Hi all,
The package creation is based on the kernel version shipped with Debian. I
do not want to change the kernel by default. It is the approach selected by
Dann and i think it is the best one. Debian developers spend a lot of time
to ship a kernel coherent for the distribution, i think it is
Hi all,
I perfectly understand your position but as i said before, it seems to me
that this is the procedure selected by Dann (but maybe i missed something).
I do not disagree with that approach (keeping the same kernel for
everything) and Dann did a great job in creating scripts to ease the
-0500, geoffroy vallee wrote:
Hi all,
I started to port systemimager 3.7.5 on Debian sarge based on the
systemimager-debian repository. Please, find in attachment my first
patches/files.
The modifications allow one to create all standard packages modulo the
following limitations
+1,8 @@
+systemimager (3.7.6-0gv1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream release
+
+ -- Geoffroy Vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:23:49 -0500
+
systemimager (3.7.5-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
Index: trunk/debian/rules
Hi all,
A small patch for systemimager-debian. This patch allows one to create
binary packages on both Debian unstable and stable.
Index: control.in
===
--- control.in (revision 1)
+++ control.in (revision 7)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Hi all,
In order to create packages for systemimager-3.8.0, i had to use the
following files, which are not in systemimager-debian's trunk
LVM2.2.02.18.tgz
device-mapper.1.02.17.tgz
Thanks,
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
Hi all,
I tried to send this message during the week-end but i did not see appear on
the mailing-list so i resend it... sorry if you receive it multiple times.
A small patch for systemimager-debian. This patch allows one to create
binary packages on both Debian unstable and stable.
Index:
I think Dann prefers to have patches inline...
2007/3/28, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps instead of sending the patch in-line, send them as an attachment.
Would that help?
Cheers,
Bernard
On 3/28/07, geoffroy vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dann,
I have big issues sending
Hi all,
First patch for the creation of Debian packages that match the set of RPMs.
This first patch only concerns the file debian/control.arch.in, i will send
a patch for debian/control.in and then debian/rules if this one is acceptable.
Note that i changed the name of the existing package
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 05:00, Andrea Righi wrote:
Moreover, I wasn't able to follow all the details about the Debian efforts
(even if I hope to be able to contribute soon), but (at least) I'd like to
say a big *thank you* to Dann and Geoffoy. There're a lot of requests for
the Debian/Ubuntu
On Friday 25 May 2007 01:03, you wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:00:11AM -0400, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:01, you wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:34:40AM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
Hi,
If python2.4-dev is not installed, it is not possible to create
On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:30, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:05:16AM -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: valleegr
Date: 2007-05-31 10:05:13 -0500 (Thu, 31 May 2007)
New Revision: 86
Modified:
branches/gvallee-3.8/debian/control.in
Log:
Add build-dep on
Piotr,
Did you check if iptables do block by default multicast UDP traffic ?
Regards,
On Saturday 07 July 2007 06:53, Piotr Bratek wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install OSCAR on my 6node cluster. I use Fedora Core 5
and Oscar version 5.0 It seems to install on the server node without
issue,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Bernard Li wrote:
Of course, Geoffroy needs to move his files to the new repository first.
I do not even know if i have write access to the SIS repository for
systemconfigurator and i think Erich did move everything. So do whatever you
want, i will check what is
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
Hi Dann,
The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
does include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch independent
(it may be used on
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
Geoffroy Valle'e wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Geoffroy,
I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote:
Geoffroy VALLEE wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
Hi Dann,
The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but
does include ELF
Hi all,
In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the
--no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want users
to manually start the daemons (because i guess that at the end they will have to
do so)?
Just a question i asked to myself comparing
Hi all,
I saw a problem with SystemConfigurator: the Debian changelog
(debian/changelog) for SystemConfigurator-2.2.10 (tags/sc_2.2.10) is not
up-to-date. As a result the generated Debian packages from the tag has a
wrong version (2.2.9) which may be confusing for users (i think we can even
Hello,
I just checked-in a patch that should fix the problem. If someone thinks
my patch is not good, please speak up i will revert it.
Best regards,
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:21 -0600, Eric Ross wrote:
I am trying to build debs using the latest code from subversion, and I
encounter this
:
Hi Geoffroy:
On 12/3/07, Geoffroy Vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked-in a patch that should fix the problem. If someone thinks
my patch is not good, please speak up i will revert it.
Thanks for the fix -- do you mind merging that to branch-4.0.x too?
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi all,
Few questions about systemconfiguration:
- systemconfigurator-2.2.11 has been released but no tags exist in SVN.
The latest tag in 2.2.10-2. Is it normal?
- for Debian packages, the Debian changelog includes the
systemconfigurator changelog and the changelog at the top directory is
changelog issues?
Thanks,
best regards,
Erich
On Monday 17 December 2007 22:03, Geoffroy Vallee wrote:
Hi all,
Few questions about systemconfiguration:
- systemconfigurator-2.2.11 has been released but no tags exist in SVN.
The latest tag in 2.2.10-2. Is it normal?
- for Debian
Hi,
Before to check-in this fix, i would like to check-in the attached patch which
fixes errors with the Debian package.
May i check-in these modifications into trunk?
Regards,
Quoting Geoffroy Vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sure i think i have a write access. Will try to fix that tomorrow
Hi all,
Ferrol has been working on the extension of SystemImager for a diskless
support. He did a pretty good job, the implementation being not intrusive.
Please find a description of the modification, a patch for si_prepareclient and
a new Perl module for SystemImager that actually implements
@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: geoffroy vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008 05:02:23 GMT -05:00 USA/Canada - États de l'Est
Objet: Re: [Sisuite-devel] patch for a diskless support
Hi,
I am curious about the aproach taken but cannot easilly recognize it from
possible to
take them.
Regards,
- Mail Original -
De: Erich Focht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À: geoffroy vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008 13:42:53 GMT -05:00 USA/Canada - États de l'Est
Objet: Re: [Sisuite-devel] patch
Hi Bernard,
I will try to do that today.
Thanks,
- Mail Original -
De: Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À: geoffroy vallee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Juillet 2008 17:55:25 GMT -05:00 USA/Canada - États de l'Est
Objet: Re
Hi all,
I did a port of SystemImager to Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64 since i was facing quite
a few challenges with the latest unstable tag. This port is based on the 4.1.6
unstable tag (that version was selected for different reasons that i cannot
explain here) and is based on a 3.2 kernel.
I tested
29 matches
Mail list logo
