Martin Holz wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
1.) What features not yet implemented should go into the Slide 2.0 release?
If Slide is considered a content repository as a combination of
underlying stores, global locks that live for the duration
Folks, just updated the web site and put a big Slide is alive text up.
Strikes the eye, but looks ugly, though... Maybe someone can help and
give it a more professional look? I am a programmer, you know...
Proposals, please!
Thanks,
Oliver
Richard Unger wrote:
Damn, I missed the striking bit!! That's 2 updates within one hour!
Incredible! I now actually beleive in the 2.0 release ;)
Well, well, the first version was ok in text, but very bad in design.
It's good you have not seen it ;)
Oliver
Richard Unger wrote:
Hi!
Nice work Oliver! This is the first time I have ever seen any change in
the slide webpage! cool!
Can only committers update the page? I can't do graphics either (also a
programmer) but I could write some docs...
Hmmm. Yes :( You would have to send them to me first. They
fragmentation.
All the committers are responsible for all the code: if we start asking
permissions to one another to modify code in the area where others
people is responsible, the development performance drops.
Don't go there.
On 18 Nov 2003, at 01:20, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
For the release and also
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 18 Nov 2003, at 01:56, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
bad marketing
-
I believe Slide has currently a major bug in its own self-marketing:
no matter how you look at it, Slide is *NOT* a content management
system. Probably Remy
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 18 Nov 2003, at 18:40, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Richard Unger wrote:
Hi!
Nice work Oliver! This is the first time I have ever seen any change in
the slide webpage! cool!
Can only committers update the page? I can't do graphics either (also a
programmer) but I
fragmentation.
All the committers are responsible for all the code: if we start
asking permissions to one another to modify code in the area where
others people is responsible, the development performance drops.
Don't go there.
On 18 Nov 2003, at 01:20, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
For the release
Eric Johnson wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I really wonder if we have a misunderstanding here.
Perhaps so. From the perspective of a non-committer, and rare
contributor (with an ongoing consideration of adopting Slide), I would
emphasize that the project is *open source*. Since people
Martin Holz wrote:
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i agree with stefano's observation that whiteboard and scratchpad
are the more usual names for this kind of thing. aligning naming
conventions isn't critical but it can help to make newbies feel at
home quicker.
Cocoon uses
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I really wonder if we have a misunderstanding here.
Let's consider an example: I certainly have no real idea of
the guts of Peter's code and he hardly has of mine. That's
fine as we both have our stuff to concentrate on. Now, when
there is a bug in Peter's code I turn
Christopher Lenz wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Martin Holz wrote:
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i agree with stefano's observation that whiteboard and scratchpad
are the more usual names for this kind of thing. aligning naming
conventions isn't critical but it can help
Why is the check for null locks in class AbstractWebdavMethod method
isLockNull(String uriStr) done outside of the embracing transaction???
In DeleteMethod everything was set up correctly to have reads in the
transaction as well!
Any ideas?
Oliver
I'd like to nominate Martin Holz [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a
committer for the Slide project.
He has contributed numerous bug reports and patches of high quality for
more than a year now. He also is a vivid and valuable contributor to a
wide range of discussions.
Having him as committer would
Here are the results of the functional test cases. Both J2EE from the
proposals sections (71 of 215) and tx file store (69 of 215) fail to
pass quite a number of tests while most failures seem to be unjustified.
This is may impression as the performed tests are a fresh check from
CVS. Before
My try of a summary of the links:
- Sometimes more than one request shall be processed atomically
- There are two possibilities to do so
- Transaction begin, commit, rollback methods
- Batch processing
- Transactions spanning multiple requests might be a thread to
concurrent access
- Bacht
[A] UNLOCK causes NPE in Cache
Fixed by previous commit. This turns all [A] into [1], thus leaving 19
errors with 4 causes.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
testsuite\junit\xmltestcases\functional\proppatch\code\PropPatchDeleteDAVPropertyWithPropFindOnContentLength.xml
Real bug: Due to wrong property content-length because of compression!
FIXED by previous commit
I understand that everyone had the chance to contribute to the threads
on 2.0 release and that they for the present time have come to an end.
This is my *proposal* intended for a final discussion round and will be
followed by a vote of the committers. I will prepare a list of topics to
vote
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Summing up content from other threads:
Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like?
I understand people want something to download and go. Store issue can
be solved without an RDBMS by using tx file
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Oliver,
first of all, many thanks for the great job you're doing! It's a
*pleasure* to see Slide resurrecting like this :-)
On 22 Nov 2003, at 00:05, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I understand that everyone had the chance to contribute to the threads
on 2.0 release
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
As a binary, this could work, yes. But in source, hard to do. Did some
reading and found out a project is not allowed to have more than one
CVS module...
?? cocoon has three.
Cocoon is not in Jakarta, I guess.
So, you can checkout sources together only.
??
cvs
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 23 Nov 2003, at 14:45, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 18 Nov 2003, at 02:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Summing up content from other threads:
Main question: What should a binary Slide release look like?
I understand people want something
I was wondering what to do with sources that require JDK1.4. There might
be switch in build.properties to enable compilation of them. Should they
go into a directory of their own like /src/jdk14?
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe,
RELEASE PLAN
-
As features contained in the current CVS HEAD are more than enough for a
new release and no new features are necessary to have a 2.0 release no
milestone releases should be needed. This means the release plan looks
rather simple:
- Slide 2.0beta release:
I have several issues with the Testsuite I am unsure to fix myself and
wonder who to turn to:
1.) Xerces jars in lib seem to be outdated. At least on my system, they
cause problems with system idenfiers. I replaced them with the latest
versions and everything works fine. Shall I check them in?
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 19 Nov 2003, at 05:03, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I am wondering why you check for any lock for the source uri. Also,
why no lock for the destination? Why is there no patch for the copy
method?
Could you please explain a little bit more?!
Glad you
Martin Dulisch wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
cvs checkout jakarta-slide/client
would download only the client
Hmm, right, but would anyone find it this way?
I think if it is documented on the website it should be no
problem to find.
If the client part is moved to a dedicated area I could
Proposal:
Slide 2.0 aims to provide a stable WebDAV-centric low-level content
management framework.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UnlockMethod tries to delete resources marked as null locks. Now, when
children have been added to the null resource (which actually works...)
it can not be deleted which seems to be just right. So line starting
from 215:
if (isLockNull(revisionDescriptor)) {
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
3.) Tests with LOCK method expect as owner /slide/users (as replaced
by some owner), but when being unauthenticated you are
/slide/unauthenticated. Shouldn't URI of unauthenticated be in users
as well? Like /slide/users/unauthenticated? Or should some owner be
less
Testcase
testsuite\junit\xmltestcases\functional\propfind\code\propfind207.xml
has a funny error:
The PROPFIND preceeding two DELETES somehow causes the test framework
not to execute the first DELETE, but simply filling in Http Version Not
Supported 505. Tomcat really shows no sign of
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
[E] Funny MOVE / COPY problem
Was a configuration error at my side. Multistore tests need collection
files_secondCollection.
In order to give this test any significance there should be a second
store configured at files_secondCollection
[B] LOCK or PROPFIND on lock return double values
If a resource is already locked LockImpl.lock creates a nested exception
doubling or tripling the error message. Do now know how to fix this.
Maybe some way to check if an exception has already been added to the
nested one
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare
minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but
doesn't contain any of the slide admin features (they could work, but
I'm
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 09:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 19 Nov 2003, at 05:03, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I am wondering why you check for any lock for the source uri. Also,
why no lock for the destination? Why is there no patch
the jakarta-pmc with a [RESULT] email for the election thread so that
someone can email the appropriate letter out on behalf of the pmc.
- robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 November 2003 10:09:10 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Committer
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
I have several issues with the Testsuite I am unsure to fix
myself and
wonder who to turn to:
1.) Xerces jars in lib seem to be outdated. At least on my
system, they
cause problems with system idenfiers. I replaced them with the latest
versions and everything
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
[B] LOCK or PROPFIND on lock return double values
I have a patch for this. Will check-in during till end of this week, latest
:)
Fine, that makes me smile :)
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Thanks a lot Christophe!
I will try it! Comments will follow!
Christophe Lombart wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the MySqlRDBMSAdapter for the new database store (J2EE JDBC)
provided by Oliver. It almost the same as the StandardStore expected
some delete statments.
It is not completly tested. I have
Christophe,
forgot to ask, I see you have the INNODB transactions, but which is your
MySQL version 4.0 or 4.1?
Thanks,
Oliver
Christophe Lombart wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the MySqlRDBMSAdapter for the new database store (J2EE JDBC)
provided by Oliver. It almost the same as the StandardStore
if you want.
Christophe
.
Message d'origine
De: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: mar. 25/11/2003 9:28
: Slide Developers Mailing List
Cc:
Objet: Re: MySqlRDBMSlAdapter
Christophe,
forgot to ask, I see you have the INNODB transactions
One thing I just noticed: In order to have only the significant parts
changed, could we settle on having MySql adapter inherit from Standard
adapter? That would make things easier for both of us :) I will create
the inherited version and check it into the CVS as soon as it is
finished. I will
LOMBART Christophe wrote:
4.1 is still on alpha. I never used it and I didn't check the differences and enhancements.
I'm going to test with this version today if I have time.
Last points :
* As you mentionnes in a previous mail, I receive some deadlock mainly with delete method in the
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
* Maybe StandardRDBMSAdapater should be renamed into SqlServerStore.
It seems you are using some delete statements specific to SqlServer.
Just noticed myself. You are talking about the delete statements, right?
Thanks for the input! I will clean this now... This should
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Another question. Which JDBC driver do you use. Anything you can recommend?
Sorry for bothering, still one thing: How is the URL composed for MySQL?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
LOMBART Christophe wrote:
I will try to find some times to build an OJBStore (just to make some experiences).
A Standard SQL store is interesting but if some slide users (like me) are using OJB, it should be nice to have the same way to access to the database. Later, some tests can be done with
Concerning URI length: I am with Christophe here: half the world
restricts URIs to 255 characters and it should be enough for normal
applications. As almost every request accesses the URI table it might be
a performance problem using blobs. So I would propose to leave this for
the default
LOMBART Christophe wrote:
What do you mean, I don't undestand
What I - at a first glance - am missing are primary, unique and foreign
key constraints. Is there a reason for this? I thought this is possible
with MySQL, isn't it?
As I said at a first glance. Should have taken a second ;)
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
2.) There are tests that seem to be specific to Tamino. What
to do with
them?
Of course, as discussed in previous mails, these should be
removed. Can you
tell which exactly are Tamino-specific? (our testsuite
expert is currently
out of office :)) If you
Got it running now with 4.1. Performed *manual* tests and it works fine.
Additionally, it works *fast*. This does not have to mean anything as it
runs locally on my machine...
Will run the testsuite now!
Oliver
Christophe Lombart wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the MySqlRDBMSAdapter for the new
Tests have shown the RDBMS store in the proposals section is at least
not worse than previous versions of stores working on DBs and also not
worse than the tx file store. Also, the *general* databse schema (which
basicly has been taken over from Ashoks contribution) is not supposed to
change
I noticed the bugzilla does not get the attention it might deserve. It
think this is partly due to the unclear state of many of the listed bugs.
To get a hand on this I propose to close all bugs not already assign to
anyone and ask contributors to readd the bugs that are still valid.
What do
it for the 2.1 release.
Oliver
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Tests have shown the RDBMS store in the proposals section is at least
not worse than previous versions of stores working on DBs and also not
worse than the tx file store. Also, the *general* databse schema (which
basicly has been taken over from
Wendt, Alexander wrote:
Concerning URI length: I am with Christophe here: half the world
restricts URIs to 255 characters and it should be enough for normal
applications. As almost every request accesses the URI table it might be
a performance problem using blobs. So I would propose to leave this
LOMBART Christophe wrote:
I'm using Oracle for one of my customers. I can try to do it for end of December.
Would be great. However, there is this bug in DBCP that does not set
isolation as the first statement in a transaction which is needed by
Oracle. The fix is trivial, but needs to be
Wendt, Alexander wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Thought it looks like the same old
jdbc-mysql-schema-mistake: BLOBs for uri - but pk(255) .. Silly!
Do not quite understand. What is silly here?
A decition to take BLOB instead of varchar(255) is normally based on using
more than 255 chars
Got it now, thanks for explaining :)
Wendt, Alexander wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Ooops. Does this mean MySQL allows you to insert values with more than
255 characters, but only truncates all that comes after character 255?
Hard to believe...
Not true:
If a value is unique on the first
Ingo Brunberg wrote:
2. Different from other DBs Orcale has no AUTO_INCREMENT or IDENTITY or
anything directly comparable to these, but uses sequences. This may mean
quite a lot of changes in the SQL :(
Excuse me if I sound like an idiot, but I think you can use sequences
in Oracle to emulate
Ahh, do it with the triggers! Seems I have slept far too much in my
lectures ;)
That's fine :)
Still, even if this seems to be that easy I hardly will get the port
ready this year. So, Christophe, if you are still volunteering to do it,
go for it! I will give you all the support I can. Maybe
in my fire;) *We need global non-blocking transaction locks*
Oliver
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Got it running now with 4.1. Performed *manual* tests and it works fine.
Additionally, it works *fast*. This does not have to mean anything as it
runs locally on my machine...
Will run the testsuite
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 17:42, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 09:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 19 Nov 2003, at 05:03, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I am wondering why you check for any lock
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 17:20, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 08:59, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I have a distribution of jetty+slide that is around 2Mb. It's bare
minimal, but very fast (boots in two seconds on my machine), but
doesn't
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
instead. Martin, please download the CLA
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas, read it, sign it, and fax it to
Jim at +1-410-803-2258 (then write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] just to confirm
that he got it).
Ahh, that's it? This email to Jim is still missing?!
Martin, would you
Now that the talks come to ports to DBs like Postgres that do not do
pessimistic locking, I have to come back to correctness of the tx
caching. As explained before I was afraid general caching did not work
in case the underlying store does not use pessimisctic locking. This
fear was caused by
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003, at 10:37, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Proposal:
Slide 2.0 aims to provide a stable WebDAV-centric low-level content
management framework.
-1 for content management framework, this is not what a CMF is.
Slide is a content repository and should focus
, and Windows batch actually is easy to read.
A variable reference looks like %var% as opposed to $var or ${var}
Oliver
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 25 Nov 2003, at 15:30, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Testsuite looks good :)
All the normal failures (14 only).
testsuite\junit\xmltestcases\functional\extra
Sounds nice :)
Richard Unger wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:37, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Proposal:
Slide 2.0 aims to provide a stable WebDAV-centric low-level content
management framework.
How about something like:
snip--
Slide 2.0 will provide a stable content
Why all those defaults? Looks to me as if this made insertion of
nonsense data possible?! Certainly I am missing something...
Oliver
Wendt, Alexander wrote:
OK .. no Attachement - then text (Sorry for that):
#
drop table if exists
behind an uncleaned state
- TProcessor.CMD -pattern *cases\\functional* -exclude *multi-user\\copy*
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
This is fairly easy when you have Windows. just cd into testsuite/bin
and run TProcessor.CMD. At least when your server runs on .
Otherwise you will have to change some
Wendt, Alexander wrote:
Zeigermann, Oliver wrote:
Why all those defaults? Looks to me as if this made insertion of
nonsense data possible?! Certainly I am missing something...
These defaults are only part of the result of first schema from Christophe.
I took a dump and then sort it, but I was
Christophe,
are you talking to me??? If so how come you think I am not interested in
Lucene???
Oliver
Christophe Lombart wrote:
I want to restart a debate on Lucene. My customer ask me to have a
search engine in our application in short term.
I know there is a implementation for searching
Ah, I see, it works now. Shall I check it in for you (I assume you have
not been granted commit access, yet)?
Oliver
Martin Holz wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, where is lib set (as referenced in classpath)? Do not seem to
get it running...
Copy the target
searches will look like,
but if you can generate such an AST you should be fine.
Oliver
Regards,
Christophe
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/26/2003 10:48 AM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Cc:
Subject:Re: Lucene
Sounds reasonable to me.
Alex?
Christophe?
You are the experts, I am your servant ;)
Oliver
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Why int(11) and not bigint (which is EXACTLY as a Java long?)...
Also, the only difference in the adapter from the standard to the MySQL
adapter is the fact that the lock
Martin Holz wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ah, I see, it works now. Shall I check it in for you (I assume you
have not been granted commit access, yet)?
Yes please. Needs a lot of cleanup, but its better than no tests on
Unix at all.
Done :)
For now I get 105 errors
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
The tx file store has *no real deadlock* detection, but simply assumes
there was a deadlock when transactions time out. This still is a TODO!
When you have 10 threads running, transactions take longer and finally
time out. For now I will add a timeout parameter to the tx
[D] is a result of another uncleaned test. Thus it is invalid...
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
After recent changes this is the current list of failures. There are 14
for known reasosons excecpt [D] (will investigate [D] further). The
tests revealed no remaining store bugs (but there certainly
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Christophe Lombart wrote:
It is not completly tested. I have a strange error when the data are
not compressed, here is the stack stace.
I know, it is not your fault! This is MY TODO! Unfortunately, it is
really tricky to get streams from blobs closed at the right time
Christopher Lenz wrote:
Index: MySqlSchema.sql
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-slide/proposals/stores/org/apache/slide/store/impl/rdbms/MySqlSchema.sql,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2
Hi, folks! Seems to be time for the vote upon the 2.0 release!
It is important (at least for me) that all committers regarding
themselves as active (of course including new committer Martin Holz)
give a vote here!
Of course, every topic gets my +1 :)
GENERAL
---
Slide 2.0 will provide a
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Oliver: told you! :-P
Yeah, ok, you told me :(
But I finally understood I was wrong :)
Blame and shame on me!
Oliver
On 27 Nov 2003, at 15:04, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 27 Nov 2003, at 12:16, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
STUFF TO BE REMOVED *NOW
it after I checked in the release plan I will generate
from the results of this *informal* vote.
Oliver
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Hi, folks! Seems to be time for the vote upon the 2.0 release!
It is important (at least for me) that all committers regarding
themselves as active (of course including
changes I feel I
need your agreement for.
As a sample this is what I would like to see:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
BUGZILLA
Bugzilla shall be the primary place for bug reports and associated
patches. As the status of quite some reports is unclear all reports not
yet assigned will be deleted
-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 27. November 2003 13:16
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Subject: VOTE: Slide 2.0 release
Hi, folks! Seems to be time for the vote upon the 2.0 release!
It is important (at least for me) that all committers regarding
Robert, thanks for taking the time to explain :)
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i would strongly suggest that you add the creation of at least one
release candidate to the plan. a release candidate has a lot of
advantages: not only does it allow a wider range of users to test it (a
good way to
Thanks, Martin!
By the way, have no access to my other email account today, so I could
not check it: have you been granted commit access, yet?
Martin Holz wrote:
Which version of ant is required for building? 1.5?
Ant 1.5 works fine for me. No idea if 1.4 or previous work...
RELEASE PLAN
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 08:12 AM, Martin Holz wrote:
However, if you use the interceptor, you will have problems
with rollbacks. I think, the interceptors are not informed,if
a rollback happened.
Btw. there is still a issue with NodeRevisionContent. You must not
Thanks for voting :-)
Wallmer, Martin wrote:
Another question: I placed a package org.apache.slide.search.basic.sample in
directory src/stores as a starting point for implementing a store specific
SEARCH. Do you think thats the right place for it?
Thanks for providing such an example in the
OT: Second try, while writing my first answer to this post, my computer
broke down (hardware problem, not evil Windows) :(
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Completely unofficially since I'm just a lurker on the Slide lists, but
+1 for Stefano and Pier as Slide committers! I'm ecstatic to see the
activity
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 13:16
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Subject: VOTE: Slide 2.0 release
Hi, folks! Seems to be time for the vote upon the 2.0 release!
It is important
Christopher Lenz wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Other:
- src/contrib will be removed
- src/examples will be removed
- src/admin will be removed
- src/tablib will be removed
+/-0
Not sure
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Saturday, November 29, 2003, at 07:00 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I think you'll find that Lucene will serve Slide's needs nicely -
you'll just have to be a little creative in how you build Lucene
Document objects and break things into fields. Lucene is a flat
It would be nice if we had a volunteer to do the release builds and
organise the uploads to Apache and mirror servers. I understand Robert
will give help and instructions.
Anyone?
Oliver
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 28 Nov 2003, at 06:17, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
robert burrell donkin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1 Dec 2003, at 13:17, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 1 Dec 2003, at 11:04, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
It would be nice if we had a volunteer to do the release builds and
organise the uploads to Apache and mirror servers. I understand
Robert will give help
By the following votes with no vetos Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been elected as a new committer for the Jakarta
Slide project:
Oliver Zeigermann ozeigermann at apache.org +1
Stefan Guggisberg stefan at apache.org +1
Peter Nevermann Peter.Nevermann at softwareag.com +1
Remy
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
LOMBART Christophe wrote:
I'm using Oracle for one of my customers. I can try to do it for end
of December.
Would be great. However, there is this bug in DBCP that does not set
isolation as the first statement in a transaction which is needed by
Oracle. The fix
When you read this there will be two new files in the CVS top level
- STATUS
- RELEASE-PLAN-2.0
Deletes, logger changes and moving of merged J2EE store will be done
*today*.
GENERAL
---
Slide 2.0 will provide a stable content repository for content
management systems / frameworks and other
Martin Holz wrote:
Hello Oliver,
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Deletes, logger changes and moving of merged J2EE store will be done
*today*.
Could you tag the state before deletion in cvs?
Of course!
Oliver
Wow, this was quick :)
What about Martin's account?
Oliver
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Karma granted! :-)
Pier
On 3 Dec 2003, at 11:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 3 Dec 2003, at 09:26, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
By the following votes with no vetos Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
101 - 200 of 996 matches
Mail list logo
