[sidr] Terry Manderson's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-05: (with COMMENT)

Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01

Hi, I support working group adoption, Oliver On 5/3/16, 5:55 AM, "sidr on behalf of Tim Bruijnzeels" wrote: >Hi, > >I believe this is useful work and support adoption. Happy to contribute to the >discussion where I can. > >Tim > > > > >>

Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status

+1 to Roque's point. Definitely standards track. Thanks, Sharon On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) < rogag...@cisco.com> wrote: > +1 with Standard Track. > > The question could have been relevant six years ago and we may not have > debated it that much then. Today, we

Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status

​ howdy, it's past 4/29/2016 || 29/4/2016 || Mar 29 2016... and from the discussion on-list and mostly in the room in EZE, it appears: "Please maintain Proposed Standard as the track for SIDR work." i think this closes out the discussion. thanks for deliberating and discussing this topic!

Re: [sidr] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-05: (with DISCUSS)

Hiya, On 03/05/16 15:02, George, Wes wrote: > Completing approval on this one while it's in queue > also seems a better use of IESG cycles It's a minor point but evaluating this one really calls for having reviewed bgpsec as well so I think doing this one 1st will be a slightly less good use of

Re: [sidr] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-05: (with DISCUSS)

On 5/3/16, 6:30 AM, "Stephen Farrell" wrote: > >Hi Wes, > >This is only a timing problem if bgpsec doesn't change in some >incompatible manner. If such a change happens then this is more >than a timing issue. >What'd be bad about just holding this in the WG until

Re: [sidr] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-05: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Wes, (FWIW, I agree with Kathleen's DISCUSS on this but one question below before I post my own ballot...) On 02/05/16 20:31, George, Wes wrote: > > On 5/2/16, 1:04 PM, "Kathleen Moriarty" > wrote: > > >> >>

Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01

Hi, I believe this is useful work and support adoption. Happy to contribute to the discussion where I can. Tim > On 02 May 2016, at 15:32, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > > Hello all, > > LACNIC has worked on three projects involving RPKI-enabling IXPs [0]. We >