Heads up everyone using (S)MW with ElasticSearch!
Markus
Forwarded Message
Subject: [MediaWiki-l] [Security vulnerability] Log4j zero-day exploit
info for CirrusSearch and Semantic MediaWiki ElasticStore
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:46:40 -0600
From: Jeffrey Wang
Hi Michael,
The data model of SMW never considered "insertion order" as a piece of
information that should be recorded. In fact, a normal SQL RDBMs like
MariaDB has no obligation to return tuples in a specific order unless
there is an ordering clause in the query. Same for SPARQL. Relying on
Hi,
In a rare response to this email list, I have to completely back James
here. The request sounds a bit too much as if we are talking about a
rescheduling of Ubuntu or some other large project. It is important to
keep perspective here. For small projects like this, the simple rule is
that
Impressive feature list. Congratulations to all SMW devs and
contributors on this achievement!
Cheers,
Markus
On 15.03.2017 17:08, [[kgh]] wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we are happy to announce the immediate availability of the Semantic
> MediaWiki 2.5.0 release: [0,1]. This is a big release
Dear Andreas,
The purpose of these was to ensure that the RDF export of SMW is
well-behaved and also valid in OWL. Many tools would find it hard to
digest if you would declare a property to be, e.g., a subproperty of
rdfs:range.
Unfortunately, rdf and rdfs in particular contain a lot of
Hi,
I would not consider this journal for publication. Warning signs:
"Google-based impact factor", special issues on random topics that have
no clear focus, missing or unknown guest editors, editorial board
members unknown in respective community, prominent publication fees,
rather weak
On 29.06.2015 17:16, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi Jason,
If you're talking about making a change to the semantic data of a page
that is not reflected in that page's wikitext, that sounds like a bad
idea - the new data would be removed as soon as the page was edited and
saved again.
Indeed, one has
Hi John,
Sounds interesting, but I don't think I fully understand the
functionality yet. In particular, how is the data that is thus recorded
related to the DC vocabulary? For example, dc:title is a property with
the URI http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title. Is this URI then used in
the RDF
On 06.04.2015 03:57, Yaron Koren wrote:
I'm guessing that it's possible, yes. I hadn't really considered that
possibility, though there certainly is an argument for doing it that
way. I should note that Browse properties, too, shows up for pages
that contain no properties - for those
On 10.11.2014 17:59, James HK wrote:
Hi,
Well, smw.referata.com is the community wiki and smw.org is the
official website of the extension. But maybe it is time to re-consider
if that separation is really that useful?
I wasn't aware that such distinction actually exists and users are
Hi Frank, hi Mark, hi all,
The post below reminded me of how incredibly useful mStripState is when
implementing parser hooks. It can be used to unstrip things (like
nowiki) but also to insert things like nowiki (e.g. to insert unsafe
HTML from within a parser function).
It seems that there is
Hi all,
I just finished work on a new website for my research group (and maybe
others). The site might be of interest, since it showcases quite a few
techniques in terms of skinning, customization, and SMW-usage:
https://ddll.inf.tu-dresden.de/
The main things to watch out for:
* Chameleon
to the history of the data model).
Special:Export is also freely available.
Cheers,
Markus
On 29.10.2014 19:03, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi all,
I just finished work on a new website for my research group (and maybe
others). The site might be of interest, since it showcases quite a few
to do, somebody recently sent me some
code I think I can use. :)
There are some rough edges left, but they are mostly related to
styling of special pages and the like and should be easy to fix
(patches welcome).
Cheers,
Stephan
On 17 October 2014 10:40, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic
Hi,
Good idea. Chameleon is great (also because of the nice Bootstrap
styling that becomes available on all pages). I am using it right now to
build a site (to be published soon).
A big advantage with Chameleon is that most customizations happen in CSS
or by inserting HTML into the page
Hi again,
I have isolated a single specimen of an infinite job cycle on my wiki.
The details are attached (I hope the attachment makes it to the list as
well). In short, the loop is triggered by an update job on a redirect
page. For some reason, the update job creates another instance of a
doubt it (the earlier presence of spurious properties about
illegal property values should not have affected the jobs). -- Markus
On 13.10.2014 11:29, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi again,
I have isolated a single specimen of an infinite job cycle on my wiki.
The details are attached (I hope
Hi,
FWIW, these strange characters are placeholders that MediaWiki inserts
into the text instead of special content (such as nowiki, math and
other tag-based functions). MW inserts these markers early on in the
parsing process (in a phase called stripping), and most extension
parser functions
On 26/05/14 14:27, Michael Erdmann wrote:
to whom it may concern.
Thanks, seems to happen whenever I am on a plane ;-) (and also the
others who can fix it seem to have been busy). The problem is unusually
frequent recently :-(
Markus
--
Dr. Michael Erdmann|erdm...@diqa-pm.com |
On 07/05/14 10:49, Krabina Bernhard wrote:
Hi,
semantic-mediawiki.org seens to be down...
Rebootet right after your email, and running again since (I did this a
few times in recent days already; cause of problem remains unclear).
Markus
, we already have a robot that alerts us.
However, someone still has to restart the machine in this case, which
can take a while depending on who is awake/at the keyboard. :-)
Markus
On May 7, 2014, at 4:59 AM, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 07/05/14 10:49, Krabina
Hi Bernhard,
Thanks for pushing this. I will prepare another Wikidata-related
submssion and I am also happy to support any SMW-related events (I will
certainly be in London).
Best regards,
Markus
On 31/03/14 09:29, Krabina Bernhard wrote:
Hi,
I just prepared a first draft of a
Ok, I give in: +1 to 2.0 :-)
Markus
On 18/01/14 19:27, Nischay Nahata wrote:
I didn't follow the full discussion but 2.0 makes more sense to me.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:15 PM, James HK jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com
mailto:jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From a
Hi,
+1 to dropping the initial 1. that will never ever change.
However, since the 1 was unchanged since we are out of beta, it seems to
me that we are currently treating the second number as our major
version. In other words, we are at version 9.0.1 and the next version
should be 10.0.0. This
On 17/01/14 15:09, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi,
Markus - are you suggesting retroactively referring to, say, version
1.5.1 as version 5.1 - with a corresponding change to all the
documentation, etc.? Or just jumping straight from version 1.9 to
version 10.0? I'm assuming the latter, but in either
, is not.
/jmc
On 11/10/2013 11:42 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi John,
The main point of my previous email was to explain that SMW does not
implement the CWA (or OWA). The terms CWA and OWA are used to
characterise knowledge representation formalisms. SMW, in contrast, is
a content
On 10/11/13 10:43, Niklas Laxström wrote:
What is OWA?
John refers to the Open World Assumption. This is an informal concept
used in knowledge representation to describe the assumption that
statements that are not made are unknown rather than false. This is
contrasted with the Closed World
On 10/11/13 13:06, Jonathan Lang wrote:
On Nov 10, 2013, at 2:33 AM, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 10/11/13 10:43, Niklas Laxström wrote:
What is OWA?
John refers to the Open World Assumption. This is an informal concept
used in knowledge representation
://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Edrummond/presentations/OWA.pdf
On 11/10/2013 2:33 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 10/11/13 10:43, Niklas Laxström wrote:
What is OWA?
John refers to the Open World Assumption. This is an informal
concept used in knowledge representation to describe the assumption
that statements
Hi Jeroen,
different answers for different questions:
+1 to have detailed release notes in the source code (and nowhere else).
The wiki will always have news items and SMW version pages that describe
the main changes in a release; the release note file in the source can
be linked from the
Hi Jeroen,
thanks for your proposal. It's very useful to revisit our infrastructure
from time to time. Since people seem quite critical so far, we should
probably have a bit more discussion
To be honest, I think that the (positive as well as negative) impact of
this decision is not as big as
Hi Jeroen,
making a writable secondary copy on GitHub is fine. It first sounded as
it you wanted to abolish our gerrit repo completely (I think this is
what people have replied to). We can also discuss this, but that will
need a bit more time. The secondary GitHub repo will be a nive way to
/support
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:11:11 +0100
From: Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
Reply-To: Discussion list for the Wikidata project.
wikidat...@lists.wikimedia.org
To: Discussion list for the Wikidata project.
wikidat...@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear Wikidatanions (*),
I have just drafted
Hi Kai,
On 10/09/13 19:22, Hüner Kai wrote:
Dear SMW developers,
I already posted this question to the SMW user group, but maybe it is more
development related.
Sorry for double posting, but I really have no idea how to proceed.
I want to use SMW (MW: 1.21.1, SMW: 1.8.0.5) together with a
On 08/08/13 13:18, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
I concur with James on the points he made.
The approach taken would make more sense if SMW was a plug in to PS, as
this is what the code makes it out to be. I'd rather see the code be
part of PS, and have it only be registered there is SMW is
Hi Michael,
what you would like to do is probably not possible in SMW right now, but
it might be possible to get it working. When using an RDF store, SMW
stores (copies of) its data there and queries the store to obtain result
lists for #ask. However, all simple data lookups are still done
/him/them consider new voting approaches if they think it makes sense.
Markus
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
Hi Desiree,
first to the second part of your message: this is really great news
Hi Desiree,
first to the second part of your message: this is really great news,
congratulations!
The not-so-great news (though it hardly matches the other) is that we
now need somebody to step up as WOTM coordinator. Before we worry about
that, let me first thank you for your work -- you did
On 11/05/13 20:35, Yury Katkov wrote:
When I use 4store as database for properties my cyrillic URLs are very
urly. Here is one of examples:
values, which will stay after
triggering SMW_refreshData.php?
c u steve
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Februar 2013 19:14
An: Lists
Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [SMW-devel] Any
Dear all,
this email is to confirm that the old database management code
SQLStore2 (which was superseded by SQLStore3 in SMW 1.8) will be
dropped in future SMW versions. This has been on our public roadmap for
some time -- I am just sending this to make everyone aware of this to
avoid
On 20/02/13 14:09, Lists wrote:
Hello,
is there any chance to get special properties (meta) into the factbox?
The Factbox is populated while parsing the page. Every meta property
that is added at this time will appear in the Factbox. As a matter of
principle, meta properties that are not
Dear developers,
change https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/50488 merges the String and Text
datatypes on all levels (user labels, datatype ids, PHP objects). This
means the following for your future code:
* Use SMWDIBlob instead of SMWDIString
* Use '_txt' instead of '_str'
For SMW 1.9, '_str'
On 23/02/13 17:36, Lists wrote:
Hello Markus and the others,
we are doing this in a SMWStore::updateDataBefore - handler. The property
shows up in the browse function not in the normal article view. If this
isn't functional how can we alter an existing property value with this
handler?
Hi,
On 05/02/13 15:21, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
(Question mainly aimed at Markus, though if you have any idea, I'd be
happy to hear it)
Why do all SMWDescription objects have an array of print requests?
In my mind a query consists out of
* A number of SMWDescription objects specifying
+1 for dropping 1.18 in 1.9.
Markus
On 02/12/12 02:43, James HK wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. You read my mind, I was just about to write a similar email as
it happens 1.18 already dropped from the official MW supporting list
[1].
[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Download
Cheers,
On 12/2/12,
Dear all,
we are happy to announce the release of the new Semantic MediaWiki
version SMW 1.8 [1]. A record number of people have contributed to this
release, and a large number of changes have been made, both visible and
internal. Major new features of SMW 1.8 include:
* New data storage:
to offer! :)
The site: http://www.culture.si/ - powered by SMW, perhaps not a bad
usecase.
best,
LF
Dne 22. 11. 2012 08:41, piše Markus Krötzsch:
Dear all,
SMW 1.8 is close to its first stable release. We have now packaged a
Release Candidate for download [1]. If all goes well
On 22/11/12 14:44, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Markus, I agree with you that in most cases you're better off doing a
sorted query, and think this should be reflected in the documentation.
I however would not be to quick to conclude the max format is
completely useless. For one thing it
On 18/11/12 13:30, Yury Katkov wrote:
Ok, I understand that: the choice is between to store or not to store
the source of the data by grouping the triples in graphs. Of course
it's up to core developers to choose.
Another set of questions:
1) how the s13n's programming interfaces for
Hi,
I would like to ask about this:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Max_format
I am afraid to say that this idea seems to be fundamentally broken. The
above page seriously suggests to find the largest population number in
the wiki by querying for a list of *all cities with and without
Mitchell wrote:
Hi Markus.
This is great news. Thanks to all involved!
I'll run it through my regression test suite over the next couple of days.
Best regards
Neill.
On 22/11/12 07:41, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Dear all,
SMW 1.8 is close to its first stable release. We have now packaged
Dear all,
SMW 1.8 is close to its first stable release. We have now packaged a
Release Candidate for download [1]. If all goes well, this will become
SMW 1.8.0 in about a week. As usual, the package includes the required
version of Validator.
Major new features include:
* New data storage:
On 16/11/12 11:27, Yury Katkov wrote:
Hi everyone!
I talked about the topic of semanticfication of the MediaWiki
extension with a lot of people in SMWCon and saw the great interest to
this topic.
We have tried to describe the problem on this page:
this information to properties: some
properties are governed by page contents, other properties are governed
in other ways. Less flexible, but no storage overhead.
Cheers,
Markus
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
Dear developers,
after two weeks of intense bugfixing, we are now getting close to the
actual SMW 1.8 release. We will probably have another release candidate
packaged soon, but as developers you might want to try the git version
now, especially to check if it runs with your own code and data.
';
in your LocalSettings (after enableSemantics(), or it will complain that
the class SMWSparqlStore is not known).
Cheers,
Markus
On 11/11/12 17:01, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Dear developers,
after two weeks of intense bugfixing, we are now getting close to the
actual SMW 1.8 release. We
On 10/11/12 19:05, Marcelo Chiaradía wrote:
Hi Yaron,
I finally discover what was wrong. It seems that if you defined your the
property in the #set_internal:, and you start it with a lower case,
and you create the property after that, for some reason the property
created start with an upper
On 07/11/12 13:44, Marcelo Chiaradía wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to make an #ask query, using intermediates results to do more
queries within.
I have this scenario:
I have several pages of a category A. Some of them are related to other
pages of category B, through a has B property.
On 09/11/12 09:37, Yury Katkov wrote:
Well you can also use template format if you don't like subqueries... It
would also help you to use the intermediate results.
That would let you see the intermediate results (otherwise, there is
no way to find out which of, say, the has C values was
need qs:
[[property1.property2::Value]]
is short for
[[property1::q[[property2::Value]]/q]]
But this won't work if you have more conditions to check in the subquery
(e.g.., categories in your case).
Markus
2012/11/9 Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
mailto:mar...@semantic
On 27/10/12 22:21, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
As most of you probably know, the Exhibit result printer is currently
rather broken and the code does not really lend itself to be maintained
or fixed. I suggest just removing it altogether from SRF.
+1
If it does not work, there is no point in
Hi,
this problem is not know (to me). A recent bugfix (bug 37575) corrected
an encoding issue (char encoding not sent when calling RDF store; could
lead to misunderstandings on the side of the store). You can try if this
fixes your problem. Testing this can be done by replacing a single file
On 21/10/12 11:13, Federico Leva wrote:
Hello,
Markus Krötzsch, 19/10/2012 08:07:
Great, thanks a lot. I hope Nemo (Federico; CC) has seen this too.
Yes, I've seen it and I've just started assigning requests to Karsten.
Note, however, that in general they are not only about documentation
prototype/thesis to the list when you have something published.
Where are you writing your thesis?
Markus
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 22/10/12 19:55, Mauricio Etchevest wrote:
Hi
?id=36608
Am 18.10.2012 10:06, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Dear SMW users developers,
we enjoy an awesome internationalisation support from translatewiki.net,
which ceaselessly translates MW extensions (and more) into a huge number
of languages.
To work smoothly, this also needs some help
On 18/10/12 23:02, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
SMW can be supplied with Mediawiki:SMW import pages that define that a
local page has a corresponding global URI. RDF export uses this
information.
Is that information available to be evaluated and displayed from
inside the wiki (especially through a
Dear SMW users developers,
we enjoy an awesome internationalisation support from translatewiki.net,
which ceaselessly translates MW extensions (and more) into a huge number
of languages.
To work smoothly, this also needs some help from the user/developer
community, since translators are
Dear developers,
after a little downtime due to our server removal, the SMWfriends code
documentation is live again:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/doc/
The docs should be updated once a day. Please let me know if any other
extension should be included there.
Cheers,
Markus
On 09/10/12 16:01, Krabina Bernhard wrote:
this will be the SMW of the year, then ;-)
Well, we will have to see if interesting uses of properties happen there
(I did not investigate the content yet). For now, the case mainly
illustrates that SMW is among the basic extensions to start new MW
and
to remove all mentioning of SF properties as soon as SF has no such
properties any more.
Markus
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 09/10/12 18:12, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi,
Nischay
On 08/10/12 15:44, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi,
I'm finally trying out SMWSQLStore3, and figuring out how to get my
extensions compatible with it, so I'm looking at the new table structure
for the first time.
First of all, is there any documentation about the design decisions that
went into this
Dear all,
as TechCrunch reports [1]:
A number of leading browser vendors and other tech companies, including
Microsoft, Google, Apple, Adobe, Facebook, HP, Nokia, Mozilla, Opera and
the W3C, just announced the launch of the Web Platform Docs project at
WebPlatform.org. The project aims to
Developers,
the below email is most relevant for developers of SF and SRF
(slideshow). It may also be of general interest to developers using
sajax in private code.
Cheers,
Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Call to eliminate sajax
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012
On 05/09/12 04:52, Laurent Alquier wrote:
Hi
Do anyone know if any results have been published about the kind of
performance improvements we can expect from this work?
Many independent improvements have been done. Most notably regarding
performance:
* significantly reduced SMW write
On 01/08/12 00:57, Benedikt Kämpgen wrote:
Hello,
I have connected a wiki to an Open Virtuoso triple store as documented in [1].
The wikis URIs have the form ...index.php?title=Page, e.g., [2].
Yet, in the triple store, URIs are stored in the form ...index.php/Page,
e.g., [3], so that
On 30/07/12 11:55, Roland Wohlfahrt wrote:
Hi folks,
I have 2 concepts in my semantic mediawiki:
concept 1:
q[[Kategorie:Kontakt]] [[Position::Amtsleiter]] OR [[Kategorie:Kontakt]]
[[Position::Amtsleiterin]]/q
concept 2:
q[[Kategorie:Kontakt]] [[Position::Amtsleiter||Amtsleiterin]]/q
On 26/07/12 15:39, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Nischay, Markus and me where discussing how to implement caching for ask
queries and inadvertently ended up discussing the whole query
invalidation project again. Since this fits in with Nischay his project
and is something I also want to poke at
On 26/07/12 16:03, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Various queries can have the same condition but different parameters
(e.g., showing it in a table vs. showing it in a list).We should only
have one cache for two queries that have the same results.
Fully agree with this. I'm proposing to cache
Yaron, what in the world do you need the DB keys for? :-) In the end,
the keys are supposed to mirror how data is stored in DB tables. If you
just want to store data somehow, there are much simpler ways. I thought
SIO uses SMW's container feature to avoid direct reference to DB
internals now?
My two technical questions remained open, and I have a third one:
(1) Would it even be possible to deploy many MW extensions that are in
different top-level directories in one git repo without pulling
subdirectories from the repo individually? If not, then the deployment
of git-code on sites
On 19/07/12 11:22, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi,
I am sceptical about this. I do not see the advantage of having SMW
extensions maintained outside the normal MW git repo. It creates yet
another system to be aware of. On top of it, by installing from this
repo the user would not be done, i.e.
On 18/07/12 11:56, CNIT wrote:
On 18.07.2012 13:07, Daniel Schuba wrote:
I'm wondering why the most important thing about this is not
mentioned. Which versions of PHP are used/installed on major linux
distributions. For example I have an ubuntu server with 10.04 LTS with
PHP 5.3. So when PHP
Hi,
as I understand Jeroen, this is mainly a proposal about code
maintenance, not about deployment. Somebody who pulls the whole repo
will have the code for all extensions that are in there, but that does
not mean that they are all enabled (or even mutually compatible).
It seems to me that a
On 16/07/12 18:02, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
I discussed using PHP namespaces a while back with Markus and Nischay
and have now written up my thoughts on the roadmap:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Roadmap#Introduce_PHP_namespaces
This will be a big improvement. We can also rename files
On 17/07/12 09:48, Benedikt Kämpgen wrote:
Hello,
Validator uses get_called_class in
Validator/includes/definitions/ParamDefinition.php on line 872.
Apparently, this method is only available from PHP 5.3.0 onwards.
Does that mean that Validator and SMW do require PHP = 5.3.0 from now on?
On 05/07/12 14:03, Nischay Nahata wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:50 PM, James HK jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com
mailto:jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I assume that Semantic MediaWiki 1.8 will include the new storerewrite
and while I'm looking forward to this
can follow my progress line by line? that
way you could probably help me better if other issues arise. So
far i have written code for SemanticMediaWiki and SemanticMaps.
Cheers
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic
On 25/05/12 10:42, Александр Морозов wrote:
I have a problem with URLs as properties. In update SPRAQL query i
have URLs like: http:**somehost.com/... http://somehost.com/.
There are FOUR slashes in URL in update request to endpoint. But in
Special:Export to RDF everything is ok.
On 23/05/12 21:11, Leonard Wallentin wrote:
is there a way to hide hidden categories from showing up in query
results that I have missed?
If you mean excluding the pages for a certain category from your query
result, then no, you cannot do this. I think.
Sorry, that was unclear.
On 20/05/12 22:45, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
This mail is mainly directed at Markus, but sending it to the list for
transparency sake.
I started working on making the link generation (ie for the further
results links) in SMWResultPrinter more generic so we can get rid of
the buggy and
, at 10:04, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi James, hi all,
the relationship and synergies of SMW and Wikidata are of course quite
important to us, so I am taking the time to write a slightly longer
email that I also send to the user list.
At the moment, Wikidata is still under development, so
Dear SMW users developers,
many of you are already aware of the Wikidata project [1] -- a major
effort to establish a platform for editing and sharing data among all
Wikipedia communities. The project will start next Monday, 2 April 2012.
A few moments ago, the official press release on
On 22/03/12 01:28, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
...
* Migrate SMW to the new WMF git repo. We could also migrate somewhere
else (ie GitHub) or even stick with SVN (and reclaim our SourceForge
repo? :D). I'd go with the first option though, since this has benefits
of visibility and
On 13/02/12 15:57, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
it doesn't seem important enough, in my opinion, to get a slot in the
Google Summer of Code
I tend to agree here. There are things in greater demand that would be
useful to more people that could be done. However, I think this idea
should go
Just a short reply: It would be good to have some such formalism, but
designing a good language is not easy and would introduce another
programming-like formalism into MW. I think one should seriously
consider the upcoming LUA support to solve this problem [1]. It would be
much preferable to
Dear Alex,
thanks for reminding me. I have now fixed the problem (SVN revision
111233). Updating the single file ./includes/export/SMW_Exporter.php
should suffice. I have not found a bug report about this; if there is
one then it would be good if you could point me to it s I can close it.
The
Thanks, fixed in r111237. The main file that needs update is
./includes/storage/SMW_SparqlStoreQueryEngine.php
Cheers,
Markus
On 02/02/12 13:58, Alex M. Hendler (public) wrote:
Hello,
On SMW 1.7.0 (using Semantic Bundle from 2012-01-09), MW 1.18.1, and
4store 1.1.4, if I execute the
On 14/01/12 14:33, James Hong Kong wrote:
Hi,
Hi James,
Starting with SMW 1.7 and MW 1.18, we began to convert our old legacy
document system into a SMW-MW based system which right now left us
with more than 700.00 triplets stored in SMW but at the same time
decreased our response time on
This might be interesting for extension developers on this list as well.
Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Mediawiki-l] MediaWiki Workshop: Preparing extensions for
MediaWiki 1.19 - 1/13/2012 on #wikimedia-dev
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 20:53:17 -0500
From: Gregory Varnum
1 - 100 of 577 matches
Mail list logo
