*-unsubscribe

2004-08-19 Thread rajat mehta
Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could this be the same problem as was discussed in the following thread?http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=365197Cheers,BerinMats T Pettersson wrote:> My project uses Java and the toolkit Apache XML Security version 1.1 f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30764] - JDK 1.4.2_05 has new org.apache.xpath.compiler api... now private m_functions field

2004-08-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30764] New: - JDK 1.4.2_05 has new org.apache.xpath.compiler api... now private m_functions field

2004-08-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

XML detached signature

2004-08-19 Thread Matej Kafadar
Hi, When I create or verify detached XML signature with URI="file:/doc.txt", Java XMLsec library sign file in path "c:/doc.txt". Can URI hold relative path? How URI would look like to XMLsec verify doc.txt which is in the same folder that is signature? Thanks matej

Re: XMLSecurity interop .NET

2004-08-19 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Could this be the same problem as was discussed in the following thread? http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=365197 Cheers, Berin Mats T Pettersson wrote: My project uses Java and the toolkit Apache XML Security version 1.1 for Java to digitally sign and v

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-08-19 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 2 p

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-08-19 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 2 p