ozeigermann2003/11/28 01:31:34
Removed: atticREADME
Log:
Finally removed bothering attic directory (not the CVS thing :), the local stuff
created by me
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike Oliver wrote:
Then would it not be a good idea to package the binaries such that the
starting working version uses the Tx stores?
Yes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nothing will be dropped completely :) Just talking about moving it to
a place that indicates the stuff is not functional and/or will not be
maintained any more. I still think we should do this with the JDBC
stores and also j2ee store in slidestore in
Can you post a link to the article to the list?
Ollie
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Martin Holz wrote:
Hmmm. I though the replacement for the database store would be the
JDBC / J2EE we are currently merging and getting to work. It is
available in the proposals section. Admittedly, it is
Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you post a link to the article to the list?
No. Oliver Zeigermann wrote an article for a computer magazine about
antlr, not about slide. Its oldfashioned paper and written in german.
You can find it in iX 2003/12, p. 128 (http://www.ix.de).
Martin
Danka,
I don't speak German.
Ollie
Martin Holz wrote:
Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you post a link to the article to the list?
No. Oliver Zeigermann wrote an article for a computer magazine about
antlr, not about slide. Its oldfashioned paper and written in german.
You
Oliver,
Are you meaning that the stores in the slidestore package are no
longer supported or needed???
Please clarify. I am using the XMLDestriptorStore and FileContentStore
and would like to know if they are in the attic and if so, replaced by
???
Ollie
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi
Hello Mike,
Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver,
Are you meaning that the stores in the slidestore package are no
longer supported or needed???
Please clarify. I am using the XMLDestriptorStore and
FileContentStore and would like to know if they are in the attic and
if so
Martin Holz wrote:
MemoryStore and and the database stores at slidestore are a problem,
since there is no direct replacement available.
Hmmm. I though the replacement for the database store would be the JDBC
/ J2EE we are currently merging and getting to work. It is available in
the
Martin Holz wrote:
Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please clarify. I am using the XMLDestriptorStore and
FileContentStore and would like to know if they are in the attic and
if so, replaced by ???
I would consider them obsolete. They should be replaced by
org/apache/slide/store
Excellent, thanks!
Ollie
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Martin Holz wrote:
Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please clarify. I am using the XMLDestriptorStore and
FileContentStore and would like to know if they are in the attic and
if so, replaced by ???
I would consider them obsolete
Hello Oliver,
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Holz wrote:
MemoryStore and and the database stores at slidestore are a
problem, since there is no direct replacement available.
Hmmm. I though the replacement for the database store would be the
JDBC / J2EE we are
and
FileContentStore and would like to know if they are in the attic and
if so, replaced by ???
I would consider them obsolete. They should be replaced by
org/apache/slide/store/txfile/TxFileContentStore and
TxXMLFileDescriptorsStore. The old stores did not support
transactions, which is absolutly required
ozeigermann2003/11/14 00:27:58
Added: atticREADME
Log:
Added a directory for code that is no longer supported or needed
CVS: --
CVS: PR:
CVS: If this change addresses a PR in the problem report
Hi!
As you may have seen, commit access has finally been granted to me and I
added a directory for code that is no longer supported or needed. I'd
propose to make this the new home for the stores in the slidestore
package. I guess this is a significant step, right? Do we need a vote?
Oliver
15 matches
Mail list logo
