Overall this looks good. I found one minor issue and a bunch of nits,
and I have some questions:
= minor =
4.6.7. Notification of Certificate Issuance by the CA to Other Entities:
There is no section 4.4.3.
= questions =
1.5.1. Organization administering the document: Should the address
I guess I should have also said that I support moving this draft down
the path towards publication.
spt
On 3/4/13 6:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
I'll go along with that.
I'm not seeing any major structural alterations to the draft (at this stage) by
doing that.
Cheers,
Terry
On
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Sean Turner turn...@ieca.com wrote:
I guess I should have also said that I support moving this draft down the
path towards publication.
I got that :) I am/was/am waiting for the next rev to pop into the tracker.
spt
On 3/4/13 6:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
Great... so assuming the authors deal with this set of comments we'll
ask them to spin a new version and submit that for WGLC when it
arrives?
Does that seem like a good path for those still listening?
-chris
co-chair-1-of-3
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Sean Turner turn...@ieca.com wrote:
Below are some comments on the draft. I also submitted my nits to the
editors.
0) Based on the assumption that draft-newton-sidr-policy-qualifiers will
be adopted because that's what the RIRs want should s1.2 or 1.5 also
include some information about where it can be found? This information
Hi Steve,
I appreciate the very rapid revisions.
I am perfectly happy with all of the proposed revisions below.
I think the amended document is ready to progress.
Cheers
Terry
On 28/02/2013, at 4:26 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
Terry,
Thanks for the feedback. Below are responses to your
WG folks,
As the subject states, let's please start a WGLC poll for the document:
draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01
with the abstract:
This document contains a template to be used for creating a
Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for an
