Title: Re: [Sipp-users] sipp defunct processes
Marc,
can you confirm that this is fixed for you too?
http://sipp.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sipp.2006-10-23.tar.gz
Thanks,
Olivier.
Olivier,
As I won't have time until somewhere in November to try this out, you'll have to wait a bit
Hi
All,
Just wanted to know
whether SIPp has support for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY messages ?
Thanks,
Devdutt.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
Peter,
I think I got this right, but still get the same message. I included
the script and command.
Let me know if you see anything wrong with this.
Michael
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ?
scenario name=Basic UAS responder
!-- By adding rrs=true (Record Route Sets), the route sets
--
Title: Re: [Sipp-users] sipp defunct processes
Marc,
The fix works by spawning a child then the
child immediately spawning another child (ch#2) that ch#2 will do the actual
work. Parent waits for ch#1 which returns immediately so no blocking occurs
there. After ch#2s parent exits its
Lars Roland wrote:
I finally got some time to work on this. Patch is attached.
I don't have any IPv6 pcap files, to test with. also I did not test on
any other platform than Cygwin.
The following still applies:
On my system I've copied the WinPcap developer package to
Ive got a hacked version of 1.1 (2006-10-2) running on native Vista with
SUA utilities, running as a mixed-mode Windows EXE and POSIX executable.
It uses the Windows pcap libraries and a POSIX build of SSL.
I had to hack the pcap-send to not use raw mode as Vista doesn't send
UDP headers even
Title: Message
I have a scenario
(see below) for invite. The scenario works when I send the call to an
actual SIP station. Does anyone have a reply scenario? I have a SIP
Server that will take care of the server replies. I need a 180 Ringing and
200 OK from a client as a response to the
Olivier,
I've included a TCP modification in the latest patch set that I just sent
to the list.
It corrects three deficiencies:
1. If EAGAIN is returned, then return -1 from the send function so that the
call knows that this message was not sent successfully and will try again.
2. Allow the
Hello Charles,thanks for this great set of contributions. It is great to see that people and companies are investing their time and money in enhancing what exists instead of re-inventing the wheel when this is not needed (sometimes it is!). Newton once wrote a letter to Robert Hooke where he had
Hello Michael,nice to know.Could you send that on the mailing list (if it is not too big)?Olivier.On 10/24/06, Michael Slavitch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ive got a hacked version of
1.1 (2006-10-2) running on native Vista withSUA utilities, running as a mixed-mode Windows EXE and POSIX
10 matches
Mail list logo