Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > Pinging this thread to catch anyone who didn't reply but had thoughts > I'd like to close this out tomorrow before 5pm EST (10pm UTC). > Damn my lack of date specificity!! To be clear, I'd like to make the

Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

Christopher Morrow writes: > Pinging this thread to catch anyone who didn't reply but had thoughts > I'd like to close this out tomorrow before 5pm EST (10pm UTC). I've been considering the concept behind this document and whether the concept should be carried forward

Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

> Every public/private working group that I have been part of that > discusses potential incremental roll out of RPKI based origin > validation gets hung up on FUD about the brittleness of the system. universally, the brittleness that seems to concern operators is the hierarchy and the 'dutch

Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

I would like to see this work continue. Every public/private working group that I have been part of that discusses potential incremental roll out of RPKI based origin validation gets hung up on FUD about the brittleness of the system. While validation reconsidered does not solve all potential