+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 19 Mag 2023, 04:27 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
>
> Rene.
>
> On 19/05/2023 09:23, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.0 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> >
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 24 Mar 2023, 03:56 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Rene.
>
> On 24/03/2023 00:21, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.4 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> >
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 11:21 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.3 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1072:
>
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:19 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.9 release of the Apache James
> MIME4J library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the a
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:24 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.3 release of the Apache James
> JSPF library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the a
+1
Vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:28 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.8 release of the Apache James
> MIME4J library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the a
+1
Vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:13 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.2 release of the Apache James
> JSPF library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1069:
> https
+1
vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 5:48 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8 release of the Apache James
> JSieve library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1068:
> https
+1
Vincenzo
Il Lun 10 Ott 2022, 03:14 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James
> JDKIM library.
>
> You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the
> artifact #1065:
> https
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 7 Ott 2022, 09:26 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.2 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1066:
>
+1
Vincenzo
Il Dom 2 Ott 2022, 11:06 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> +1
>
> On 02/10/2022 16:06, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James
> > JDKIM library.
> >
> > You can find the
+1
Vincenzo
Il Lun 29 Ago 2022, 04:30 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
> Rene.
>
> On 26/08/2022 18:12, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > |Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.1 release of the Apache
> > James server. You can find: - The maven release staged in
&
+1
Vincenzo
___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Il Ven 1 Apr 2022, 12:35 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
> Rene.
>
> On 01/04/2022 12:04, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.7 release of
> >
+1
Vincenzo
___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Il Mer 2 Mar 2022, 04:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.0 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> -
+1
Vincenzo
Il Gio 27 Gen 2022, 08:08 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the bad formatting.
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.2 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apac
+1
Vincenzo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:44 AM Antoine Duprat wrote:
> +1
>
> Antoine
>
> Le jeu. 16 déc. 2021 à 08:27, btell...@apache.org a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache James
>
+1
Vincenzo

___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l
Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI)
Cel. +39-3939837493
fax: +39-02-25514302
https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari
http
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 17 Set 2021, 13:01 btell...@apache.org ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> On 17/09/2021 17:59, btell...@apache.org wrote:
> > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.6 release of
> > the Apache MIME4J library. You can find: - The
+1
Vincenzo
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:09 AM Tellier Benoit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following a user request (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-297
> ),
>
> I would like to propose a vote for 0.8.4 release of the MIME4J library.
>
> You can find
+1
Vincenzo
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:28 AM Rémi Kowalski <
remi.florian.kowal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit
> :
>
> > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> &
+1
Vincenzo

Il Gio 16 Lug 2020, 08:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote 3.5.0 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> I fixes Matthieu remarks since last proposal.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the oc
+1

___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l
Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI)
Cel. +39-3939837493
fax: +39-02-25514302
https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari
http
+1 for all components
Vincenzo
Il Gio 28 Mar 2019, 09:27 Benoit Tellier ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> In order to improve overall James development experience, I propose to
> do a bit of post 3.3.0 cleanup.
>
> The proposal is to mark the given components
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno gio 14 mar 2019 alle ore 10:54 Benoit Tellier <
btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 0.8.3 release of the Apache MIME4J library.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
>
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno lun 18 mar 2019 alle ore 10:01 Antoine Duprat
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 3.3.0 release of the Apache James server.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release, as well as communication o
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il giorno dom 11 giu 2017 alle ore 07:35 Manuel Carrasco Moñino <
man...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, 6:06 AM aduprat <adup...@linagora.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Le 09
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno gio 11 mag 2017 alle ore 04:10 Benoit Tellier <
btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Le 11/05/2017 à 01:25, aduprat a écrit :
> > Hello every one,
> >
> > I'm very happy to announce the vote for the upcoming 3.0.0-RC1 versio
+1
Great job,
Vincenzo
Il Ven 21 Apr 2017, 13:07 Tellier Benoit <btell...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> After a one week feedback period, as discussed in a previous email, I
> would like to trigger a one week voting period for release of the new
> version of the web
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il Gio 3 Nov 2016, 09:25 Manuel Carrasco Moñino <man...@apache.org> ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> - Manolo
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, aduprat <adup...@linagora.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> >
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il Sab 15 Ott 2016, 06:34 Manuel Carrasco Moñino <man...@apache.org> ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> - Manolo
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016, 15:13 Matthieu Baechler <matth...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> >
>
VOTE FOR LOGO NUMBER: 10
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il Lun 26 Set 2016, 17:33 Matthieu Baechler <matth...@apache.org> ha
scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> Thank you Laura for this call for vote.
>
> Here is my vote :
>
> * VOTE FOR LOGO NUMBER: 10
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> M
[X] +1 Please release
Thanks to everybody for addressing this problem.
Vincenzo
Il giorno Lun 31 Ago 2015 06:01 Felix Knecht <fel...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> [X] +1 Please release
>
>
> Am 29.08.2015 um 09:38 schrieb Eric Charles:
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
Hi all,
sorry for not having been active at all in the last period.
Anyway, I agree with Ioan that using GIT is *much* more productive than
using SVN, so I cast here my +1.
Regards,
Vincenzo
Il giorno lun 24 ago 2015 alle ore 21:51 Ioan Eugen Stan
stan.ieu...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hi,
Yes
[X] +1 Please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
--
Il presente messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono confidenziali in ragione
della loro natura professionale e, in ogni caso, non accessibili al
pubblico. Nel caso in cui il presente messaggio sia ricevuto da soggetto
diverso dal suo diretto destinatario, si
[X] +1 Please release
Vincenzo
2012/3/22 Eric Charles eric.char...@u-mangate.com
(resending, the mail didn't appear in the mailing lists)
Hi Jamers,
Please review and cast your VOTE for James server application 3.0-beta4
release. NOTICE and template configuration files have been fixed
[X] +0 No time to review
Sorry guys, but currently I'm unable to follow it. I hope in the future to
be more helpful.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2012/3/2 Eric Charles e...@apache.org
Hi there,
We are ready to vote for James server application 3.0-beta4 based on the
latest and greatest Protocols 1.6.2
[X] +0 No time to review
Vincenzo
2012/1/19 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Hi there,
after a defect in starttls was found in Apache James Protocols 1.6.0
its time to release a bugfix release for it asap.
So please cast your vote...
Artifacts to review:
https
[ x] +0 No time to review
Vincenzo
2012/1/8 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Hi there,
its time again for a new release of Apache James Mime4j 0.7.2.
Changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truejqlQuery=project+%3D+MIME4J+AND+fixVersion+%3D
[X] +1 Please release
I'm too busy around to review, but I agree with Stefano.
Vincenzo
2011/10/18 Stefano Bagnara apa...@bago.org
2011/10/18 Felix Knecht fe...@otego.com:
Hi
A list of changes/fixes:
- Logos for James modules added (when existing)
- Fancybox utility for image zooms
[X] +1 Release Apache James 3.0-beta3
Great job Robert!
Vincenzo
Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:33:32
To: James Developers Listserver-dev@james.apache.org
Reply
[x] +1 Go ahead
Vincenzo
2011/6/12 Eric Charles e...@apache.org
[x] +1 Go ahead
- Eric
On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi there,
its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
need the new mailbox api changes.
This release does not need any api changes
[X] +1 Yes please release
Vincenzo
2011/5/21 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Hi there,
here is the VOTE for version 0.2 of Apache James IMAP. This will be
used for the upcomming beta release of Apache James Server.
So please review and cast our vote:
https
[X] + 0 No time to review
Sorry, I'm not able now to examine the whole thing ...
If my vote becomes crucial, let me know.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2011/5/10 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Hi there,
this is the VOTE for release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1.
Both releases
[X] +1 Yes please go ahead
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2011/4/23 Norman Maurer norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Hi there,
this is a VOTE to move the minimum java version to java6 for
james-server, imap, mailbox.
So please VOTE...
[ ] +1 Yes please go ahead
[ ] +0 No real preference
[ ] - 1 No... We
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
[X] +1 Yes, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2010/11/27 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org
Hi there,
its time again to cut a release for protocols. This release will be
included in the upcomming james server release. So please review and
cut your VOTE:
https://repository.apache.org/content
[X] +1 Yes please release
2010/11/10 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org
Hi all,
after fixing a major bug with leaking files on windows I want to start
the VOTE for M2 again.
Here are the artifacts for review:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-056/
So please
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2010/11/6 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org
Hi all,
its time to start a VOTE for the second milestone of the
upcomming major version of JAMES Server (3.0). I know its not long
since the last milestone
but we fixed a bunch of bugs, and you know
[X] +1 Looks good, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Il giorno 15 ottobre 2010 21.22.44 UTC+2, Norman Maurer
nor...@apache.orgha scritto:
Hi there,
we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut the first
milestone of JAMES server. For doing so we need a new release of IMAP.
I
[X] +1 Looks good, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
--Messaggio originale--
Da: Norman
A:James Developers List
Rispondi a:James Developers List
Oggetto: [VOTE] Release of protocols-1.2-M1
Inviato: 15 Ott 2010 07:16
Hi there,
we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut
+1
Vincenzo
Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Danny Angus da...@apache.org
Sender: danny.an...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:05:47
To: James Developers Listserver-dev@james.apache.org
Reply-To: James Developers List server-dev@james.apache.org
[X] +1 Please release the artifacts
Vincenzo
P.S. Thanks for your continuous commitment.
2010/7/4 Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org
Hi all,
to be able to release James Server 3.0-M1 we need to cut a release of
the protocols subproject, to remove SNAPSHOT dependencies. The protocols
release
[X] +1 Please release the artifacts
I'm travelling so I can't review, but I'm sure Stefano did a great job.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org
Sender: norman.mau...@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19
I too do trust you, Norman :)
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Danny Angus da...@apache.org
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:06:42
To: James Developers Listserver-dev@james.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-mailet-base 1.1
+1
[X] +0 No time for review
Vincenzo
[X] +1 Please release the artifacts
Vincenzo
[X] +0 No time for review
Sorry for not being helpful.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Great!
I'm unable to review, so
[X] +0 No time for review
But otherwise I would +1, as it's a long awaited thing!
Vincenzo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I think its time to cut the first milestone of IMAP.
This Milestone will prolly
[+0] No time to review
Great Norman!
[X] +0 I trust you enough but had not the energie to review the changes
Sorry, but I won't be able to test it. But it would be a very important
thing to give back fuel to James.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
just for to be safe I would start a VOTE about adding Hupa[1] as
subproject to JAMES. So here we go..
[X] +1 Yeah I would like to Hupa included it
Vincenzo
Thx,
Norman
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
i've uploaded an FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/james/
please review, test and then vote. all are encouraged to express their
opinions but only PMC votes are binding on apache.
note that i
I agree with Steve.
Vincenzo
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Steve Brewin sbre...@synsys.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldon...@gmail.com] wrote on: 12
June 2009 14:06
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Stefano
Bagnaraapa...@bago.org wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha
I didn't get too much acquainted with JSieve, unfortunately.
[ ] +1 Release Apache JSieve 0.3
[X] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not release Apache JSieve 0.3
Cheers,
Vincenzo
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
i think we're still need another
[x] +1Release apache-mailet-base 1.0
Bye,
Vincenzo
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
after three release candidates, i think it's time to call the work.
the release can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/apache-mailet-base
X] +/-0, I don't care
Same as Stefano :)
Ciao,
Vincenzo
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stefano Bagnara apa...@bago.org wrote:
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
Hi,
Development of mime4j has considerably gained speed, with added
committers and successful releases.
Mime4j discussions
[X] +1 Release Mailet API 2.4
Vincenzo
+1
Vincenzo
[x] +1 Create mailet-base
Vincenzo
[x] +0 Cool to see the release
Vincenzo
-
[x] +1 Create product crypto-mailets in mailet subproject
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not create product cyrpto-mailets in mailet subproject
---
Vincenzo
[x] +1 Move Mailets to Mailet subproject
Vincenzo
[X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James codebase
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Vincenzo
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi,
As proposed in a previous mail, we should make the spring-deployment
part of trunk.
As a consequence, we would be able to release a Spring-container-based
Server runtime besides our regular Avalon-based.
Please cast your vote to execute
svn cp
[X] +1 Great!
Vincenzo
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the code in trunk has a ton of new features
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser)
i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to
cut a milestone from trunk and christen
+1
Vincenzo
Danny Angus wrote:
On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.
+1.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
+1
Vincenzo
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jukka Zitting, JackRabbit Committer PMC Chair, has volunteered to help
work on a Proof of Concept related to the use of JCR as our unified data
store. The proof of concept will start by focusing on the modelling of the
data in JCR, and will build from
+1
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
its me again :-P
If we want to get JAMES 2.3.1 out of the door before ApacheCon EU we
have to VOTE now. So here it is...
You can grab the builds from:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads
Please test and review ;-)
This VOTE
+1
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
after noone replied to my question about 2.3.1rc1 I dediced to moved
forward to start a vote (to much time allready lost). So please
download,test and vote ;-)
A list of changes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
;-) .
2) Commit only bugfixes to 2.3 branch:
-0
So please cast your votes and tell me what you prefer.
bye
Norman
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jürgen, read inline...
Vincenzo
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Vincenzo,
reading your mail, I was wondering what the difference between a minor and a
major feature might be?
IMHO, in this context minor should mean simple and safe, or optional
(like a new mailet for example, whose usage
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Vincenzo,
see inline...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 16:04
An: James Developers List
Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch
*We* comitters should be wise
Norman
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-712?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini reopened JAMES-712:
-
The fix applied to RemoteDelivery does not compile under JDK 1.4 because uses
replace(CharSequence target, CharSequence
It seems to be a reasonable set of choices.
I will try to have james-616 in time for the next checkpoint.
Vincenzo
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Hi all,
Norman and I made today an IM session to review current JIRA issue. We:
1. moved to Trunk every issue having an assignee and no fix version
2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-616?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini updated JAMES-616:
Fix Version/s: Next Major
Gary Robinson gave a first answer with some clarifications/links and promised
to come back, but didn't show
week because there is a typo in the domain part of an address.
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
that was exactly what i did. But then they all start complaining. Thats
why i changed it to be configurable.
bye
Norman
Hi All,
seriously, I disagree with how you expect DNS to work
Hi Norman,
IMHO the point is: are we sure of that? Will dnsjava return
Lookup.TRY_AGAIN even if all *my nameservers* are reachable but they are
isolated from the rest of the world?
And do you agree that the above is the right discriminator?
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi Vincenzo
want instead to try to fix the things, so it's my problem.
I sure may be wrong, but as I said before I'm making a difference here
between *my* nameservers and the *target domain* nameservers.
Vincenzo
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Vincenzo,
seriously, if another mailserver is delivering a 552
it is *much* more probable that
the domain is non-existent for real and not that there are network
problems. What do you think?
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
Norman,
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
-1
The handling of this condition as temporary
+1
Vincenzo
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry if my last 2 E-Mails were shot before reading all Mails, but I am on a
GPRS Link at the moment, and using it is really a PITA.
Anyways, just to sum it up. It seems we all have the same view now, and can
agree with consent. Everyone is fine
think that we all can and should stay calm, peaceful, optimistic and polite.
Vincenzo
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Bernd,
From my viewpoint, all he is trying to do is to define a rough road map for
himself with the tools he has at hand.
And if trunk == next-major, where is the difference? Why
So what you mean is that the right thing to do is, if someone plans to
have something fixed/working for next-major is to *add* the next-major
fix version *without removing* the trunk label, right? Sounds correct.
Vincenzo
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
All he is doing
sense instead to have a global try/catch block somewhere to
avoid having a server crash, and this does exist in James (see
http://wiki.apache.org/james/HandlingExceptions).
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
:-)
Vincenzo
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
BTW: I have often seen NPE *bugs* in debug messages, that appeared
magically when the costumer has turned on *de*bugging. :-) This could
avoided by putting a try/catch block around...
Im against this.. Even
Some notes on how to develop, run, debug and profile James using
NetBeans can now be found in
http://wiki.apache.org/james/NetBeansNotes
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Tanti auguri a te ...
Vincenzo
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
PS: today is my birthday
Congratulations.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Next minor +0 (time is passing and I think that it is becoming
unfeasible to get something in a short term, specially without the
involvement of Norman and Stefano)
Next major +1
Vincenzo
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
More than 1 month ago we discussed a lot about next releases road
maps. We
Danny,
you expressed *perfectly* my thinkings.
Vincenzo
Danny Angus wrote:
On 10/19/06, Serge Knystautas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we just discuss the underlying issue? Noel knows this software
inside and out and made the majority of the commits for a couple of
years there. Now he
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
