well, actually, the discussion in april was walking around many of
the implications thereof. it is hard to discuss do we keep/replace
AS[4]_PATH as it is abstract and draws deep philosophical discourse
with no hard handles on technical decision points.
I think you should remove the [4]
i agree. but every time i say AS_PATH someone whacks me with AS4_PATH.
maybe this is why i like the NO_EXPLICIT_PATH :)
well, you are normally consistent at asking people to read the documents :-).
r.
randy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:09 PM
To: Murphy, Sandra
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
In the interim in San Diego, there were requests (from
heasley h...@shrubbery.net writes:
This sure smells to me like a solution in need of multicast (or, more
accurately, deployed multicast) with a fall back to something like
bittorrent for bootstrapping or when you've missed session data and
can't recover. Multicast as a data stream would be
Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:36:51AM -0700, Wes Hardaker:
I didn't say only :-) . In fact, I pointed at bittorrent as a backup. I
simply said it would be more efficient when sending out *new* changes.
understood; i'm registering/re-enforcing that if that is developed it must
not be the only mathod.
The 6/6/2012 (6/6/2012 for the EU folks or Jun 6 2012) meeting agenda
looks like:
* aspath not present - implications?
- scudder's notes at previous meeting
perhaps not all the bugs worked out/considerations made
(not just tools, re-figuring the aspath on entrance/exit,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:19 AM, George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com wrote:
However, in order to gain any benefit from the location, we probably need to
publicize the interim on the NANOG list, though the window for doing it
before travel plans are made is probably closing/closed.
Wasn't
heasley h...@shrubbery.net writes:
Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:36:51AM -0700, Wes Hardaker:
I didn't say only :-) . In fact, I pointed at bittorrent as a backup. I
simply said it would be more efficient when sending out *new* changes.
understood; i'm registering/re-enforcing that if that is
An astute reader notes that the original message:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04563.html
(additionally, until a moment ago the wiki doc for the meeting had
this text copied/pasted into it...)
Had the original timing data (full-day), the space and other
constraints
Wes,
On May 23, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Bittorrent works well for sharing the load, but either requires a lot of
bittorrent start files (whatever they're called), which then becomes
hard to syncronize; or a small number of bittorrent files (one per
aggregation point) that
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:13 PM, John G. Scudder j...@juniper.net wrote:
Wes,
On May 23, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Bittorrent works well for sharing the load, but either requires a lot of
bittorrent start files (whatever they're called), which then becomes
hard to syncronize; or
* aspath not present - implications?
- scudder's notes at previous meeting
perhaps not all the bugs worked out/considerations made
(not just tools, re-figuring the aspath on entrance/exit,
are there other places where aspath is used/required?
confeds is one
The authors have stated that they believe that draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-05
Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures is ready for a working group last
call.
The draft can be accessed at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-05 and
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
* aspath not present - implications?
- scudder's notes at previous meeting
perhaps not all the bugs worked out/considerations made
(not just tools, re-figuring the aspath on entrance/exit,
are there
a quick read only. and sorry to wait for wglc, but that's life. at
least i did not wait for ietf lc :)
--
what is RPSL? it is not defined, nor is there a cite.
--
2.1. General Attributes, Meta Information
in general, the format/syntax of the attribute part of many fields might
be
These are my comments on the draft draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-05
In the Introduction (Para 3) it says:
A maintainer of such signed database objects MUST possess a relevant
resource certificate which shows him/her as the legitimate holder of an
Internet number resource
I'm afraid I'm confused on
16 matches
Mail list logo
