Do I have your attention yet? :) I just installed ApacheDS, which is
the new Apache LDAP java server, in about 50 seconds as a plugin INSIDE
my Geronimo server using the deployer tool and a .car file I downloaded
from http://geronimoplugins.com. The mind boggling implications of this
new
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/avalon/cornerstone/services/connection/AbstractHandlerFactory
Key: JAMES-773
URL:
On 2/1/07, David Woldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I have your attention yet? :)
you have mine
i'm not an expert but i'll try an initial response
I just installed ApacheDS, which is
the new Apache LDAP java server, in about 50 seconds as a plugin INSIDE
my Geronimo server using the
robert burrell donkin wrote:
but just running probably isn't enough. probably want to be able to
integrate other services and this is where things become a little more
difficult. ATM the database implementation uses torque. you'd probably
want to hack a alternative implementation using JPA POJOs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469516
]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-773:
---
Well, we of course run james without this exception or we wouldn't
Hi Robert,
snip
and I want a lot more. I want mail and news servers in Geronimo too,
and I want mailets that can call local EJB's that I can redeploy at will
(or perhaps even make local EJB's that are themselves mailets.)
mailets that are EJB sounds better than calling EJBs from mailets
On 2/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
but just running probably isn't enough. probably want to be able to
integrate other services and this is where things become a little more
difficult. ATM the database implementation uses torque. you'd probably
On 2/1/07, David Woldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
snip
and I want a lot more. I want mail and news servers in Geronimo too,
and I want mailets that can call local EJB's that I can redeploy at will
(or perhaps even make local EJB's that are themselves mailets.)
mailets that
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
but just running probably isn't enough. probably want to be able to
integrate other services and this is where things become a little more
difficult. ATM the database implementation
Hey Stefano,
Maybe this helps:
http://wiki.apache.org/james/Embedded
Maybe the spring integration stuff make it even simpler by skipping
phoenix at all.
I don't remember specific showstoppers, but feel free to submit them
if you try and find something.
I often hear Spring discussed in
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i found time over the last week or two to take a look at MINA and
understand better the words it uses. i now suspect that we've been
working towards similar architectures from different perspectives.
[...]
opinions?
The diagram is almost standard MINA setup. +1 for
On 2/1/07, David Woldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Stefano,
Maybe this helps:
http://wiki.apache.org/james/Embedded
Maybe the spring integration stuff make it even simpler by skipping
phoenix at all.
I don't remember specific showstoppers, but feel free to submit them
if you try and
On 2/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i found time over the last week or two to take a look at MINA and
understand better the words it uses. i now suspect that we've been
working towards similar architectures from different perspectives.
[...]
robert burrell donkin wrote:
It seems you/we would like to replace the protocol handling with MINA,
to change the spooling architecture, to rewrite the storage, to remove
avalon or at least phoenix and so on.
Maybe starting a whole new effort would be much better than keep trying
moving
On 2/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm not sure that is necessary: it should be possible (given
modularisation) to work within the existing frameworks.
- robert
If this is not necessary I'm even happier: we'll have a better overview
once the new component is ready, so go
On 1/31/07, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the resources that i think are of interest are emails, meta-data about
emails, collections of emails and meta-data about collections of
emails. these concepts already have natural correspondents in HTTP and
WebDAV
U/F it looks like
You know who is doing this really successfully and even made it a key
upselling point?
I imagine there are even performance numbers for it. I know I'm
speaking heresy...
had a talk with some of the DAV folks last year. AIUI the right way to
do it would be to standardize a small amount of
Serge Knystautas schrieb:
On 2/1/07, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm not sure that is necessary: it should be possible (given
modularisation) to work within the existing frameworks.
- robert
If this is not necessary I'm even happier: we'll have a better overview
once the
18 matches
Mail list logo
