Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-25 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 24 Nov 2003, at 17:20, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but doesn't contain any of the slide

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-25 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 24 Nov 2003, at 17:20, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but doesn't

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-24 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 23 Nov 2003, at 14:45, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Summing up content from other threads: Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like? I understand people want something to

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-24 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but doesn't contain any of the slide admin features (they could work, but I'm not interested in web-based

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-24 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but doesn't contain any of the slide admin features (they could work, but I'm not

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Summing up content from other threads: Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like? I understand people want something to download and go. Store issue can be solved without an RDBMS by using tx file store. Prolem is Slide is

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-23 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Summing up content from other threads: Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like? I understand people want something to download and go. Store issue can be solved without an RDBMS by using tx file

Re: Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 23 Nov 2003, at 14:45, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Summing up content from other threads: Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like? I understand people want something to download and go. Store issue

Binary Release / DISCUSSION: Slide 2.0 release

2003-11-18 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Summing up content from other threads: Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like? I understand people want something to download and go. Store issue can be solved without an RDBMS by using tx file store. Prolem is Slide is not standalone and can only be used with a web