux free products can handle Execl