spare > seems spare...
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:19 AM, RFC Errata System <
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6487,
> "A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates".
>
> --
> You may review the report
> What about certificate that contain IP address set only OR AS number set
> only (not both)?
s/and/or/ seems formally correct, albeit a bit nitty
>>> Original Text
>>> -
>>> encompass
>>> Given two IP address and AS number sets, X and Y, X
>>> "encompasses" Y
May but not must.
What about certificate that contain IP address set only OR AS number set
only (not both)?
2017-11-28 13:01 GMT+03:00 Geoff Huston :
> Reject - in the context of resource certificates the resources may contain
> both IP addresses _AND_ AS numbers.
>
>
>
> > On 28
Reject - in the context of resource certificates the resources may contain
both IP addresses _AND_ AS numbers.
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 8:04 pm, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6487,
> "A Profile for X.509 PKIX