in
Namspace return false. In this case the macro store is not used.
Oliver
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:33:54 +0200, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added inexpensive scope check as proposed by Stefan.
I presume this step completes the task (of adding a MacroStore option
to Slide), could
Folks,
in order to find out which resources to lock for each request with
internal Slide locks I started to create a table which method accesses
which resource. It's here
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-slide/locksNeeded
Please fix my errors and fill in the fields where I put a '?' because
I did
I was wondering, shouldn't we have a dedicated release for the stores
as well? Of course they completely rely on the core, but it might be
an idea to decouple them so the same release might work with both 2.1
and maybe later with 2.2.
Might make release cycles of the core - and maybe even of the
could make any sense of it there. Maybe someone here...
Is it just non sense?
Oliver
-- Forwarded message --
From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:30:44 +0200
Subject: [Collections] DFAMap? (LONG)
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED
to check it in?
Why does the DELETE method dont need read access to the target. Doesn't
ir check the permissions and locks on the target tree?
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
in order to find out which resources to lock for each request with
internal Slide locks I
do you think ?
thomas
Le 18 oct. 04, à 09:24, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
+1 to all this.
I think we could begin restructuring the CVS HEAD soon - just make
sure everyone committed their patches before - and have it avaiable
for general release in 2.2
Oliver
James Mason
Thanks for that! I have almost implemented something that works for
the GET and PUT method. Hopefully I can commit it later today for
public inspection.
Oliver
P.S.: Any idea about the other methods still having '?'s in it?
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:39:24 +0200, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL
Done...
Oliver
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:15:20 +0200, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that! I have almost implemented something that works for
the GET and PUT method. Hopefully I can commit it later today for
public inspection.
Oliver
P.S.: Any idea about the other
In order to try it you need to set sequential-mode to fine-grain in
Domain.xml like
parameter name=sequential-modefine-grain/parameter
If you do locks in GET and PUT are no longer compatible to the ones in
other methods.
Oliver
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:14:31 +0200, Oliver Zeigermann
Added fine grain locks to all methods as listed in
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-slide/locksNeeded
All this still is work in progress and needs solutions for the methods
I am not very familiar with.
Please understand as well that this is an ad-hoc addition for each
method and will need as much
in Domain.xml
- remove exclusive locks from the Slide core as they are no longer
useful and may even be a hazard for people programming to the server
API
Oliver
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:12:52 +0200, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added fine grain locks to all methods as listed in
http
, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now set global write locks for the remaining methods. This is no
regression compared to the previous WebDAV level locking. Only for
those methods nothing has been won, but the gain in terms of
concurrency for the other methods should be immense.
Next
Wow!
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:00:39 +0200, Stefan Lützkendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
masonjm 2004/10/26 23:06:54
jakarta-slide/proposals/caldav - New directory
-
To
not be there.
Oliver
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:16:56 +0200, Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
This impresses me, as I really have almost the same code for a hand
optimized version for speed comparision against HashMap! By the way:
HashMap still wins the get/put
I'd like to nominate Warwick Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
a committer for the Slide project.
Warwick has contributed many bug reports and patches especially for
the DB2 adapter. His company is developing a collaboration product
based upon Slide and he will probably be
remitting lots of defects
I just tested the 2.1b2 release with this scripts. I ran it many times
concurrently with the normal testsuite and could still browse with the
Windows Explorer in acceptable time. This means more than 20 clients
where making read/write requests at any time!
Looks like 2.1b2 is ready for concurrent
25 oct. 04, à 18:18, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
While I did not have the chance to look into it I noticed your Slide
installation displays the ACLs set. How did you configure that?
Oliver
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:41:05 +0200, Thomas Draier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i finally
ExtendedStore is not affected by the deprecation of
AbstractSimpleService as it overrides the methods that cause the
deprecation. Still people should not use AbstractSimpleService as the
basis of their implementation which is expressed by the deprecation.
Oliver
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:02:21
By the following votes with no vetos Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been elected as a new committer for
the Jakarta Slide project:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Jacob Lund
at all?
Anyway, I have no problem with having another beta. Apart from this
particular change I think perhaps it is good idea anyway to flush out
some more bugs.
--
Unico
On 30-okt-04, at 10:58, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
I have moved display of collections as HTML pages
After quite some time of concurrent stress testing I could not get the
latest Slide from CVS with the fine grained locks to hang or fail in
any way. This looks fine :)
Compared to the previous WebDAV level locks as used in 2.1 these locks
allow concurrent modification and reading of unrelated
Folks,
I have just written a tutorial for locks in commons transaction and
made the fine grain locks the main example:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/locks/tutorial.html
Would be great if anyone could read it and tell me if this is non sense.
Oliver
Folks,
Slide's commons spawn Commons Transaction which resides in the Jakarta
Commons Sandbox and is used by Slide's internal locking, the file and
the memory store is on its way to maturity.
However, these should be more formal members in Commons Transaction as
it is important that I am not the
I'd like to nominate Thomas Draier [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
a committer for the Slide project.
Thomas has already contributed a number of patches for the WebDAV
layer and has shown that he has some experience concerning the special
issues of some clients.
I would be glad to have him as a committer
By the following votes with no vetos Thomas Draier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been elected as a new committer for
the Jakarta Slide project:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Jacob Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Peter Nevermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Martin Holz
Hi Thomas,
welcome as a Slide committer! In order to get you CVS access I will
need to know which is your desired apache login. You will get an email
adress like [your [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what do you want as your login?
More information for committers can be found here:
on a macosx environment and i can do some tests. i do not
use the integrated client very often, but i remember it worked on some
older version of slide - now the put method is not working anymore.
i'll have a look at it today.
thomas
Le 6 nov. 04, à 18:22, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
Folks
Great, I really like that :)
Oliver
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:10:55 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I now updated the properties expansion feature.
Now you can define properties in the domain.xml as children of the slide
element.
slide
property
One trace tool that worked for me (although far from perfect) is
http://httptrace.sourceforge.net/
Oliver
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:52:49 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great! Could you record the OSX requests that did not work with
a tracking tool as well and send
200 OK/D:status
/D:propstat
/D:response
/D:multistatus
0
Le 8 nov. 04, 16:29, Oliver Zeigermann a crit :
One trace tool that worked for me (although far from perfect) is
http://httptrace.sourceforge.net/
Oliver
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:52:49 +0100, Oliver
Thomas sent.
Oliver
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:01:50 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas thanks a lot!
I will make this a test case tomorrow or latest the day after
tomorrow. This really looks weird... I will try to find some time soon
to see what is going on here... I
the tests and return the default compatible value), but the test on
line 626 still pass (?) - and then creates a lock exception.
thomas
Le 8 nov. 04, 23:01, Oliver Zeigermann a crit :
Hi Thomas thanks a lot!
I will make this a test case tomorrow or latest the day after
tomorrow
Folks,
here is the test for distilled from the trace Thomas sent. I have
fixed an error in the GET methid in the CVS head, but it still fails,
as the requests subsequent to the LOCK request do not include the lock
token. I am not quite sure if this is because Thomas did not set
returns true, as it should do (goes through
all the tests and return the default compatible value), but the test
on
line 626 still pass (?) - and then creates a lock exception.
thomas
Le 8 nov. 04, 23:01, Oliver Zeigermann a crit :
Hi Thomas thanks a lot!
I will make
Thomas, could you - please, I know it is dull work - resend the trace
for me to complete the test case? This is important for future
problems with the Mac!
It might even be easier if you completed the test case - both for you
and me. The XML syntax is very simple and it should be no problem to
the put, and changed some response codes from 200 to
204. hope that works.
thomas
Le 9 nov. 04, à 17:04, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
Thomas, could you - please, I know it is dull work - resend the trace
for me to complete the test case? This is important for future
problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:01:32 +0100, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi commiters!
Can everybody who is interested in the XMLEditor license reply to this thread
and send the apache email address? So I'll collect them and finally order the
licenses.
I'm sure
the
lock token.
thomas
Le 10 nov. 04, à 08:36, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
Thanks,
so does the test case succeed with Slide? I was wondering about the
lock/unlock stuff not passing any lock token..,
Oliver
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:45:06 +0100, Thomas Draier
[EMAIL
. here's the working test case.
thomas
Le 10 nov. 04, à 18:34, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
I see. Is this what the Mac actually does? Adding the token to the
method headers?
I am nor very familiar with the testsuite either, but I am sure this
is possible. I will try and find out how
the project files. maven is replacing ant in more and more projects
and
i believe that would be the good time to integrate it into slide,
what
do you think ?
thomas
Le 18 oct. 04, à 09:24, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
+1 to all this.
I think we could begin restructuring the CVS HEAD soon
thomas
Le 10 nov. 04, à 23:31, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
Well, I tried to download it, but what is the login/password?
Oliver
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:18:10 +0100, Thomas Draier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
has anybody found some time to test the maven distribution i put
the project files. maven is replacing ant in more and more projects
and
i believe that would be the good time to integrate it into slide,
what
do you think ?
thomas
Le 18 oct. 04, à 09:24, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
+1 to all this.
I think we could begin restructuring the CVS
Shouldn't we take this over to the main branch as well?
Oliver
On 13 Nov 2004 14:42:01 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dsavazzi2004/11/13 06:42:01
Modified:src/stores/org/apache/slide/store/impl/rdbms Tag:
SLIDE_2_1_RELEASE_BRANCH
Folks,
lately I have had a look at the Jackrabbit project that has emerged
from the Slide proposals section. It is the reference implementation
for JCR aka JSR170. It is my impression that the JCR gets more and
more attention and it might be a good idea to implement it in Slide.
I thought the
Folks,
after we fixed the Oracle and the Mac OS X blockers are there any
other issues you feel that should be addressed before we can get to
the next release?
Anyway, should the next release be a beta or a release candidate? Even
though there have been additional patches, if there are no more
This sounds reasonable to me! Where is the patch you described?
Oliver
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:09:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
I guess this was meant to be on the list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:45:40 +0100
Subject: Re: JCR and Slide
To: James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, that was the idea...
Oliver
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:02:16
(:-(. I'd like to fix this
before releasing again, but I'm currently not quite sure what the
problem is. I try ASAP.
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
after we fixed the Oracle and the Mac OS X blockers are there any
other issues you feel that should be addressed before we can
.
With this functional, deltav and bind are running.
Stefan
Stefan Lützkendorf wrote:
Currently some BIND testcases are failing (:-(. I'd like to fix this
before releasing again, but I'm currently not quite sure what the
problem is. I try ASAP.
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote
+0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
after we fixed the Oracle and the Mac OS X blockers are there any
other issues you feel that should be addressed before we can get to
the next release?
Anyway, should the next release be a beta or a release candidate? Even
though there have been
Folks,
it might be time for a new Slide release. The question is whether we
should go directly to a release candidate as there do not seem to be
major open issues or if it should be another beta as some things have
changed.
I am +1 for the release and +1 for the release candidate as we still
can
Yes, please!
Oliver
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:23:21 +0100, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for release candidate
BTW: What about updating the roadmap? Shall I do so when I'm back home this
weekend?
Daniel
Slide Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am
16.11.04
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:22:57 -0800
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Next Slide release
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As above:
+1 release
+.5 RC
-James
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 15:16 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
it might
As soon as bugzilla works again I will commit the patch for Warwick.
Oliver
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:29:10 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
What did you do to make it work? Have you subscribed to the dev list
with you apache.org address? This has work for others...
Oliver
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:10:17 -0600, Ryan Rhodes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am still not getting my cvs commit messages posted to the dev list.
Oliver
With the following votes the Slide community has decided to release
Slide 2.1 RC1:
Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +0.5
Stefan Lützkendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Unico Hommes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1
Jacob Lund [EMAIL
The only thing that is still missing is the transaction patch from
Warwick. However, he still has no CVS karma. Warwick, wouldn't you
send in the updated patch, so we can continue?
Oliver
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:23:30 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the following votes
If you are not using compressed there will be an input stream in
content that is the one from the JDBC driver and *must* be closed to
close the connection. Try enabling compression if not already done and
see if this changes anything.
Oliver
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:25:12 +0100, Unico Hommes
NodeRevisionContent.getContentBytes() ? But it looks like that method
correctly closes the InputStream though.
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
If you are not using compressed there will be an input stream in
content that is the one from the JDBC driver and *must* be closed to
close the connection
ByteArrayInputStream(content.getContentBytes());
}
finally {
in.close();
}
Perhaps something goes wrong during
NodeRevisionContent.getContentBytes() ? But it looks like that method
correctly closes the InputStream though.
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
If you are not using compressed
Hey, Ryan,
what did you commit anyway? Just curious as we did not see any commit message...
Oliver
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:10:17 -0600, Ryan Rhodes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am still not getting my cvs commit messages posted to the dev list.
Oliver posted a message about this, but I
object and instead of Content.retrieve() we would have
Content.retrieveAsBytes(), Content.retrieveAsStream(),
Content.retrieveAsReader(). But I am not sure it is worth to change it.
Another option is to add a close() method to NodeRevisionContent. Hmm.
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote
?
-James
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 17:54 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Ah, this makes it clear!
I know it is really not obvious that you have to close a stream you do
not even touch, but there really is no better solution I am afraid :(
Same thing with the tx file store...
Oliver
On Fri, 19 Nov
When I just tried to use the testsuite from CVS HEAD it did not seem
to work, the released one works just fine.
Is this just me?
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Solved by latest commit, I used the Windows CMD tools which has not
been adapted to Stefan's latest changes.
Oliver
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:07:55 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I just tried to use the testsuite from CVS HEAD it did not seem
to work, the released one
After I had to work with Maven in the commons project I am at least -0
against using Maven as Slide's primary build tool. I have a strong
animosity against tools that do magic in any way. I need to know what
is going on.
Oliver
objections.
-James
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 23:08 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
After I had to work with Maven in the commons project I am at least -0
against using Maven as Slide's primary build tool. I have a strong
animosity against tools that do magic in any way. I need
had time to
play with Maven, so I'm rather in the dark here. I keep hearing good
things about it from others so I'm curious about the details of your
objections.
-James
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 23:08 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
After I had to work with Maven in the commons project
Better than the boring current one, but why is it so similar to the
Jakarta logo?
Oliver
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:56:32 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for kicks I put together an idea for a logo for Slide. I don't know
that we need one or anything, but I thought it would be a
even if many things are done automatically, i believe it
remains flexible enough. concerning slide, i did not need to write any
specifc task - just configured generic plugins.
of course it has my +1 :-)
thomas
Le 21 nov. 04, à 17:40, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
James,
most likely
http://dict.leo.org/?lp=endelang=desearchLoc=0cmpType=relaxedrelink=onsectHdr=onspellToler=stdsearch=slide
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:08:35 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better than the current one (:-).
Has Slide not other meaning than diapositive, may be we found a
nicer
?
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:41:24 -0800
Subject: Re: Unreleased database connections reading namespace
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about adding this to the javadoc
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:20:32 -0600, Ryan Rhodes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added support to the JCA adapter for creating a WebDAV Connection without
the connectionspec. I also added support for JAAS based authentication of
the JCA connector.
You can now configure ConnectionURL, username,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:25:09 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you clarify this definition for those of use (me) who don't read
German? It looks like Slide can translate many ways into German, but
it's not clear what the meanings are.
Just click the right sides to translate
and lazy-initialize
the input stream whenever it is used. This probably would need a change
to RDBMSAdapter interface (retrieveRevisionContent should return an
InputStream instead of NodeRevisionContent) and some changes to
NodeRevisionContent. WDYT?
--
Unico
Oliver Zeigermann
the meaning I had in
mind. I've been curious for awhile why the name Slide was chosen.
-James
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 00:04 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:25:09 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you clarify this definition for those of use (me) who don't
preferences. anyway, that would be better if everybody can test the
mavenized slide package before a decision is taken.
thomas
Le 21 nov. 04, à 18:46, Oliver Zeigermann a écrit :
Understood. As I said my reservations are more philosophical than
technical. Thinking about it Maven might
Folks,
I have just taken over moderation of the Slide lists from Rémy. So I
have all the power, but no idea how to do just anything *technically*.
Any hints?
Additionally, we will need more committer to volunteer as modeators! Anyone?
Oliver
As pointed to by Mirko Froehlich and confirmed by
testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/functional/extra/multi-user/getPut/getPutFolder.xml
there seems to be a bug in or around SecurityImpl
getActionAggregationClosureImpl that causes deadlocks. I guess this is
related to what Warwick already has found
, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As pointed to by Mirko Froehlich and confirmed by
testsuite/junit/xmltestcases/functional/extra/multi-user/getPut/getPutFolder.xml
there seems to be a bug in or around SecurityImpl
getActionAggregationClosureImpl that causes deadlocks. I guess
= security.namespace.getUri(token, uriAsString);
Now the new testcase passes as all access to the db is done inside a
single transaction.
Let's wait until Mirko either confirms this is fixed or reports
additional deadlock problems.
Oliver
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:04:06 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Please create a bugzilla entry for that patch so we can take it over to Slide.
Oliver
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:29:11 +0900, Taisuke Yamada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same problem here, and I have hacked up a patch to fix problems
I had with Java1.5 (attached to this email). With this patch, ant
will never allow us to release anything), but something that is
better than 2.0 which is the latest final version. From what I have
heard even 2.1b1 was better than 2.0 ;)
Oliver
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:04:06 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As pointed to by Mirko Froehlich and confirmed
Folks,
added Guido. Until recently somehow it has slipped my mind he became a
committer. By the way, would be good if I wasn't the only one to
update the site ;)
Additionally, moved some committers to the inactive section. If any of
these committer still considers themselves active, please move
The Commons Transaction Cummunity is prood to announce the immediate
availability of the first release candidate of Commons Transaction
1.0.
Commons Transaction has recently been promoted from the Commons
Sandbox and provides utility classes commonly used in transactional
Java programming.
Hi Warwick,
I was just asking the same question in one of my last posts to the dev
list. I asked what about the patch you wanted to contribute. Have you
read my post?
Oliver
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:04:47 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you guys getting ready to release
I sent it to slide dev list... Do you realize that you are not
subscribed to the dev list at all? So, you have not received any of
the previous messages to the list???
Ooopps..
Anyway, I would like to commit your patches, however, the patch for
32250 does not match the current state of the
.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072
And I'll generate a new patch file for the changes for defect 32250 against
the latest source in CVS.
Warwick
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004
Right, this is a dependency on the of the server on the client, but I
guess it would be better to have it dynamic.
Done.
Oliver
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:16:16 -0800, Warwick Burrows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a small build.xml issue with the latest submission of server
This seems to be settled now. Shall we roll out the release now?
James, do you still volunteer to do this? Would be great!
Oliver
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:51:21 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I have counted up the version number of the release branch and have
+0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be settled now. Shall we roll out the release now?
James, do you still volunteer to do this? Would be great!
Oliver
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:51:21 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I have
We have four list moderators now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The moderators will get a message once someone posts to the lists who
is not subscribed and not added to the allow list.When replying to it
you can accept the post and let it through to the
were correctly applied :).
-James
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 11:35 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
This seems to be settled now. Shall we roll out the release now?
James, do you still volunteer to do this? Would be great!
Oliver
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:51:21 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL
principalUrl more gracefully.
Oliver
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:58:46 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great :) Looking forward to the release!
Thanks,
Oliver
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:56:01
: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:10 PM
To: Slide Developers Mailing List
Cc: Warwick Burrows
Subject: Re: 2.1 RC1?
Hi Warwick,
I was just asking the same question in one of my last posts
to the dev list. I asked what about the patch you
Great,
for me this looks just fine :)
Oliver
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:02:03 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's Sanity Check time!
I've uploaded the release for 2.1rc1 to
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/slide/2.1rc1/
Please make sure I haven't messed anything up or
As Ryan's commit messages did not come through to the dev list, I only
now discovered some changes in the WebDAV connector. I am wondering of
what nature they are and if they should be taken over to CVS Head?
Oliver
-
To
Just found a very special commont about JSR170 by Hani Suleiman
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=jsr_170_more_inmates_running
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I understand the problem, but I do not understand the patch. Could you
explain, please?
Oliver
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:31:44 +0100, Honoré David N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are working on an opensource Document management system named Dissco
(http://www.meteo.be/DISSCO/)
Come on, James, give it to us, roll it out.
Oliver
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:02:03 -0800, James Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's Sanity Check time!
I've uploaded the release for 2.1rc1 to
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/slide/2.1rc1/
Please make sure I haven't messed anything up or
801 - 900 of 996 matches
Mail list logo
