Nachricht-
Von: Charles P Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 17:23
Wolfgang,
I tried the scenario with the SVN trunk and did not get an error.
Charles
Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/07/2008 07:07 AM
Hi all,
recently I am asking for a error segmentation fault due to the external
commands, i.e.
action
exec command=echo pass verdict.log/
/action
The problem is still relevant but all scenarios worked properly until sipp2.0.
There are any hints?
Thanks,Wolfgang.
Deutsche Telekom AG
Hi,
a scenario containing the following element:
action
exec command=echo pass verdict.log/
/action
breaks whith the error segmentation fault (Speicherzugriffsfehler) and the
exitcode 139.
sipp -v - SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06.
This scenario worked
Hi,
what is going wrong?
I am now trying SIPp version 3.1 and my user-scenario breaks whith the
following info:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080bc320 ***
Abgebrochen
$? - (exitcode=134), but all messages were sent correctly!
This and all other scenarios worked properly
, Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Version 3.0 the attached scenario worked right. But since I am using sipp
3.1 (SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06.)
the following error occurs with the same scenario:
--- The label 'stop_now' was not defined
Under Version 3.0 the attached scenario worked right. But since I am using sipp
3.1 (SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06.)
the following error occurs with the same scenario:
--- The label 'stop_now' was not defined (index 3, ontimeout attribute)
What is going
Hi All,
is there anybody who has experience with timeout/ontimeout and can show how to
deal within a scenario?
Thanks,
Wolfgang.
Deutsche Telekom AG
Zentrum Technik Einführung
Wolfgang Kanngießer
Winterfeldtstraße 21, D-10781 Berlin
the call until that message has already been received. Can
you provide a few more details about what you are trying to do? If you
are just trying to set a global run time limit you can do -timeout 60s on
the command line.
Charles
Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL
Hi Dave,
recently I have tried to create robustness testcases included binary data.
Therefore I inserted in a send message some whitespaces as placeholder.
Then, I have edit the file with a hex-editor (e.g. notepad++) to change the
whitespaces
with non printable data 0x01..0x1fh.
These data are
on the sipp-devel list.
Regards,
Olivier Boulkroune
_
De : Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2007 10:26
À : Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin)
Cc : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : [Sipp-users] remote control
Hi all
Hi all,
In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip
test tool.
We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user
and trunk).
Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions.
Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a
Hi all,
In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip
test tool.
We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user
and trunk).
Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions.
Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a
Hi all,
In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip
test tool.
We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user
and trunk).
Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions.
Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a
13 matches
Mail list logo