Hi,
I'd like to discuss an idea of more dynamic argv manipulation.
Since execline heavily relies on chain loading it becomes very
important whether block is executed directly or via fork; add to that
extreme importance of ENV vars as a way to carry state through chain
loading and it becomes
Thanks for crystal clear response and for keeping design clean, while
not forgetting about practical aspects of real-life use-cases. `-s`
switch is what I wanted indeed.
Strangely, despite writing in execline more or less for a week,
concept that "nothing leaks from a block" never crossed my
ercot <ska-skaw...@skarnet.org> wrote:
> On 20/05/2016 18:09, Max Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> so it uses "zero word" and "null word" interchangeably, which doesn't
>> help either :) "zero word" seems closer to "empty word" (==no
>>
>
> Not if it succeeds.
> However, backtick -i will exit on error: you can use that difference in
> program flow to create the sequence you need.
I didn't find a construct where rest of the program can be executed in
same process as `backtick`, or at least forked after `backtick`.
Closest I
