I understand why ARIN wants this -- I'm sure our legal folks would want
something similar if we were in their predicament (i.e., one more place
for indemnification against failures, compromises, actions of
[grand]parents, etc..), reading the current RPA makes this clear:
S.7 You shall
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Danny McPherson da...@tcb.net wrote:
On 2013-03-07 13:18, Christopher Morrow wrote:
please click on this link to accept my TOS:
https://badplace.com/malwareCPS.cps.doc.exe.pdf.gif
That could be included anywhere - and if it's in a resource certificate then
On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:54 PM, da...@tcb.net wrote:
I'm not sure I understand how this opens the user to malware attack, could
you please explain? I understand the DoS vector, this certainly exists for
all of RPKI, but I don't
On Mar 7, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Eric Osterweil eosterw...@verisign.com
wrote:
On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:54 PM, da...@tcb.net wrote:
I'm not sure I
Sean,
I forgot to reply to your first comment. See what happens when you label
it 0?
0) Based on the assumption that draft-newton-sidr-policy-qualifiers will
be adopted because that's what the RIRs want should s1.2 or 1.5 also
include some information about where it can be found? This
0) Based on the assumption that draft-newton-sidr-policy-qualifiers will
be adopted
i simply do not understand the utility of that draft
either no one ever sees the urls, or they are a malware attack vector.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
Typically the rationale for the URI is so that the a CA can satisfy it's
legal counsel that
potential relying parties have been informed, via the URI, of the
presence of a CPS, and
that RPs who care can download and read it before maknig use of the
certs issued by the CA.
Its a CYA mechanism.
Typically the rationale for the URI is so that the a CA can satisfy
it's legal counsel that potential relying parties have been informed,
via the URI, of the presence of a CPS, and that RPs who care can
download and read it before maknig use of the certs issued by the CA.
Its a CYA
On Mar 5, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Typically the rationale for the URI is so that the a CA can satisfy
it's legal counsel that potential relying parties have been informed,
via the URI, of the presence of a CPS, and that RPs who care can
download and read it before
On 06/03/2013, at 8:44 AM, Stephen Kent k...@bbn.com wrote:
Typically the rationale for the URI is so that the a CA can satisfy it's
legal counsel that
potential relying parties have been informed, via the URI, of the presence of
a CPS, and
that RPs who care can download and read it
I was reminded that not all objects in the RPKI repository are
CMS objects, e.g., certs and CRLs.
These are binary objects that do not start with an OID.
Nonetheless, since we have adopted rsync as the access protocol
for the RPKI repository, and since it deals with files and filenames,
using
At Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:10:04 -0400, Steve Kent wrote:
Geoff Houston saw both the original and revised slides and pointed
out that the revisions was not correct (which may have been what Rob
alluded to in a question to me late in the session.) The problem
Geoff noted is that FOO will fail
12 matches
Mail list logo
