Re: [announce] s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0

2015-06-20 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 2015-06-19 19:19, Les Aker wrote: Looks like s6-linux-init 0.0.1.0 pulls s6 in as a build-time dependency. Not a huge issue, but might be worth updating the docs to clarify that until the next release removes that? I've learned to trust your docs and build tools enough that I spent a while

Re: [announce] s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0

2015-06-19 Thread Les Aker
Looks like s6-linux-init 0.0.1.0 pulls s6 in as a build-time dependency. Not a huge issue, but might be worth updating the docs to clarify that until the next release removes that? I've learned to trust your docs and build tools enough that I spent a while hunting for what I was doing wrong :)

Re: [announce] s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0

2015-06-18 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 18/06/2015 05:12, Guillermo wrote: I did a quick run and found out that in generated execline scripts except the stage 1 init, the shebang line starts with #!execlineb. Yes (unless you use slashpackage). And on the machines where I tested, it's not a problem as long as execlineb is in the

Re: [announce] s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0

2015-06-17 Thread Guillermo
Hi, 2015-06-17 17:27 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot: s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0 is out. It is a new package that, for now, only contains one program, and more documentation than source code. :) Its goal is to automate the creation of stage 1 (/sbin/init) binaries for people who want to run

[announce] s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0

2015-06-17 Thread Laurent Bercot
Hello, s6-linux-init-0.0.1.0 is out. It is a new package that, for now, only contains one program, and more documentation than source code. :) Its goal is to automate the creation of stage 1 (/sbin/init) binaries for people who want to run s6-svscan as process 1. Unfortunately, it has to