Hi,
It is important to download content to the XO so that children can
access them offline. This is not a technical problem. In the Karma
Learning System, this is done using cgi-scripts which access the school
server using sftp.
Tony
On 10/07/2013 12:00 PM,
Hi fellow server-hackers!
We will be having our fifth IRC scrum meeting tomorrow 8th October on 1600
UTC / 1200 EDT at the #schoolserver channel (irc.freenode.net). The meeting
will be logged by a supybot instance.
Please start filling in your points to discuss in the rolling agenda
document
Hi,
I got this email for an error log of a xsce-0.4, 64 bit installation. Any
ideas?
(I've asked the person concerned to join server-devel, so he can ask
questions directly in the future).
Best,
Anish
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Lillis johnmichael...@gmail.com
Date: Fri,
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:45 -0700, Anish Mangal wrote:
Hi,
I got this email for an error log of a xsce-0.4, 64 bit installation.
Any ideas?
(I've asked the person concerned to join server-devel, so he can ask
questions directly in the future).
Best,
Anish
-- Forwarded
Since 0.4 was just released, it is a good moment to talk about future
development efforts. I spent this weekend thinking about the progress
we have made through this release, not just in terms of development
effort, but growth as a community. What follows in this email below is
a set of ideas and
First, I'm not sure what Anna is describing is push based in a pure
technical sense. The client receiving files must either be always
online or poll some central server to see if there is anything to be
downloaded. To the end user, it's push based, but technically, it's
still polling by the client
Don't number it 0.4.5, instead number it 0.5, and push any plans you
had for 0.5 out to 0.6. The sooner you get to 1.0 the more acceptable
the version number will become. 0.4, based on the descriptions I see,
is already 1.0 fodder.
Ansible sounds fine, but you haven't said what it is for; no
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:51 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Don't number it 0.4.5, instead number it 0.5, and push any plans you
had for 0.5 out to 0.6. The sooner you get to 1.0 the more acceptable
the version number will become. 0.4, based on the descriptions I see,
is already
