-Original Message-
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Randy Bush
so i reviewed the minutes from last month, looking for what i had to hack in
the docs i edit.
surely there was more. help!!!
[WEG] I have some notes implying I owe you text, but
Send Randy text about *why* you should drop invalid
i actually understand this. it's the jgs paris aha. thanks!
if you have a roa
10.0.0.0/16-24 42
and you get announcements
10.0.0.0/16 42
10.0.666.0/24 666
if you do not drop the invalid 10.0.666.0/24, then longest match will
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : BGPsec Operational Considerations
Author(s) : Randy Bush
Filename:
Brian Dickson brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Brian,
I believe I understand your system as functionally creating an
BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute with a algorithm/signature set that is
based off of adding random numbers to the signature field(s) instead of
adding cryptographically
there have been no comments on list to confed and aliasing. may we
call them done?
Can you expound more what you mean by aliasing above? Do you mean
local-as, etc.
yep
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
On May 23, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
there have been no comments on list to confed and aliasing. may we
call them done?
Can you expound more what you mean by aliasing above? Do you mean
local-as, etc.
yep
That's strange. Why doesn't the following comment to the list back in
Can you expound more what you mean by aliasing above? Do you mean
local-as, etc.
yep
That's strange. Why doesn't the following comment to the list back in
March of this year count as no comments on list to ... aliasing?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04093.html
it
On May 23, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Can you expound more what you mean by aliasing above? Do you mean
local-as, etc.
yep
That's strange. Why doesn't the following comment to the list back in
March of this year count as no comments on list to ... aliasing?
Can you expound more what you mean by aliasing above? Do you
mean local-as, etc.
yep
That's strange. Why doesn't the following comment to the list back
in March of this year count as no comments on list to ...
aliasing?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04093.html
it
Rob Austein s...@hactrn.net writes:
For those who didn't get to see the end of the RPKI Over BitTorrent
presentation in today's SIDR meeting, the full slide deck is available
at
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-9.pdf
and should be relatively self-explanatory.
10 matches
Mail list logo