Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.8.0

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 19 Mag 2023, 04:27 Rene Cordier ha scritto: > +1, > > Rene. > > On 19/05/2023 09:23, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.0 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > You can find: > > > > - The maven release staged in

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.7.4

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 24 Mar 2023, 03:56 Rene Cordier ha scritto: > +1 > > Rene. > > On 24/03/2023 00:21, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.4 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > You can find: > > > > - The maven release staged in

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.7.3

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 11:21 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.3 release of the Apache James > server. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1072: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James MIME4J 0.8.9

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:19 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.9 release of the Apache James > MIME4J library. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1070: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James JSPF 1.0.3

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:24 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.3 release of the Apache James > JSPF library. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1071: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James Mime4J 0.8.8

+1 Vincenzo On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:28 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.8 release of the Apache James > MIME4J library. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1067: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James JSPF 1.0.2

+1 Vincenzo On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:13 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote: > I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.2 release of the Apache James > JSPF library. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1069: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James JSieve 0.8

+1 vincenzo On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 5:48 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote: > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8 release of the Apache James > JSieve library. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1068: >

Re: Vote: Apache James JDKIM 0.3 [Call 2]

+1 Vincenzo Il Lun 10 Ott 2022, 03:14 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James > JDKIM library. > > You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the > artifact #1065: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.7.2

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 7 Ott 2022, 09:26 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.2 release of the Apache James > server. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1066: >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James JDKIM 0.3

+1 Vincenzo Il Dom 2 Ott 2022, 11:06 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > +1 > > On 02/10/2022 16:06, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James > > JDKIM library. > > > > You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.7.1

+1 Vincenzo Il Lun 29 Ago 2022, 04:30 Rene Cordier ha scritto: > +1, > Rene. > > On 26/08/2022 18:12, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > > |Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.1 release of the Apache > > James server. You can find: - The maven release staged in > > repository.apache.org as

Re: Call for vote: Apache James MIME4J 0.8.7

+1 Vincenzo ___ Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini Il Ven 1 Apr 2022, 12:35 Rene Cordier ha scritto: > +1, > Rene. > > On 01/04/2022 12:04, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.7 release of > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache James release 3.7.0

+1 Vincenzo ___ Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini Il Mer 2 Mar 2022, 04:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.0 release of the Apache James > server. > > You can find: > > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache James release 3.6.2

+1 Vincenzo Il Gio 27 Gen 2022, 08:08 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hello, > > Sorry for the bad formatting. > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.2 release of the Apache James > server. > > You can find: > > - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact > #1061:

Re: [IMPORTANT] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.1 (3rd edition...)

+1 Vincenzo On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:44 AM Antoine Duprat wrote: > +1 > > Antoine > > Le jeu. 16 déc. 2021 à 08:27, btell...@apache.org a > écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > This time, as discussed on the

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.1

+1 Vincenzo  ___ Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI) Cel. +39-3939837493 fax: +39-02-25514302 https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari http

Re: Call for vote: Apache JAMES MIME4J

+1 Vincenzo Il Ven 17 Set 2021, 13:01 btell...@apache.org ha scritto: > +1 > > On 17/09/2021 17:59, btell...@apache.org wrote: > > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.6 release of > > the Apache MIME4J library. You can find: - The maven release staged in > >

Re: [Vote] Call for vote: Apache Mime4J 0.8.4

+1 Vincenzo On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:09 AM Tellier Benoit wrote: > Hi, > > Following a user request (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-297 > ), > > I would like to propose a vote for 0.8.4 release of the MIME4J library. > > You can find the maven release staged in

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

+1 Vincenzo On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:28 AM Rémi Kowalski < remi.florian.kowal...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit > : > > > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > After an initial mistake (sorry),

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.5.0

+1 Vincenzo  Il Gio 16 Lug 2020, 08:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote 3.5.0 release of the Apache James > server. > > I fixes Matthieu remarks since last proposal. > > You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion > of that release on

Re: [Vote] migration to java 11

+1  ___ Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI) Cel. +39-3939837493 fax: +39-02-25514302 https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari http

Re: [Call for vote] Post 3.3.0 Components deprecation

+1 for all components Vincenzo Il Gio 28 Mar 2019, 09:27 Benoit Tellier ha scritto: > Hi, > > In order to improve overall James development experience, I propose to > do a bit of post 3.3.0 cleanup. > > The proposal is to mark the given components as deprecated now, then, if > no

Re: Call for vote: MIME4J 0.8.3

+1 Vincenzo Il giorno gio 14 mar 2019 alle ore 10:54 Benoit Tellier < btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the 0.8.3 release of the Apache MIME4J library. > > You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion > of that release, as well as

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.3.0

+1 Vincenzo Il giorno lun 18 mar 2019 alle ore 10:01 Antoine Duprat ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the 3.3.0 release of the Apache James server. > > You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion > of that release, as well as communication on this GitHub pull >

Re: Call for vote: mime4J version 0.8.1

+1 Thanks, Vincenzo Il giorno dom 11 giu 2017 alle ore 07:35 Manuel Carrasco Moñino < man...@apache.org> ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, 6:06 AM aduprat wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Le 09/06/2017 à 05:09, Benoit Tellier a écrit : > > > Hello, > > > > >

Re: Release james-server into 3.0.0-RC1

+1 Vincenzo Il giorno gio 11 mag 2017 alle ore 04:10 Benoit Tellier < btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > Le 11/05/2017 à 01:25, aduprat a écrit : > > Hello every one, > > > > I'm very happy to announce the vote for the upcoming 3.0.0-RC1 version > > of our beloved james server. > > > >

Re: Call for vote: new website

+1 Great job, Vincenzo Il Ven 21 Apr 2017, 13:07 Tellier Benoit ha scritto: > Hello, > > After a one week feedback period, as discussed in a previous email, I > would like to trigger a one week voting period for release of the new > version of the website. > > The changes

Re: Release james-server into 3.0.0-beta5

+1 Thanks, Vincenzo Il Gio 3 Nov 2016, 09:25 Manuel Carrasco Moñino ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks > - Manolo > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, aduprat wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Antoine > > > > > > > > Hello every one, > >> > >> I'm very happy to announce

Re: Fwd: Release org.apache.james:apache-mime4j-project into 0.8.0

+1 Thanks, Vincenzo Il Sab 15 Ott 2016, 06:34 Manuel Carrasco Moñino ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks > - Manolo > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016, 15:13 Matthieu Baechler wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > > > Matthieu Baechler > > > > On 10/12/2016 01:15 PM, Tellier

Re: James logo – the Vote is Open

for participating. > > > > Regards, > > > > Laura > > > > > > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Server 2.3.2.1

e, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > -- *Ing. Vincenzo G

Re: Proposal about James modules merge

thing to have in mind is that we need to we need to take care of the site publishing also. But it's doable. Regards, -- *Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini* Chairman CTO - GoCloud Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI) Sede op. ed amm.: Via Stefanardo da Vimercate 28, 20128 Milano (MI) Cel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Project 1.8.2

[X] +1 Please release Ciao, Vincenzo -- Il presente messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono confidenziali in ragione della loro natura professionale e, in ogni caso, non accessibili al pubblico. Nel caso in cui il presente messaggio sia ricevuto da soggetto diverso dal suo diretto destinatario, si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James App 3.0-beta4 (3rd try)

[X] +1 Please release Vincenzo 2012/3/22 Eric Charles eric.char...@u-mangate.com (resending, the mail didn't appear in the mailing lists) Hi Jamers, Please review and cast your VOTE for James server application 3.0-beta4 release. NOTICE and template configuration files have been fixed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Server and App 3.0-beta4

[X] +0 No time to review Sorry guys, but currently I'm unable to follow it. I hope in the future to be more helpful. Ciao, Vincenzo 2012/3/2 Eric Charles e...@apache.org Hi there, We are ready to vote for James server application 3.0-beta4 based on the latest and greatest Protocols 1.6.2,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.1

[X] +0 No time to review Vincenzo 2012/1/19 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com Hi there, after a defect in starttls was found in Apache James Protocols 1.6.0 its time to release a bugfix release for it asap. So please cast your vote... Artifacts to review:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Mime4j 0.7.2

[ x] +0 No time to review Vincenzo 2012/1/8 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com Hi there, its time again for a new release of Apache James Mime4j 0.7.2. Changelog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Skin 1.7

[X] +1 Please release I'm too busy around to review, but I agree with Stefano. Vincenzo 2011/10/18 Stefano Bagnara apa...@bago.org 2011/10/18 Felix Knecht fe...@otego.com: Hi A list of changes/fixes: - Logos for James modules added (when existing) - Fancybox utility for image zooms

R: [VOTE] Release Apache James 3.0-beta3

[X] +1 Release Apache James 3.0-beta3 Great job Robert! Vincenzo Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:33:32 To: James Developers Listserver-dev@james.apache.org Reply-To:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

[x] +1 Go ahead Vincenzo 2011/6/12 Eric Charles e...@apache.org [x] +1 Go ahead - Eric On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote: Hi there, its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and need the new mailbox api changes. This release does not need any api changes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2

[X] +1 Yes please release Vincenzo 2011/5/21 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com Hi there, here is the VOTE for version 0.2 of Apache James IMAP. This will be used for the upcomming beta release of Apache James Server. So please review and cast our vote:

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

[X] + 0 No time to review Sorry, I'm not able now to examine the whole thing ... If my vote becomes crucial, let me know. Ciao, Vincenzo 2011/5/10 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com Hi there, this is the VOTE for release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1. Both releases are

Re: [VOTE] Move to java6 for james-server, imap, mailbox

[X] +1 Yes please go ahead Ciao, Vincenzo 2011/4/23 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com Hi there, this is a VOTE to move the minimum java version to java6 for james-server, imap, mailbox. So please VOTE... [ ] +1 Yes please go ahead [ ] +0 No real preference [ ] - 1 No... We

Re: [VOTE] Release Mime4J 0.6.1

[X] +1 Yes please release Ciao, Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.3

[X] +1 Yes please release Ciao, Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.2

[X] +1 Yes, please release Ciao, Vincenzo 2010/11/27 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org Hi there, its time again to cut a release for protocols. This release will be included in the upcomming james server release. So please review and cut your VOTE:

Re: [VOTE AGAIN] James Server 3.0-M2

[X] +1 Yes please release 2010/11/10 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org Hi all, after fixing a major bug with leaking files on windows I want to start the VOTE for M2 again. Here are the artifacts for review: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-056/ So please

Re: [VOTE] Release JAMES Server 3.0-M2

[X] +1 Yes please release Ciao, Vincenzo 2010/11/6 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org Hi all, its time to start a VOTE for the second milestone of the upcomming major version of JAMES Server (3.0). I know its not long since the last milestone but we fixed a bunch of bugs, and you know..

Re: [VOTE] Release IMAP 0.2-M1

[X] +1 Looks good, please release Ciao, Vincenzo Il giorno 15 ottobre 2010 21.22.44 UTC+2, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.orgha scritto: Hi there, we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut the first milestone of JAMES server. For doing so we need a new release of IMAP. I

R: [VOTE] Release of protocols-1.2-M1

[X] +1 Looks good, please release Ciao, Vincenzo --Messaggio originale-- Da: Norman A:James Developers List Rispondi a:James Developers List Oggetto: [VOTE] Release of protocols-1.2-M1 Inviato: 15 Ott 2010 07:16 Hi there, we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut the

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.1

[X] +1 Please release the artifacts Vincenzo P.S. Thanks for your continuous commitment. 2010/7/4 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org Hi all, to be able to release James Server 3.0-M1 we need to cut a release of the protocols subproject, to remove SNAPSHOT dependencies. The protocols release

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-mailet-base 1.1

[X] +0 No time for review Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Release jsieve 0.4 (AGAIN)

[X] +1 Please release the artifacts Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-mailet 2.5

[X] +0 No time for review Sorry for not being helpful. Ciao, Vincenzo

Re: [IMAP] [VOTE] James IMAP 0.1-M1 Release

Great! I'm unable to review, so [X] +0 No time for review But otherwise I would +1, as it's a long awaited thing! Vincenzo On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I think its time to cut the first milestone of IMAP. This Milestone will prolly be

Re: [VOTE] Release James-Project 1.5

[+0] No time to review

Re: [VOTE] Pure Spring deployment ready to merge

Great Norman! [X] +0 I trust you enough but had not the energie to review the changes Sorry, but I won't be able to test it. But it would be a very important thing to give back fuel to James. Ciao, Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Add Hupa as subproject to JAMES

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, just for to be safe I would start a VOTE about adding Hupa[1] as subproject to JAMES. So here we go.. [X] +1 Yeah I would like to Hupa included it Vincenzo Thx, Norman [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release James 2.3.2

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: i've uploaded an FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/james/ please review, test and then vote. all are encouraged to express their opinions but only PMC votes are binding on apache. note that i

Re: 2.3.2 Release ...?

I agree with Steve. Vincenzo On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Steve Brewin sbre...@synsys.com wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldon...@gmail.com] wrote on: 12 June 2009 14:06 On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Stefano Bagnaraapa...@bago.org wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache JSieve 0.3

I didn't get too much acquainted with JSieve, unfortunately. [ ] +1 Release Apache JSieve 0.3 [X] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not release Apache JSieve 0.3 Cheers, Vincenzo On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: i think we're still need another

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mailet Base 1.0

[x] +1Release apache-mailet-base 1.0 Bye, Vincenzo On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: after three release candidates, i think it's time to call the work. the release can be found at

Re: [VOTE] Create mime4j-dev mailing list

X] +/-0, I don't care Same as Stefano :) Ciao, Vincenzo On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stefano Bagnara apa...@bago.org wrote: Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: Hi, Development of mime4j has considerably gained speed, with added committers and successful releases. Mime4j discussions

Re: [VOTE] Release Mailet API 2.4

[X] +1 Release Mailet API 2.4 Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] James Mime4j 0.4 release (take 2)

+1 Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product

[x] +1 Create mailet-base Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)

[x] +0 Cool to see the release Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Mailet First Steps

[x] +1 Create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject -

Re: [VOTE] Mailets - Mailet subproject

[x] +1 Move Mailets to Mailet subproject Vincenzo

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting commit in trunk

[X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James codebase Vincenzo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Move spring-deployment module to TRUNK

+1 Vincenzo Bernd Fondermann wrote: Hi, As proposed in a previous mail, we should make the spring-deployment part of trunk. As a consequence, we would be able to release a Spring-container-based Server runtime besides our regular Avalon-based. Please cast your vote to execute svn cp

Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?

[X] +1 Great! Vincenzo robert burrell donkin wrote: the code in trunk has a ton of new features (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser) i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to cut a milestone from trunk and christen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jar names should contain apache (was: Re: [mime4j] release plan for 0.3)

+1 Vincenzo Danny Angus wrote: On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd prefer Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute products on their own. +1. d. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Jukka Zitting Committer Karma

+1 Vincenzo Noel J. Bergman wrote: Jukka Zitting, JackRabbit Committer PMC Chair, has volunteered to help work on a Proof of Concept related to the use of JCR as our unified data store. The proof of concept will start by focusing on the modelling of the data in JCR, and will build from the

Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.1 (final)

+1 Vincenzo Norman Maurer wrote: Hi all, its me again :-P If we want to get JAMES 2.3.1 out of the door before ApacheCon EU we have to VOTE now. So here it is... You can grab the builds from: http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads Please test and review ;-) This VOTE will be

Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.1RC1

+1 Vincenzo Norman Maurer wrote: Hi guys, after noone replied to my question about 2.3.1rc1 I dediced to moved forward to start a vote (to much time allready lost). So please download,test and vote ;-) A list of changes can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch

Norman Maurer wrote: Hi all, i start this vote because i want to get an idea what other developers think about this. Here are the possible solutions: 1) Commit fixes and new minor features to 2.3 branch: +1. My point is: we need fixes plus minor features applied to code branch that we

Re: AW: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch

that are not well-tested, and that must be released with the critical bugfix that has to be fixed and released. I hope I was able to bring my point across... Kind regards Juergen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21

Re: AW: AW: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch

Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: Hi Vincenzo, see inline... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 16:04 An: James Developers List Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch *We* comitters should be wise

Re: Quota matcher

Norman Maurer wrote: Hi guys, as you (hopefully) all know the current Quota code is very ineffectiv and can cause many problems when using JDBC based mailrepository. See: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-717 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-718 For me there are 2

[jira] Reopened: (JAMES-712) Improbe Logging of delivery exception

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-712?page=all ] Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini reopened JAMES-712: - The fix applied to RemoteDelivery does not compile under JDK 1.4 because uses replace(CharSequence target, CharSequence

Re: [DISCUSSION] Preparing next-major

It seems to be a reasonable set of choices. I will try to have james-616 in time for the next checkpoint. Vincenzo Stefano Bagnara wrote: Hi all, Norman and I made today an IM session to review current JIRA issue. We: 1. moved to Trunk every issue having an assignee and no fix version 2.

[jira] Updated: (JAMES-616) Add chi-square-based spam filter approach to BayesianAnalyzer.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-616?page=all ] Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini updated JAMES-616: Fix Version/s: Next Major Gary Robinson gave a first answer with some clarifications/links and promised to come back, but didn't show

Re: AW: Permanent errors from transient DNS issues?

Hi Jürgen and Norman, I agree with you *if* I can be sure that at least one of *my* nameservers (the ones queried by my James server) is able to reach the net and doesn't resolve the target domain (no target nameservers found), and anwers NXDOMAIN. But is it possible to figure it out? And

Re: AW: Permanent errors from transient DNS issues?

Hi Norman, IMHO the point is: are we sure of that? Will dnsjava return Lookup.TRY_AGAIN even if all *my nameservers* are reachable but they are isolated from the rest of the world? And do you agree that the above is the right discriminator? Ciao, Vincenzo Norman Maurer wrote: Hi

Re: AW: AW: Permanent errors from transient DNS issues?

No such user Can we really be sure that there really is no such user, or that the administrator may have mis-configured his Mailserver. ;) Kind regards Juergen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 27. November 2006 15:29

Re: Permanent errors from transient DNS issues?

Adding my 2c to Norman's example: Because of the scenario he described, I changed my config.xml long time ago to one day instead of 5 days of retry before giving up. I was planning to code in RemoteDelivery (and never did it) a kind of warning bounce feature to trigger after a few hours,

Re: AW: Next-Major and trunk: AGAIN (Was: [jira] Updated: (JAMES-663))

+1 Vincenzo Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: Hi guys, sorry if my last 2 E-Mails were shot before reading all Mails, but I am on a GPRS Link at the moment, and using it is really a PITA. Anyways, just to sum it up. It seems we all have the same view now, and can agree with consent. Everyone is fine

Re: AW: Next-Major and trunk: AGAIN (Was: [jira] Updated: (JAMES-663))

Hi everybody, Juergen said it exactly: what Stefano and Norman are doing is just proactively judging what they think could and should be fixed/developed for next-major, and documenting it through jira labels, without any change to our subversion repository. All the committers are free to have

Re: Next-Major and trunk: AGAIN (Was: [jira] Updated: (JAMES-663))

So what you mean is that the right thing to do is, if someone plans to have something fixed/working for next-major is to *add* the next-major fix version *without removing* the trunk label, right? Sounds correct. Vincenzo Noel J. Bergman wrote: Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: All he is doing is

Re: isLogEnabled() and StringBuffer

Norman Maurer wrote: Joachim Draeger schrieb: ... BTW: I have often seen NPE *bugs* in debug messages, that appeared magically when the costumer has turned on *de*bugging. :-) This could avoided by putting a try/catch block around... Joachim Im against this.. Even if the

Re: isLogEnabled() and StringBuffer

:-) Vincenzo Joachim Draeger wrote: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote: BTW: I have often seen NPE *bugs* in debug messages, that appeared magically when the costumer has turned on *de*bugging. :-) This could avoided by putting a try/catch block around... Im against this.. Even

James development using NetBeans

Some notes on how to develop, run, debug and profile James using NetBeans can now be found in http://wiki.apache.org/james/NetBeansNotes Vincenzo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Release 2.3.0 (PLEASE REVIEW)

Tanti auguri a te ... Vincenzo Noel J. Bergman wrote: PS: today is my birthday Congratulations. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] James Server future releases/road maps

Next minor +0 (time is passing and I think that it is becoming unfeasible to get something in a short term, specially without the involvement of Norman and Stefano) Next major +1 Vincenzo Stefano Bagnara wrote: More than 1 month ago we discussed a lot about next releases road maps. We

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

Danny, you expressed *perfectly* my thinkings. Vincenzo Danny Angus wrote: On 10/19/06, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we just discuss the underlying issue? Noel knows this software inside and out and made the majority of the commits for a couple of years there. Now he

Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)

+1 for releasing 2.3.0rc5 as 2.3.0 final. Vincenzo Norman Maurer wrote: Hi all, i think we are now ready to VOTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I build,sign and upload the release.. You can grab it from: http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/ Plz review The other question

Re: [VOTE] James 2.3.0rc5

For me it's up and running in production, but I'm not using the last fixes: +1 Vincenzo Norman Maurer wrote: Hi all, i just backport all needed patches, build, sign and upload the release for review. You can get it from: http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/ Please cast your

Re: [POLL] 2.3.0 release plans

Now we have a choice for the next step: 1) start a vote to release 2.3.0rc4 as 2.3.0 final -0 2) include 1 or more of the 3 patches and start a vote for 2.3.0 final -1 3) include 1 or more of the 3 patches and start a vote for 2.3.0rc5 +1 And start a vote for 2.3.0 final shortly

  1   2   3   >