Re: [Sipp-users] SIPp3.1 - scenario breaks whith exitcode 139

2008-07-14 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Nachricht- Von: Charles P Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 17:23 Wolfgang, I tried the scenario with the SVN trunk and did not get an error. Charles Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/07/2008 07:07 AM

[Sipp-users] SIPp3.1 - scenario breaks whith exitcode 139

2008-07-07 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi all, recently I am asking for a error segmentation fault due to the external commands, i.e. action exec command=echo pass verdict.log/ /action The problem is still relevant but all scenarios worked properly until sipp2.0. There are any hints? Thanks,Wolfgang. Deutsche Telekom AG

[Sipp-users] SIPp3.1 - scenario breaks whith exitcode 139

2008-06-25 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi, a scenario containing the following element: action exec command=echo pass verdict.log/ /action breaks whith the error segmentation fault (Speicherzugriffsfehler) and the exitcode 139. sipp -v - SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06. This scenario worked

[Sipp-users] SIPp3.1 - scenario breaks whith exitcode 134

2008-06-17 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi, what is going wrong? I am now trying SIPp version 3.1 and my user-scenario breaks whith the following info: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080bc320 *** Abgebrochen $? - (exitcode=134), but all messages were sent correctly! This and all other scenarios worked properly

Re: [Sipp-users] a bug related to the label naming?

2008-05-05 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
, Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Under Version 3.0 the attached scenario worked right. But since I am using sipp 3.1 (SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06.) the following error occurs with the same scenario: --- The label 'stop_now' was not defined

[Sipp-users] a bug related to the label naming?

2008-04-30 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Under Version 3.0 the attached scenario worked right. But since I am using sipp 3.1 (SIPp v3.1-TLS-PCAP, version unknown, built Apr 29 2008, 14:46:06.) the following error occurs with the same scenario: --- The label 'stop_now' was not defined (index 3, ontimeout attribute) What is going

[Sipp-users] timeout braching

2008-04-10 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi All, is there anybody who has experience with timeout/ontimeout and can show how to deal within a scenario? Thanks, Wolfgang. Deutsche Telekom AG Zentrum Technik Einführung Wolfgang Kanngießer Winterfeldtstraße 21, D-10781 Berlin

Re: [Sipp-users] About branchig due ontimeout

2008-04-01 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
the call until that message has already been received. Can you provide a few more details about what you are trying to do? If you are just trying to set a global run time limit you can do -timeout 60s on the command line. Charles Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL

[Sipp-users] Binary Encoded Data as part of scenario file or inffile?

2008-03-27 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi Dave, recently I have tried to create robustness testcases included binary data. Therefore I inserted in a send message some whitespaces as placeholder. Then, I have edit the file with a hex-editor (e.g. notepad++) to change the whitespaces with non printable data 0x01..0x1fh. These data are

Re: [Sipp-users] remote control

2007-11-08 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
on the sipp-devel list. Regards, Olivier Boulkroune _ De : Kanngiesser, Wolfgang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2007 10:26 À : Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) Cc : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] remote control Hi all

Re: [Sipp-users] remote control

2007-11-07 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi all, In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip test tool. We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user and trunk). Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions. Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a

Re: [Sipp-users] remote control

2007-11-07 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi all, In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip test tool. We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user and trunk). Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions. Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a

[Sipp-users] remote control

2007-11-07 Thread Kanngiesser, Wolfgang
Hi all, In my opinion is a remote control capability a very important feature for a sip test tool. We want to run tests of media gateways by the simulation of both sides (user and trunk). Therefore, the need is to coordinate all actions. Is there no possibility to extend sipp whith such a