Chis,
The document is now RFC 6912 published as BCP.
Regards,
Roque
On 14/11/14 21:00, Christopher Morrow christopher.mor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also there was a question (from hannes?) about algorithm change
processes and timelines.. that's covered in:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
rogag...@cisco.com wrote:
Chis,
The document is now RFC 6912 published as BCP.
great! (I should have looked further along the line in the tools page I bet)
Regards,
Roque
On 14/11/14 21:00, Christopher Morrow
Just to be precise, it's RFC 6916 (BCP 182).
RFC 6912 is about Principles for Unicode Code Point Inclusion in
Labels in the DNS - differnet topic ;).
Cheers
matthias
--
Matthias Waehlisch
. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
..
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Per discussion during IDR/SIDR meeting Friday, there may need to be
some text in the security considerations around the attack vector of
sending many updates with long (but valid) AS_Paths
could you please describe how an
On 11/17/14, 12:13 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
could you please describe how an attacker can send many long bgpsec
paths? how are these long paths signed?
Though I'm guessing it might be possible to try it as a replay attack
(grab a string of signed ASNs from the path of one or more
