RE: Java xmlsec still contains base64 bug

2004-02-21 Thread Scott Cantor
> For now I've fixed the bug in CVS - probably best to not introduce > anything majorly new until after 1.1. Thanks much. I'm hoping to be able to ship the next Shibboleth/OpenSAML releases with the 1.1 versions of both languages, this will give me additional incentive. ;-) -- Scott

Re: Java xmlsec still contains base64 bug

2004-02-20 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott/Erwin, For now I've fixed the bug in CVS - probably best to not introduce anything majorly new until after 1.1. Cheers, Berin Erwin van der Koogh wrote: With the talk of a release, I'd note that the Java Base64 encoder in the utility class is still adding an extra linefeed when th

Re: Java xmlsec still contains base64 bug

2004-02-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 (non-binding) :) --- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erwin van der Koogh wrote: > > >> With the talk of a release, I'd note that the Java Base64 encoder in the > >> utility class is still adding an extra linefeed when the encoded data > >> ends > >> up exactly on a line wrap boundar

Re: Java xmlsec still contains base64 bug

2004-02-16 Thread Axl Mattheus
Erwin van der Koogh wrote: With the talk of a release, I'd note that the Java Base64 encoder in the utility class is still adding an extra linefeed when the encoded data ends up exactly on a line wrap boundary (e.g. last line of 72 chars if wrap length is 72). This is treated as invalid by the X

Re: Java xmlsec still contains base64 bug

2004-02-15 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
With the talk of a release, I'd note that the Java Base64 encoder in the utility class is still adding an extra linefeed when the encoded data ends up exactly on a line wrap boundary (e.g. last line of 72 chars if wrap length is 72). This is treated as invalid by the Xerces C++ base64 data type val