Done by anyone that wants to do it and rigorous left loosely defined.
Any clinic can do a clinical trial.
Triple Blind has distinct benchmarks and set requirements involving 3
separate groups of people. [at least 500 carefully screened people per
group ?]
...costs several millions of dollars
@eskimo.com silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSClinical Trials
David,
Why do you care about clinical trials,
I think its important to know the difference between a clinical trial and a
lab test. If you don't, you will just look like a fool and get shot down
pretty quickly as soon
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@silverpuppy.com
Date: 12 August 2014 3:20:11 AM
Clinical trials are not considered proof of anything by the FDA
Triple Blind Studies are.
Several Clinical Trials have been performed with CS and all were
dismissed by the FDA as they formed The Final Word
On 11/08/2014, at 10:16 PM, silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com wrote:
From: Victor Cozzetto victor.cozze...@gmail.com
Date: 11 August 2014 9:18:46 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSClinical Trials
David,
Why do you care about clinical trials,
I think its
From: M.G. Devour mdev...@gmail.com
Date: 11 August 2014 9:46:20 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSClinical Trials
What is probably right, though, is to say that clinical trials have
not
and will not happen any time soon.
Mike D.
Its not hard to imagine that, under normal
The fact of the matter is that clinical trials have landed us many dud drugs
that killed a lot of PPL, because clinical trials can be misleading, easy to
manipulate, easy to create the outcome you want by manipulating the data and
the trial proceedings.
Science is so easy to corrupt that drug
One thing that is really bad is that drug companies are allowed to use
anything they want as the placebo, then they are allowed to call it a
sugar pill. Generally the only time they really use a sugar pill for a
placebo is when testing drugs for diabetes. What is generally done is
to use a
There is lots of tricks. Like if the scientists know that certain populations
are more likely to be negatively impacted by the drug, in other words if older
PPL or younger PPL cannot handle the side effects then they are excluded by the
trials. They can exclude who they wish by certain tricks
Clinical trials are not considered proof of anything by the FDA
Triple Blind Studies are.
Several Clinical Trials have been performed with CS and all were
dismissed by the FDA as they formed The Final Word published in 1999
Ode
On 8/11/2014 12:28 PM, Alan Faulkner wrote:
The fact of the
Well said. My posts agree with you 100% Alan, so I think your question was
intended for David or Mike?
Victor
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Alan Faulkner ala...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact of the matter is that clinical trials have landed us many dud
drugs that killed a lot of PPL, because
Sorry Victor, when I get on a rant I usually make at least one blooper.
Alan
On 2014-08-11, at 15:12 PM, Victor Cozzetto wrote:
Well said. My posts agree with you 100% Alan, so I think your question was
intended for David or Mike?
Victor
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Alan Faulkner
From: Phil Morrison philmorrison...@gmail.com
Date: 11 August 2014 1:33:55 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CS Clinical Trials
To: alchemysa
There have been tons of clinical trials proving CS nanoparticle
efficacy
against all pathogens, without exception, including Ebola.
David,
Why do you care about clinical trials, the FDA, etc.? They do NOT establish
fact, as you imply. We know for a fact that many clinical trials are
falsified, and many, if not most drugs on the market are ineffective or do
more damage than harm.
As a society we are in trouble exactly because
Victor asks David:
Why do you care about clinical trials, the FDA, etc.?
David replies:
We do ourselves a disservice by claiming there is proof where
there is none. Its a stick that our opponents will continually
beat us with. Far better for us to
Thank you Mike! If you were to substitute vitamin C for CS in your
message, it would be equally true and profound.
Best regards,
Doug
-Original Message-
From: M.G. Devour [mailto:mdev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 6:16 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSClinical
Well said Mike. I agree with you and David 99%, but I still have a point of
contention about the clinical trials.
My point is about keeping the people empowered.
FDA approval and 'official' clinical trials should not be held as being
more weighted than the 'other' evidence that you listed.
16 matches
Mail list logo
