Re: [sidr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-02

2018-12-26 Thread Christopher Morrow
BCP seems like a fine answer here, I'm not remembering why we would have swapped to ST from BCP. On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:12 AM Warren Kumari wrote: > [ + Sandy, Alvaro ] > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 9:51 AM Scott Bradner wrote: > >> that use of a MUST is commendable but its not exactly an

Re: [sidr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-02

2018-12-26 Thread Warren Kumari
[ + Sandy, Alvaro ] On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 9:51 AM Scott Bradner wrote: > that use of a MUST is commendable but its not exactly an interoperability > issue > > to me “must” works in this case (and the other cases in this document) > > but, that said, 2119 has been misused for kinda a long time