Subject:
Re: CS>Blue man
From:
"Tony Moody" <a...@new.co.za>
Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:22:55 +0200
To:
silver-list@eskimo.com
To:
silver-list@eskimo.com
Hi Dan,
Theoretically it is possible to get much more that Faraday output. Microscopically the
electrolysis mines holes in the electrode. Particles which are undermined and fall off into the
liquid add to the mix but are unaccounted for in the equation.
OK,
Tony
I'm sure this is correct. I've mentioned it here in the past. Close
examination of a well used electrode with a magnifying glass will reveal
a surface resembling a cratered moonscape - just perfect for creating
particles. The cathode (the electrode that receives a rough plating of
silver) is especially conducive to creating tiny silver particles that
are shed when the electrodes are swapped.
The idea that all the particles in home-made CS are various silver
compounds, rather than pure silver particles, is promoted by the likes
of Mesosilver and repeated ad-nauseam. Mesosilver (silver-colloids.com)
have analysed many batches of CS and have confirmed the generally
accepted figure of about 15% particles in a good quality CS batch. But
mesosilver can't or won't reveal what those particles are actually made
of. I suspect theres more pure silver in those particles than they would
like to admit.
David
