Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Hey Jeffrey, hey Garry, as I look through the source from 3.4 it seems this is already fixed, at least it was in master-branch as of Feb 28th 08:05 UTC (a quick check: 3.2.x doesn't contain the fix, but the 3.3.x does). Once I encountered a similar issue as I once didn't set database type

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
Thanks guys. You're right, 3.3 does have the fix, and it creates the tables, but throws this exception: WrapperSimpleApp: Encountered an error running main: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'pop3server': Invocation of init method failed;

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
Could james be trying to start the pop server more than once? INFO | jvm 1| 2019/03/26 08:51:03 | INFO 08:51:03,433 | org.apache.james.protocols.lib.netty.AbstractConfigurableAsyncServer | LMTP Service disabled by configuration INFO | jvm 1| 2019/03/26 08:51:03 | INFO

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, first: the stack is incomplete - there should be an IOException as lowest exception. second: this stack doesn't fit to the config you send earlier. So somethings blocking TCP/110. Just do a complete system reboot (if possible) cause it seems somethings "hung up". Matt Am 26.03.2019 um

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
Thanks, I'll try the reboot. -Original Message- From: cryptearth [mailto:cryptea...@cryptearth.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:03 AM To: server-user@james.apache.org Subject: Re: sqlResources.xml Well, first: the stack is incomplete - there should be an IOException as lowest

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
The error is WrapperSimpleApp: Encountered an error running main: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'pop3server': Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelException: Failed to bind to: /0.0.0.0:110

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, I don't use pop3 - but looks like an config issue. Please post your conf/pop3server.xml Matt Am 26.03.2019 um 11:57 schrieb Marans.Jeffrey: Thanks guys. You're right, 3.3 does have the fix, and it creates the tables, but throws this exception: WrapperSimpleApp: Encountered an error

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, the issue is, that you have anything else already running on TCP/110 - like another POP3 server. Check your system what other POP3 server is running ... Matt Am 26.03.2019 um 13:38 schrieb Marans.Jeffrey: The error is WrapperSimpleApp: Encountered an error running main:

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
Thanks, I check port 110 and found nothing there. I also telneted to localhost 110 and got a connection refused, which means nothing's listening. -Original Message- From: cryptearth [mailto:cryptea...@cryptearth.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:53 AM To: server-user@james.apache.org

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
The system on which I'm developing was running dovecot. Even though I turned off and chkconfig'd off dovecot, the portreserve file contained the entries imap, imaps, pop3, pop3s. Those entries didn't specify TCP or UDP, so the portreserve program read /etc/services which contains pop3

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
The reason james would not run on port 110 is that the portreserve program is on UDP 110. I don't know why I didn't see that earlier, but Matt and Gary, thanks for your time, patience, and in-depth knowledge. Regards, Jeffrey Marans -Original Message- From: cryptearth

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, if something runs on UDP/110 - you should still be able to bind to TCP/110 - as TCP and UDP are independent, unless the "portreserve" you speak about also binds/blocks TCP/110. Unless you have a multi-homed system or any other specific reason, 0.0.0.0:110 should be used (maybe also

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, wikipedia lists the UDP ports as "protocol assigned, but not used". Maybe you would had found it when you just had used "lsof -i" - without grep. I guess this "port reserve stuff" is something starting way early in the system startup to block other programms to use needed ports - and

Re: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread cryptearth
Well, the "error" you got is "cannot bind - address already in use" - this usually means, that there is already something bound to the port you try to use. Altough the config somehow doesn't match to the latest log (config says 0.0.0.0:110 but log shows hostname), the one you shown only

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
I've rebooted the system twice and am still getting the same exception. Nothing's listening on 110 as evidenced by "telnet nsep1u9254 110 Trying 10.33.117.54... telnet: connect to address 10.33.117.54: Connection refused" This also returns nothing: lsof -i -P -n | grep LISTEN Is the popserver

RE: sqlResources.xml

2019-03-26 Thread Marans . Jeffrey
I am starting james as root, and I've tried using 0.0.0.0:110, the IPaddress:110, the servername:110, and the fqdn:110. All 3 give essentially the same "cannot bind" result. The only file in conf that refers to port 110 is pop3server.xml and it only has one uncommented bind line. Out of