Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
- off (*very long* for testsuite): No caching at all
OK, finally had it running without errors and it took 70 minutes only
(using file store). Not that bad...
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Just asking, not griping, isn't this a new feature or at least
enhancement? Are you sure this should go into the release branch?
Does it fit into the proposal What goes into the release branch I made:
(1) The aim of the release branch is to bring the release to a final state as fast as possible
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26430.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26430.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26520.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27024.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Martin!
I guess you forgot to check in the Lucene jar, right?
Cheers,
Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wam 2004/02/25 02:23:52
Added: src/stores/org/apache/slide/index
BasicExpressionFactoryTxtContainsSample.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Now that you ask, I must admit that point (2) of your proposal sounds
very strict (just like Linus Torvalds before releasing kernel 2.6.0).
I'd rather like to see something like this appended:
Non critical enhancements (or new features) that don't break backwards
API compatibility are allowed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27024.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Ingo,
all of this is OK with me :)
Just wanted to make sure our ideas of the release are aligned more or
less. I would feel comfortable to have (2) less strict in the way you
propose. For the release candidates - I thought we agreed on to have -
we can use this stricter rule.
Agreed?
Fine, fully agreed.
Ingo
Hi Ingo,
all of this is OK with me :)
Just wanted to make sure our ideas of the release are aligned more or
less. I would feel comfortable to have (2) less strict in the way you
propose. For the release candidates - I thought we agreed on to have -
we can
ozeigermann2004/02/26 03:31:21
Modified:src/share/org/apache/slide/content ContentImpl.java
Log:
Resource name is only set in create if empty - fixing bug #27024
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +7 -5
jakarta-slide/src/share/org/apache/slide/content/ContentImpl.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27024.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Ryan,
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2004 17:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full Text Search for MS Word and Excel files?
Let me see if I understand something. Search normally finds
resources based
on
As I promised some time ago I merged the classes from the slidestore
package into XMLResourceDescriptor. This results in a much cleaner
design and more obvious code and as a side effect makes all classes of
the slidestore package obsolete. Removed them...
ozeigermann2004/02/26 06:36:29
Modified:src/doc changelog.xml
Log:
Fixed invalid XML
Revision ChangesPath
1.89 +1 -1 jakarta-slide/src/doc/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
===
RCS file:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slide Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full Text Search for MS Word and Excel files?
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:31:43 +0100
In the store driven indexing framework (different to the event driven
stuff,
we still have to
: lib jdom-20040226-.jar
Removed: lib jdom-b9.jar
Log:
Replaced JDOM b9 with JDOM HEAD version checked out at 26th, February, 2004.
Adapted XMLOutputter code to this.
Revision ChangesPath
1.41 +7 -4
jakarta-slide/src/webdav/server/org/apache/slide
Ryan Rhodes wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slide Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full Text Search for MS Word and Excel files?
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:31:43 +0100
In the store driven indexing framework (different to the event
driven stuff,
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
In anticipation of the first 1.0 release of JDOM I have replaced the
b9 version with the JDOM HEAD checked out today (called
jdom-20040226-.jar). I have changed the build.xml and all classes that
used the removed methods for XMLOutputter. Changes should be
transparent
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27280.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the
request please visit http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-slide has an issue affecting it's community integration, and
Hi Ajay!
Ajay K. Mallik wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I have created the oracle schema and I think I got it right, but I am experiencing some issues using StandardRDBMSAdapter-the domain initialization fails and cannot load the servlet. I think the problem lies in some of the sql statements, so I wrote an
In anticipation of the first 1.0 release of JDOM I have replaced the b9
version with the JDOM HEAD checked out today (called
jdom-20040226-.jar). I have changed the build.xml and all classes that
used the removed methods for XMLOutputter. Changes should be transparent...
Oliver
Antoine Lévy
ozeigermann2004/02/26 05:40:54
Modified:src/stores/org/apache/slide/store/txfile
XMLResourceDescriptor.java
TxXMLFileDescriptorsStore.java
src/doc changelog.xml
Removed: src/stores/slidestore/file UriProperties.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
31 matches
Mail list logo
