Merging the webdav client into httpclient sounds like the best idea to me.
If this does not work for any reason, it might be an option to move
the webdav client to vfs commons. Or maybe a new commons component?
Oliver
2007/6/3, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone,
Will do an
Merging the webdav client into httpclient sounds like the best idea to me.
If this does not work for any reason, it might be an option to move
the webdav client to vfs commons. Or maybe a new commons component?
Oliver
2007/6/3, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone,
Will do an
with the RDBMS store that we have all but abandoned it
for the much more reliable txfile store : /
Would it be possible to blend the two? Like with a shared drive for
the files but using the db for the properties etc?
cheers
-Eiki, Idega Software
On Apr 17, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Oliver Zeigermann wrote
Hi folks!
I have just started a discussion about what is the state of the Slide
project in the Jakarta general list.
I'd be glad if people from this took part in that discussion!
Cheers and thanks in advance
Oliver
-
To
Hi Shobana!
I suspect this exception is due to a concurrency conflict. What
isolation level do you use for MySQL?
Oliver
2006/7/3, Krishnan, Shobana (Cognizant) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm using Slide with MYSQL and tried load testing the application with
300 concurrent threads.
I get the
I recommend to have alook at
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-slide/ConcurrencyIssues
Oliver
2006/7/20, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Shobana!
I suspect this exception is due to a concurrency conflict. What
isolation level do you use for MySQL?
Oliver
2006/7/3, Krishnan, Shobana
Folks,
after I have not done any work for the Slide project for quite some
time and do not see any change in the near future, I am considering
myself an inactive committer and will unsubscribe from the lists.
For any problems occuring along with commons transaction please
contact the commons
initially looking to integrate some of that work
and some utility software software to help new users of slide.
I have been active on the user list for quite a while and have already
contributed some documentation.
I dont know what else to say .
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Paul
Make a zip file of your code and add it as an *attachment* to the entry.
Oliver
On 8/4/05, Thomas Bellembois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to donate my work about quota to the Slide community.
I tried to create a bugzilla entry but I don't know how to attach my
source code
Paul,
either a committer or you - yourself - propose(s) you as a committer.
Afterwards each committer can cast a vote. If you have three positive
votes and no negative ones you can become a committer yourself. Some
advertisement of yourself in which you describe what you have done
for/with the
Hi Bertrand!
You would have to create a bugzilla entry including your code for
inspection. To donate your work to the Slide project you will have to
put it under the Apache Software License which will grant all rights
to anyone.
Oliver
On 7/28/05, Bertrand Tignon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a very interesting thing to do, but will certainly be
quite a lot of work.
Anyway, looking forward to your stuff.
Oliver
On 6/9/05, cosmic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be hosting a thesis on high performance tree structures for SQL.
I have read in slide-dev useful comments
you agree?
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Oh, well, they relate to this bug:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35201
Thus upgrading 2.1 as well would be I good idea I guess.
Oliver
On 6/3/05, Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Oliver,
What
Ooops, sorry, just saw your commits, so this has already been done.
Oliver
On 6/5/05, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly agree and will do so ASAP.
Oliver
On 6/4/05, Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an example of a bugfix that really needs to be applied
+1 to do so, unfortunately, I won't be able to help :(
Oliver
On 5/13/05, Stefan Lützkendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
because we couldn't decide for a new structure of slide repository we should
migrate to svn using
the current structure. It is easy to restructure it later by
All four paths must be different. The work directories contain
temporary transaction files.
Oliver
On 5/4/05, Thomas Bellembois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know exactly how and when are used the 4 paths (2*2)
used by the TxXMLFileDescriptorsStore and TxFileContentStore.
No objections from me, go ahead.
Oliver
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:54:44 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
while investigating slides performance with large collections I observed
that the default store parameter lock-cache-size is to small for the txfile
store.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:32:23 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both look useful, although I'm not sure I understand how #1 actually
works. It's late, so my brain's not working right, but could you explain
it a little? :)
Yes, my explanations wasn't very good: In WebdavUtils there is
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:14:44 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, a couple suggestions. Can you add a log message when you catch all
Exceptions thrown when creating the PathMapper? That makes it easier to
tell what went wrong when the error occurs :). And, the authentication
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:42:53 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Yes, my explanations wasn't very good: In WebdavUtils there is this
method getRelativePath which translates the request to the path used
for the request. The hook in (1) allows you to supply a
(1) A hook mechanism that allows a custom mapping from http request to
path and also can be used to pass the request to the store level
(2) Possibility to force (re-)authentication from the store layer -
especially from WCK
This should not cause any backward incompatibilities and hopefully is
no
The Commons Community is proud to announce the second beta release of
Commons Transaction 1.1!
Commons Transaction provides utility classes commonly used in transactional
Java programming.
The second beta does not add new features, but mainly fixes known
bugs, adds some tests, and provides more
I have committed this extension. Hopefully, it does not cause any
incompatibility issues, but it should not as the additional element is
in the Slide namespace.
Oliver
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:04:34 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST
(req.getHeader(content-length)).longValue())
and this seems to return the correct length, so I guess it is no limitation
inside the web container, what do you think?
thanks in advance
SVen
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:11:39 +0100, Sven Pfeiffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it must happen somewhere in
NodeRevisionContent.bufferContent(InputStrem in), because this method returns
the wrong value.
Not necessarily. If the body already has the wrong size - which I suspect.
Oliver
the
org.apache.slide.store.txfile.TxFileContentStore.
And I put the file on it using WindowsXPs netfolders.
Has anyone an idea why I can't upload larger files?
thanks in advance
SVen
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005
then we
are back in the positiv range and so it stores the file.
What do you think?
Am I right with this?
Thanks in advance
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Subject
not
uploaded.
a file with the name is created, and 201 Created is printed on the server,
but there is no content, the size is 0 kb.
Files smaller then 2 GB are copied normal.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:40 PM
Great,
congratulations to your first commits!
No objections to removing the jars.
Oliver
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:50:09 +0900, Carlos Villegas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As you see I commited some small fixes to the OJB stuff. Also to test my
new committer privileges!
I've replaced the
Folks,
after a long time I recently tried to use the command line client, but
it did not seem to connect to a Slide server with JAAS authentication
turned on. Is it that I am doing something wrong or is it really
broken?
Oliver
Works for me now, no idea what went wrong.
Sorry for the noise :(
Oliver
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:58:15 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
after a long time I recently tried to use the command line client, but
it did not seem to connect to a Slide server with JAAS
can't access or delete them.
Would it be possible to manage this problem in the store ?
Thomas
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
You have to consider the complete size of the path with must not be
larger than 255 on windows. The WebDAV path shown below is only a bit
more than 220, but you
Sorry for changing the release again, but I forgot to use the version
that fixed the latest known bug.
Oliver
On 13 Jan 2005 17:05:31 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ozeigermann2005/01/13 09:05:30
Modified:wck build.properties.sample build.xml
Folks,
shouldn't we have a first beta of 2.2 soon? I have heard rumors that
migrating to SVN is currently discouraged because of technical
problems. Should we bring out a beta before migration? Or rather
wait?
Oliver
-
To
!
For login 'cvillegas' will be fine.
Thanks and as they say here in Japan Gambarimasu!
Carlos
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Carlos,
welcome as a Slide committer!
In order to get you CVS access I will need to know which is your
desired apache login. You will get an email adress like [your
Most likely this is a limitation of the store. Is it the file store?
Then the limitation might be caused by the OS as the file system will
be used.
Oliver
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:41:24 +0100, Thomas BELLEMBOIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Apparently there are some troubles with Slide when
The Commons Community is proud to announce the 1.0.1 maintenance
release and the first 1.1 beta release of Commons Transaction.
Download page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/transaction/downloads.html
Project website:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/transaction/
Oliver
(on behalf of the
I guess it can not be loaded because it is not in your classpath. I
really do not see through all this user auto creation thing. Anyway,
for WCK I use
org.apache.slide.structure.SubjectNode as the users role and it seems to work,
Oliver
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:27:47 +0100, Sven Pfeiffer
[EMAIL
Which store?
Oliver
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:33:40 +0100, Sven Pfeiffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
there seems to be a limitation of the file site in slide 2.1 final.
no matter how large the files are, if they are larger than round about 561 MB
and if I want to store larger files
What do the properties say? The original size? Does your file system
support larger files?
Oliver
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:42:14 +0100, Sven Pfeiffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TxFileContentStore
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
version of slide, but I am not sure.
thank you for your support
SVen
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:50 PM
To: Sven Pfeiffer
Cc: Slide Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: file size limitation in slide 2.1
By the following votes with no vetos Carlos Villegas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has been elected as a new committer for the Jakarta Slide project:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Jacob Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Stefan
Carlos,
welcome as a Slide committer!
In order to get you CVS access I will need to know which is your
desired apache login. You will get an email adress like [your
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what do you want as your login?
More information for committers can be found here:
The problem is that no transaction has been started when doing a GET
on a collection as your browser does. However, one is needed in order
to create a user. The questions is why this is so. There used to be a
problem with the generation of the HTML for a collection being done
outside of a
Looks like the JDOM version in your classpath is not the one Slide
expects (should be 1.0, I guess)
Oliver
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:19:25 +0100, Sven Pfeiffer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
I was just trying to download and deploy the webapp in
jakarta-slide-server-bin-2.1.zip.
When
I'd like to nominate Carlos Villegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
a committer for the Slide project.
Carlos has contributed to Slide for a long time and has finally
started the OJB store.
Of course, he has my +1
Cheers,
Oliver
-
To
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:05:52 +0100, Thomas Draier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it's ok for you, i'll commit it, but i don't really know yet where i
should put it - bugfix in 2.1 or 2.2 ? i'd like the patch to be tested
by some people before going to a release, cause it might cause some
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:01:08 +, Eirikur Hrafnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I spoke to soon...
The problem with this setup is that you get mixed encodings. I want to
use ISO-8859-1 for the default system encoding
(-Dfile.encoding=ISO-8859-1) but I have to have the
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:23:15 +, Eirikur Hrafnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28.12.2004, at 18:53, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:01:08 +, Eirikur Hrafnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fortunately, at least with Oracle and the thin driver, that works with
an ISO
Hi,
the StandardRDBMSAdapter uses Sybase / MS SQLServer dialect. Try one
of the other adapters for hsqldb.I have heard Postgres is always
closest to the standard. To answer the next question: It is called
StandardRDBMSAdapter as Sybase / MS SQLServer where the only initially
supported databases.
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:01:08 +, Eirikur Hrafnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the patch that Thomas put in Bugzilla and it looks like it
could work but I think the FAQ or the Wiki should contain clear
instructions on how to use Slide in a non UTF-8 environment.
Would you please
,
after %xx decoding the URL. If not specified, ISO-8859-1 will be used.
As opposed to UTF-8.
-Eiki
On 24.12.2004, at 09:37, Eirikur Hrafnsson wrote:
On 23.12.2004, at 17:47, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Certainly not a showstopper. Encoding is set in the Tomcat connector
and defaults
Certainly not a showstopper. Encoding is set in the Tomcat connector
and defaults to UTF-8.
Thomas had a patch that can find out in most scenarios what the URL is
encoded in and I guess he will add it to 2.2 and 2.1.1
Oliver
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:07:41 +, Eirikur Hrafnsson [EMAIL
I have checked the server src and Tomcat bundles and to me they look
reasonable.
Do not forget to post the announcement to TSS once the distribution
has been rolled out.
Thanks for the nice work :)
Oliver
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:16:38 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded
.
-James
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 00:04 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
can we roll out the 2.1 release before Christmas? James, do you have
any time left? Would be great!
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:44:12 -0400, BillyJoe McCue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took James's advise and setup my project as Swingdaver on sourceforge.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/swingdaver
Great!
I chose the GPL for this project because it seemed to feel fitting. I
hope this doesn't
With the following votes the Slide community has decided to release
Slide 2.1 final:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Stefan Lützkendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Jacob Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Folks,
can we roll out the 2.1 release before Christmas? James, do you have
any time left? Would be great!
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:23 PM
To: 'Slide Developers Mailing List'
Subject: RE: New feature for internally repeating
conflicting requests
Ok. I'll try that.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann
Mailing List'
Subject: RE: New feature for internally repeating
conflicting requests
Ok. I'll try that.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:04 PM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:00:02 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean. I'd like to understand the problem
with the global mutex and transactions lock a little better. Is the global
lock a DB lock too or is it just a standard mutex lock? If it's a
fixed in the 2.1 release
branch and I wanted everyone to be aware of it. My team encountered this bug
doing multi-threaded testing of our application which is backed by Slide.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:52:02 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A real problem is that the ConcurrencyConflictException
doesn't make
it past LockMethod when it bubbles up from the store. In LockMethod
its caught in a generic Exception catch block at line 368 and
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:07:26 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:55:58 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:52:02 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A real problem
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:32:33 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem. BTW, I found out what needs to change in the DB2RDBMSAdapter for
it to pick up this exception. The error code returned by DB2 is -911 not
911. Just change the case statement and it picks it up. :-)
Well,
a 500 error when it gets this exception and
applications don't have a way to deal with that.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: New feature
Developers Mailing List'
Subject: RE: New feature for internally repeating conflicting requests
Ok. I'll try that.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:04 PM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Great new feature! Do you already have any alternative implementations for them?
Oliver
On 15 Dec 2004 16:26:52 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
masonjm 2004/12/15 08:26:52
Modified:src/share/org/apache/slide/common
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:55:58 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:52:02 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it would be great except that AbstractStore.java catches throwables
including Errors and is wrapping the Error inside
PROTECTED] schrieb am 14.12.04 14:20:18:
On 14-dec-04, at 9:58, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
Slide 2.1 rc1 has been released and discovered no major problems.
That's why I'd like to see a 2.1 final now as it is a big
step ahead
from 2.0!
+1
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:50:01 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver,
Unforunately DB2 doesn't seem to set the error code in the vendorCode field
as you would expect it to do, but the StandardRDBMSAdapter createException
implementation picks up the concurrency error with its
.
To be honest, I don't mind releasing a 2.1.1 the beginning of January if
we need to.
-James
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 22:52 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Subject says it all...
Cheers,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e
Folks,
Slide 2.1 rc1 has been released and discovered no major problems.
That's why I'd like to see a 2.1 final now as it is a big step ahead
from 2.0!
Here is my +1,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:25:03 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In AbstractWebdavMethod.java where you implemented the code to retry upon
conflict you have a condition that there not be an external transaction in
progress. Is this necessary as I'd like Slide to retry upon conflict
, 7 Dec 2004 18:17:33 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
everyone who has watched some of my evil commits knows my style:
Simple and dirty. This one is no different. I had to make
ConcurrencyConflictException an error to let it come through untouched
to the abstract
to it
if (contentLength == -1 || retryUponConflict) {
contentLength =
revisionContent.getContentBytes().length;
}
However, this is not a really good soltution...
Oliver
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:43:33 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Subject says it all...
Cheers,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.1 now uses the final release of Jakarta Commons Transacion 1.0. The
only thing changed from RC1 is that license and notice are now
included.
I am currently preparing deadlock exception for the file store in
Commons Transacion 1.1 which would be a great match for Slide 2.2
Oliver
On 14 Dec
There it is: real deadlock detection for tx file store based on a CVS
head build of commons transaction.
I am hoping we can have the Slide 2.2 release cycle synchronized with
the one of commons tx 1.1
Oliver
On 14 Dec 2004 12:31:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ozeigermann
drivers are very, very 'sensitive';
move to jtds. :)
On 10 Dec 2004, at 12:41, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
The MacroImpl.copy does not seem to cause any problems. Most likely
the blocking problems with SQLServer are due to the fine grain locking
which is the default one in CVS head. I
best option, since incubation can
take awhile.
FYI: If you release your source under the ASF license it will make it
easier should you decide to donate the code to Apache at some point in
the future (assuming you like that idea).
-James
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 16:28 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote
http://dbazine.com/tropashko4.shtml
Oliver
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:26:28 +0100, Arje Cahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something:
http://www.scenic-route.com/program/db/lists3.htm
-- Arjé
-Original Message-
From: Eirikur Hrafnsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
/root/expectedValue
receivedValue/slide/users/root/receivedValue
/XMLValueError
resultERROR/result
time291/time
/exceuteStep
I guess this is related to recent changes you have done, Stefan?
Oliver
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:37:28 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
want to contribute whenever I can. I just want to get this
code into the hands of interested developers as soon as possible and
have some credit or recognition of my efforts on it for my profile.
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Where are the sources
I haven't worked with SQL Server for a while. But the only thing I
could imagine is the change in MacroImpl.copy that I made to allow
copying read only resources. Maybe this is the problem?
Oliver
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:59:03 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
has any
Where are the sources?
Oliver
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:15:09 -0400, Billy Joe McCue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, sorry, long day doing this that and the other thing. I've fought
with this box ppp0 and network for a few hours and finally I have it up
again. (verified by outside help). So
You would have to fill out some legal stuff to donate your code to the
ASF. The code will be owned by the ASF then and the license will be
ASL 2.0. If the code was accepted by the Slide project you would
probably become a committer which is some sorf of credit, I guess.
Oliver
On Wed, 08 Dec
Folks,
from my point of view WCK is functional and stable. If I hear no
objections I will move it out of the proposals section from
slide/proposals/wck to slide/wck.
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
OK, got that, patch has been applied.
Oliver
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:37:32 +0100, Honoré David N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch simply move the code that copy permissions after the code that copy
the content and properties.
Le vendredi 3 Décembre 2004 16:37, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit
My fix went to CVS head, that's because there is no tag.
Oliver
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:21:59 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, sorry James for repeating the question to the dev list again before
reading your response :-)
But to clarify: in the case of my submission
Yes, this went into HEAD only. And it really should.
Oliver
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:05:14 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a commit log email is sent how do I determine what branches it was
applied to? This submission by Oliver for instance. I don't see a Tag line
so was
Folks,
everyone who has watched some of my evil commits knows my style:
Simple and dirty. This one is no different. I had to make
ConcurrencyConflictException an error to let it come through untouched
to the abstract request. A cleaner solution would be to add the
exception to all store methods
Folks,
I am a bit concerned about the duration of our release cycles. E.g.
some contributions in 2.1 are much older than half a year before they
are even released as stable.
Apache rule is to release early and often.
My proposal is to speed up the cycle for 2.2 and subsequent releases
and put
work for you, James. If this is too much for you, maybe we can
find another solution...
Oliver
-James
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 18:24 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
I am a bit concerned about the duration of our release cycles. E.g.
some contributions in 2.1 are much older than
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:slide-dev-return-14961-apmail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Oliver Zeigermann
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2004 18:52
An: Slide Developers Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [POLL] 2.2 release time frame
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004
Hi,
I understand the problem, but I do not understand the patch. Could you
explain, please?
Oliver
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:31:44 +0100, Honoré David N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an opensource Document management system named Dissco
(http://www.meteo.be/DISSCO/)
Come on, James, give it to us, roll it out.
Oliver
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:02:03 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's Sanity Check time!
I've uploaded the release for 2.1rc1 to
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/slide/2.1rc1/
Please make sure I haven't messed anything up or
which way your
trying to create the connection, the changes shouldn't have any effect if
you are using the WebDAVConnectionSpec to get your connection. Out of
curiosity... are there many people actually using the connector yet outside
of testing?
-Ryan
From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL
Just found a very special commont about JSR170 by Hani Suleiman
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=jsr_170_more_inmates_running
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:10 PM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Cc: Warwick Burrows
Subject: Re: 2.1 RC1?
Hi Warwick,
I was just asking the same question in one of my last posts
to the dev list. I asked what about the patch you
1 - 100 of 996 matches
Mail list logo
