Hmmm... I think there are more recent versions of tomcat since that message
was composed.
What is the need for re-releasing 1.0.16? It seems to be fine as it is, a
couple of touches to the docs, and a comment on the site saying that this is
the final release and you could close this chapter...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12512.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry for pressing the commit button to early. Please look at Bug 12513.
Martin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
] +---
[echo] | Build environment for Jakarta-Slide 20020911
[echo] |
[echo] | Note:
[echo] | If ${property.name} is displayed for a library
[echo] | instead of 'true', that library is not present.
[echo
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12533.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi!
No responses to my last post so far, so I will try again:
What do you guys think about a wrappers.catalina.SlideUserDatabase class,
implementing the org.apache.catalina.UserDatabase interface, and a factory
to go along with it.
The class would authenticate users against the slide user
Hi All!
Question: Does slide's DeltaV implementation support the DeltaV Workspaces
concept? Does it support version labelling?
I am referring specifically to a scenario from the webdav draft goals
document
(http://www.webdav.org/deltav/goals/draft-ietf-webdav-version-goals-01.txt).
In this
It looks like org.apache.slide.util.HashMapObjectCache does not
respect maxSize parameter passed in constructor. Maybe the patch
included below makes sense:
--- HashMapObjectCache.java.bak Wed Sep 11 21:28:01 2002
+++ HashMapObjectCache.java Wed Sep 11 21:28:16 2002
@@ -153,7 +153,8 @@
10 matches
Mail list logo