[Sipp-users] Need help in this UAS call flow (200OK for PRACK followed by 200OK)

2007-04-24 Thread Girish Gangaiah
Hi, I am testing the following scenario using Sipp: sipp UAC--- SIP SBC SIP UAS SIP SBC does interworking between SIP-SIP. 1. UAC will send Invite 2. SIP SBC will forward this Invite to UAS 3. UAS will send 183 with SDP. 4. SIP SBC will send PRACK to 183. 5. UAS will send

Re: [Sipp-users] Changes for using SIPp in an implementaion of ETSI TISPAN IMS Benchmark

2007-04-24 Thread Verbeiren, David
Hi Charles, I for one am certainly interested in these changes. There are a lot of them that are generally useful (e.g., your performance improvements), and also applicable to any interested in user-model based-benchmarking. Glad to hear you're sharing that point of view. The biggest

Re: [Sipp-users] Need help in this UAS call flow (200OK for PRACKfollowed by 200OK)

2007-04-24 Thread Peter Higginson
You cannot send with retrans unless you next wait on receive. So you need to move the retrans to the 200OK for INVITE. Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Girish Gangaiah Sent: 24 April 2007 18:19 To: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Sipp-users] Changes for using SIPp in an implementation of ETSI TISPAN IMS Benchmark

2007-04-24 Thread Charles P Wright
Hi David, Verbeiren, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2007 04:35:10 PM: The biggest logistical problem I see with this patchset is that there has probably been quite a bit of divergence of your tree and the SIPp tree in the meantime. For example, your network changes are going to