Hi Steve,
I appreciate the backlog of mail you are working from, as you note in your
mail, but
I always think it useful to have carefully read a document before performing a
critique. I'm sure
you would agree with that sentiment. I was therefore quite surprised to find
you had said the
On 5/20/14, 10:38 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
we got past
folk looking up 'per se' in their dictionaries.
Well not exactly, since that was never the initial problem. I just decided
not to make an issue out of it any further since I seemed to be the only
one expressing the concern.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:18 PM, George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com wrote:
On 5/20/14, 10:38 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
we got past
folk looking up 'per se' in their dictionaries.
Well not exactly, since that was never the initial problem. I just decided
not to make an issue
ok, so we're just holding on roque then?
no. i know how to deal with that one. but i do not want to make
multiple updates. so waiting for wglc to finish (actually, i think
it timed out already), so i can issue one hack.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
ok, so we're just holding on roque then?
no. i know how to deal with that one. but i do not want to make
multiple updates. so waiting for wglc to finish (actually, i think
it timed out already), so i can issue one hack.
yes,
