Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5190)

2017-11-28 Thread Christopher Morrow
spare > seems spare... On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:19 AM, RFC Errata System < rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6487, > "A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates". > > -- > You may review the report

Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5187)

2017-11-28 Thread Randy Bush
> What about certificate that contain IP address set only OR AS number set > only (not both)? s/and/or/ seems formally correct, albeit a bit nitty >>> Original Text >>> - >>> encompass >>> Given two IP address and AS number sets, X and Y, X >>> "encompasses" Y

Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5187)

2017-11-28 Thread Nikolai Malykh
May but not must. What about certificate that contain IP address set only OR AS number set only (not both)? 2017-11-28 13:01 GMT+03:00 Geoff Huston : > Reject - in the context of resource certificates the resources may contain > both IP addresses _AND_ AS numbers. > > > > > On 28

Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5187)

2017-11-28 Thread Geoff Huston
Reject - in the context of resource certificates the resources may contain both IP addresses _AND_ AS numbers. > On 28 Nov 2017, at 8:04 pm, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6487, > "A Profile for X.509 PKIX